Nov 07, 2013
According to the report Forbes Fat Cats Collect Taxpayer-Funded Farm Subsidies, authored by the Environmental Working Group (EWG), between 1995 and 2012 the federal government paid out $11.3 million to 50 billionaires or farm businesses in which they had an interest.
Though the billionaires' subsidies amount to a relatively meager portion of the federal budget, the report notes that a number of these 'Fat Cats' are eligible for even greater payments through the crop insurance loophole.
Unlike farm subsidies, crop insurance premium subsidy recipients are legally non-disclosed. Further, crop insurance subsidies are not subject to payment limits, conservation requirements or means testing, which permits the denial of subsidies to individuals with a certain amount of annual off-farm income.
"The irony," Scott Faber, EWG vice president for government affairs, told the New York Times, "is that farm subsidies are going to billionaires at the same time that there are proposals to kick three to five million people off of food stamps."
The report notes that proposed changes to the farm bill put forth by both the House and Senate will "shift subsidies from programs currently subject to means testing to the more generous crop insurance program," allowing a greater percentage of the funds to be doled out to undisclosed recipients of unknown net worth.
According to EWG's analysis,
more than 40 billionaires own properties that grow crops that are among the most likely to be insured through the federal crop insurance program, including corn, soybeans, wheat, cotton and sorghum. From 1995 to 2012, these five crops account for nearly $44 billion in premium subsidies - about 82 percent of total crop insurance subsidies and more than two-thirds of all acres enrolled in the crop insurance program.
As the Times points out, as legislators plan to shift money from farm programs with oversight requirements and income limits to less regulated crop insurance program, ironically, "other measures would subject food stamp recipients to drug testing, work requirements and income means-testing."
Further, EWG reports that the "largest one percent of farm businesses received about $227,000 a year in crop insurance premium support in 2011 - while the bottom 80 percent received only about $5,000 apiece."
_____________________
An Unconstitutional Rampage
Trump and Musk are on an unconstitutional rampage, aiming for virtually every corner of the federal government. These two right-wing billionaires are targeting nurses, scientists, teachers, daycare providers, judges, veterans, air traffic controllers, and nuclear safety inspectors. No one is safe. The food stamps program, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are next. It’s an unprecedented disaster and a five-alarm fire, but there will be a reckoning. The people did not vote for this. The American people do not want this dystopian hellscape that hides behind claims of “efficiency.” Still, in reality, it is all a giveaway to corporate interests and the libertarian dreams of far-right oligarchs like Musk. Common Dreams is playing a vital role by reporting day and night on this orgy of corruption and greed, as well as what everyday people can do to organize and fight back. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Lauren McCauley
Lauren McCauley is a former senior editor for Common Dreams covering national and international politics and progressive news. She is now the Editor of Maine Morning Star. Lauren also helped produce a number of documentary films, including the award-winning Soundtrack for a Revolution and The Hollywood Complex, as well as one currently in production about civil rights icon James Meredith. Her writing has been featured on Newsweek, BillMoyers.com, TruthDig, Truthout, In These Times, and Extra! the newsletter of Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting. She currently lives in Kennebunk, Maine with her husband, two children, a dog, and several chickens.
According to the report Forbes Fat Cats Collect Taxpayer-Funded Farm Subsidies, authored by the Environmental Working Group (EWG), between 1995 and 2012 the federal government paid out $11.3 million to 50 billionaires or farm businesses in which they had an interest.
Though the billionaires' subsidies amount to a relatively meager portion of the federal budget, the report notes that a number of these 'Fat Cats' are eligible for even greater payments through the crop insurance loophole.
Unlike farm subsidies, crop insurance premium subsidy recipients are legally non-disclosed. Further, crop insurance subsidies are not subject to payment limits, conservation requirements or means testing, which permits the denial of subsidies to individuals with a certain amount of annual off-farm income.
"The irony," Scott Faber, EWG vice president for government affairs, told the New York Times, "is that farm subsidies are going to billionaires at the same time that there are proposals to kick three to five million people off of food stamps."
The report notes that proposed changes to the farm bill put forth by both the House and Senate will "shift subsidies from programs currently subject to means testing to the more generous crop insurance program," allowing a greater percentage of the funds to be doled out to undisclosed recipients of unknown net worth.
According to EWG's analysis,
more than 40 billionaires own properties that grow crops that are among the most likely to be insured through the federal crop insurance program, including corn, soybeans, wheat, cotton and sorghum. From 1995 to 2012, these five crops account for nearly $44 billion in premium subsidies - about 82 percent of total crop insurance subsidies and more than two-thirds of all acres enrolled in the crop insurance program.
As the Times points out, as legislators plan to shift money from farm programs with oversight requirements and income limits to less regulated crop insurance program, ironically, "other measures would subject food stamp recipients to drug testing, work requirements and income means-testing."
Further, EWG reports that the "largest one percent of farm businesses received about $227,000 a year in crop insurance premium support in 2011 - while the bottom 80 percent received only about $5,000 apiece."
_____________________
Lauren McCauley
Lauren McCauley is a former senior editor for Common Dreams covering national and international politics and progressive news. She is now the Editor of Maine Morning Star. Lauren also helped produce a number of documentary films, including the award-winning Soundtrack for a Revolution and The Hollywood Complex, as well as one currently in production about civil rights icon James Meredith. Her writing has been featured on Newsweek, BillMoyers.com, TruthDig, Truthout, In These Times, and Extra! the newsletter of Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting. She currently lives in Kennebunk, Maine with her husband, two children, a dog, and several chickens.
According to the report Forbes Fat Cats Collect Taxpayer-Funded Farm Subsidies, authored by the Environmental Working Group (EWG), between 1995 and 2012 the federal government paid out $11.3 million to 50 billionaires or farm businesses in which they had an interest.
Though the billionaires' subsidies amount to a relatively meager portion of the federal budget, the report notes that a number of these 'Fat Cats' are eligible for even greater payments through the crop insurance loophole.
Unlike farm subsidies, crop insurance premium subsidy recipients are legally non-disclosed. Further, crop insurance subsidies are not subject to payment limits, conservation requirements or means testing, which permits the denial of subsidies to individuals with a certain amount of annual off-farm income.
"The irony," Scott Faber, EWG vice president for government affairs, told the New York Times, "is that farm subsidies are going to billionaires at the same time that there are proposals to kick three to five million people off of food stamps."
The report notes that proposed changes to the farm bill put forth by both the House and Senate will "shift subsidies from programs currently subject to means testing to the more generous crop insurance program," allowing a greater percentage of the funds to be doled out to undisclosed recipients of unknown net worth.
According to EWG's analysis,
more than 40 billionaires own properties that grow crops that are among the most likely to be insured through the federal crop insurance program, including corn, soybeans, wheat, cotton and sorghum. From 1995 to 2012, these five crops account for nearly $44 billion in premium subsidies - about 82 percent of total crop insurance subsidies and more than two-thirds of all acres enrolled in the crop insurance program.
As the Times points out, as legislators plan to shift money from farm programs with oversight requirements and income limits to less regulated crop insurance program, ironically, "other measures would subject food stamp recipients to drug testing, work requirements and income means-testing."
Further, EWG reports that the "largest one percent of farm businesses received about $227,000 a year in crop insurance premium support in 2011 - while the bottom 80 percent received only about $5,000 apiece."
_____________________
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.