SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
According to the report Forbes Fat Cats Collect Taxpayer-Funded Farm Subsidies, authored by the Environmental Working Group (EWG), between 1995 and 2012 the federal government paid out $11.3 million to 50 billionaires or farm businesses in which they had an interest.
Though the billionaires' subsidies amount to a relatively meager portion of the federal budget, the report notes that a number of these 'Fat Cats' are eligible for even greater payments through the crop insurance loophole.
Unlike farm subsidies, crop insurance premium subsidy recipients are legally non-disclosed. Further, crop insurance subsidies are not subject to payment limits, conservation requirements or means testing, which permits the denial of subsidies to individuals with a certain amount of annual off-farm income.
"The irony," Scott Faber, EWG vice president for government affairs, told the New York Times, "is that farm subsidies are going to billionaires at the same time that there are proposals to kick three to five million people off of food stamps."
The report notes that proposed changes to the farm bill put forth by both the House and Senate will "shift subsidies from programs currently subject to means testing to the more generous crop insurance program," allowing a greater percentage of the funds to be doled out to undisclosed recipients of unknown net worth.
According to EWG's analysis,
more than 40 billionaires own properties that grow crops that are among the most likely to be insured through the federal crop insurance program, including corn, soybeans, wheat, cotton and sorghum. From 1995 to 2012, these five crops account for nearly $44 billion in premium subsidies - about 82 percent of total crop insurance subsidies and more than two-thirds of all acres enrolled in the crop insurance program.
As the Times points out, as legislators plan to shift money from farm programs with oversight requirements and income limits to less regulated crop insurance program, ironically, "other measures would subject food stamp recipients to drug testing, work requirements and income means-testing."
Further, EWG reports that the "largest one percent of farm businesses received about $227,000 a year in crop insurance premium support in 2011 - while the bottom 80 percent received only about $5,000 apiece."
_____________________
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
According to the report Forbes Fat Cats Collect Taxpayer-Funded Farm Subsidies, authored by the Environmental Working Group (EWG), between 1995 and 2012 the federal government paid out $11.3 million to 50 billionaires or farm businesses in which they had an interest.
Though the billionaires' subsidies amount to a relatively meager portion of the federal budget, the report notes that a number of these 'Fat Cats' are eligible for even greater payments through the crop insurance loophole.
Unlike farm subsidies, crop insurance premium subsidy recipients are legally non-disclosed. Further, crop insurance subsidies are not subject to payment limits, conservation requirements or means testing, which permits the denial of subsidies to individuals with a certain amount of annual off-farm income.
"The irony," Scott Faber, EWG vice president for government affairs, told the New York Times, "is that farm subsidies are going to billionaires at the same time that there are proposals to kick three to five million people off of food stamps."
The report notes that proposed changes to the farm bill put forth by both the House and Senate will "shift subsidies from programs currently subject to means testing to the more generous crop insurance program," allowing a greater percentage of the funds to be doled out to undisclosed recipients of unknown net worth.
According to EWG's analysis,
more than 40 billionaires own properties that grow crops that are among the most likely to be insured through the federal crop insurance program, including corn, soybeans, wheat, cotton and sorghum. From 1995 to 2012, these five crops account for nearly $44 billion in premium subsidies - about 82 percent of total crop insurance subsidies and more than two-thirds of all acres enrolled in the crop insurance program.
As the Times points out, as legislators plan to shift money from farm programs with oversight requirements and income limits to less regulated crop insurance program, ironically, "other measures would subject food stamp recipients to drug testing, work requirements and income means-testing."
Further, EWG reports that the "largest one percent of farm businesses received about $227,000 a year in crop insurance premium support in 2011 - while the bottom 80 percent received only about $5,000 apiece."
_____________________
According to the report Forbes Fat Cats Collect Taxpayer-Funded Farm Subsidies, authored by the Environmental Working Group (EWG), between 1995 and 2012 the federal government paid out $11.3 million to 50 billionaires or farm businesses in which they had an interest.
Though the billionaires' subsidies amount to a relatively meager portion of the federal budget, the report notes that a number of these 'Fat Cats' are eligible for even greater payments through the crop insurance loophole.
Unlike farm subsidies, crop insurance premium subsidy recipients are legally non-disclosed. Further, crop insurance subsidies are not subject to payment limits, conservation requirements or means testing, which permits the denial of subsidies to individuals with a certain amount of annual off-farm income.
"The irony," Scott Faber, EWG vice president for government affairs, told the New York Times, "is that farm subsidies are going to billionaires at the same time that there are proposals to kick three to five million people off of food stamps."
The report notes that proposed changes to the farm bill put forth by both the House and Senate will "shift subsidies from programs currently subject to means testing to the more generous crop insurance program," allowing a greater percentage of the funds to be doled out to undisclosed recipients of unknown net worth.
According to EWG's analysis,
more than 40 billionaires own properties that grow crops that are among the most likely to be insured through the federal crop insurance program, including corn, soybeans, wheat, cotton and sorghum. From 1995 to 2012, these five crops account for nearly $44 billion in premium subsidies - about 82 percent of total crop insurance subsidies and more than two-thirds of all acres enrolled in the crop insurance program.
As the Times points out, as legislators plan to shift money from farm programs with oversight requirements and income limits to less regulated crop insurance program, ironically, "other measures would subject food stamp recipients to drug testing, work requirements and income means-testing."
Further, EWG reports that the "largest one percent of farm businesses received about $227,000 a year in crop insurance premium support in 2011 - while the bottom 80 percent received only about $5,000 apiece."
_____________________