SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Paraphrasing the NSA: 'Let Us Spy on You, Or Terrorists Win'
Intelligence chief Gen. Keith Alexander says that without bulk collection of private data, he can't save American lives
Dec 12, 2013
"I don't know a better way to do it," said General Keith Alexander, director of the National Intelligence Agency, to a Senate oversight panel on Wednesday.
Referring to the bulk-collection of personal data that the NSA sweeps up in a series of domestic and global surveillance programs that have been disclosed to the public through a trove a leaked internal documents this year, Alexander defended the practices of his agency as necessary to save lives.
"There is no other way we know of to connect the dots," he said in testimony and suggested, according to reporting by the Guardian's Spencer Ackerman, that even if lawmakers passed measures barring the collection of so-called "meta-data" and other forms of private information, "that would not be final word on the matter."
As Ackerman reports:
Alexander - along with his colleagues, deputy attorney general James Cole and top intelligence community lawyer Robert Litt - declined to take a firm position on a bill before the committee, sponsored by chairman Patrick Leahy, that would end the bulk collection without a court order.
Although the bill's text and stated intent would be to prevent suspicionless bulk data collection domestically, Cole said that the actual extent of the prohibition would "depend on how the courts interpret it."
It was the first time the NSA or its allies have suggested that its dragnets on American phone data might not be stopped even if Leahy's bill, which supporters claim has 120 co-sponsors in the House and Senate, passes through Congress.
Speaking to the panel, Alexander said the American public shouldn't be concerned about the size or scope of the NSA's claimed dragnet authority.
"The number isn't that big," Alexander responded when asked how many individuals' information was being swept up. "When the American people understand that, they'll know we're doing this right."
____________________________
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
"I don't know a better way to do it," said General Keith Alexander, director of the National Intelligence Agency, to a Senate oversight panel on Wednesday.
Referring to the bulk-collection of personal data that the NSA sweeps up in a series of domestic and global surveillance programs that have been disclosed to the public through a trove a leaked internal documents this year, Alexander defended the practices of his agency as necessary to save lives.
"There is no other way we know of to connect the dots," he said in testimony and suggested, according to reporting by the Guardian's Spencer Ackerman, that even if lawmakers passed measures barring the collection of so-called "meta-data" and other forms of private information, "that would not be final word on the matter."
As Ackerman reports:
Alexander - along with his colleagues, deputy attorney general James Cole and top intelligence community lawyer Robert Litt - declined to take a firm position on a bill before the committee, sponsored by chairman Patrick Leahy, that would end the bulk collection without a court order.
Although the bill's text and stated intent would be to prevent suspicionless bulk data collection domestically, Cole said that the actual extent of the prohibition would "depend on how the courts interpret it."
It was the first time the NSA or its allies have suggested that its dragnets on American phone data might not be stopped even if Leahy's bill, which supporters claim has 120 co-sponsors in the House and Senate, passes through Congress.
Speaking to the panel, Alexander said the American public shouldn't be concerned about the size or scope of the NSA's claimed dragnet authority.
"The number isn't that big," Alexander responded when asked how many individuals' information was being swept up. "When the American people understand that, they'll know we're doing this right."
____________________________
"I don't know a better way to do it," said General Keith Alexander, director of the National Intelligence Agency, to a Senate oversight panel on Wednesday.
Referring to the bulk-collection of personal data that the NSA sweeps up in a series of domestic and global surveillance programs that have been disclosed to the public through a trove a leaked internal documents this year, Alexander defended the practices of his agency as necessary to save lives.
"There is no other way we know of to connect the dots," he said in testimony and suggested, according to reporting by the Guardian's Spencer Ackerman, that even if lawmakers passed measures barring the collection of so-called "meta-data" and other forms of private information, "that would not be final word on the matter."
As Ackerman reports:
Alexander - along with his colleagues, deputy attorney general James Cole and top intelligence community lawyer Robert Litt - declined to take a firm position on a bill before the committee, sponsored by chairman Patrick Leahy, that would end the bulk collection without a court order.
Although the bill's text and stated intent would be to prevent suspicionless bulk data collection domestically, Cole said that the actual extent of the prohibition would "depend on how the courts interpret it."
It was the first time the NSA or its allies have suggested that its dragnets on American phone data might not be stopped even if Leahy's bill, which supporters claim has 120 co-sponsors in the House and Senate, passes through Congress.
Speaking to the panel, Alexander said the American public shouldn't be concerned about the size or scope of the NSA's claimed dragnet authority.
"The number isn't that big," Alexander responded when asked how many individuals' information was being swept up. "When the American people understand that, they'll know we're doing this right."
____________________________
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.