Hopes Dim to Protect World's 'Last Ocean' from Human Destruction
Pristine waters and fragile Antarctic ecosystem could remain unprotected against human destruction if "political will" not found

Delegates from 25 nations converged this week for a week-long gathering of The Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR) in Hobart, Australia to consider vast marine conservation proposals in the Ross Sea and waters off of East Antarctica.
"These are among our last intact marine areas, and they deserve meaningful, permanent protection, not halfway measures." -Andrea Kavanagh, Pew Charitable Trusts
Though previous talks had already resulted in scaled back ambitions, hopes remained high for what proponents of the sanctuaries said could still be the largest marine conservation areas ever created. Those hopes, however, were partially dashed when the delegates from New Zealand proposed a "sunset clause," which would deem any agreement temporary, allowing the possible reopening of areas to fishing and drilling within 15 years.
This move, critics argue, renders the entire agreement moot as only permanent protection can save the area from industrial devastation.
"We are worried about the permanence of the marine protected areas as there is talk of 15 years or 50 years as a sunset clause," Andrea Kavanagh, director of the Pew Charitable Trusts' southern ocean sanctuary campaign, told The Guardian.
"These areas need to be permanent, any less than that is not good enough," said Kavanagh. "If you think of the life of some of these species, such as deep sea corals and toothfish, 15 years is ridiculous."
The 'sunset' clause by New Zealand follows a series of strains in the negotiations since last October, which have already diminished the strength of a possible agreement.
Earlier this summer, Russia and Ukraine vetoed a proposed fishing ban in the region and the overall area for the sanctuary has already been cut by 40%.
The remaining conservation area in question would still be the largest to date, but would only double the 1% of the world's oceans that are currently protected.
Meanwhile, the chair of CCAMLR Leszek Dybiec has already cast doubt that this round of talks will produce a meaningful agreement, saying it may be unrealistic to expect the 25 members to come to a consensus.
Of the two areas proposed, 1.3 million square kilometers in the Ross Sea and 1.6 million square kilometers off east Antarctica, Dybiec said only one will stand a chance.
"We believe in this year we have a bigger chance to reach compromise, maybe not for both MPAs but, for example, for the Ross Sea," Dybiec told reporters in Hobart.
"What is the issue is--I guess you'd say--is the political will," said CCAMLR scientific committee chairman Dr. Christopher Jones.
A failure to protect the entirety of this region would be a major blow to marine ecosystems, conservation experts argue.
"Last year I sailed through the Ross Sea," said Bob Zuur from WWF-New Zealand at a news conference Wednesday in Hobart, Australia. "I saw dozens of whales, hundreds of seals and albatrosses and thousands of penguins. And that was just the wildlife on top of the water. The wildlife on the seafloor rivals that of the tropics. This area is really the Serengeti of the southern seas."
The Ross Sea is often referred to as "The Last Ocean" as it is one of the only large ocean areas remaining that has gone largely untouched by industrial fishing or resource extraction.
"The science supporting the two proposals is compelling, and it is only short-term economic gain that is blocking consensus," said Jim Barnes, director of the Antarctic and Southern Ocean Coalition.
"Countries are coming back to the table for a third attempt to agree on Antarctic marine reserves, and after investing significant resources over the past year studying and vetting those protections, it's time to act," Kavanagh said in a press statement. "These are among our last intact marine areas, and they deserve meaningful, permanent protection, not halfway measures."
_______________________
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Jacob Chamberlain is a former staff writer for Common Dreams. He is the author of Migrant Justice in the Age of Removal. His website is www.jacobpchamberlain.com.

Delegates from 25 nations converged this week for a week-long gathering of The Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR) in Hobart, Australia to consider vast marine conservation proposals in the Ross Sea and waters off of East Antarctica.
"These are among our last intact marine areas, and they deserve meaningful, permanent protection, not halfway measures." -Andrea Kavanagh, Pew Charitable Trusts
Though previous talks had already resulted in scaled back ambitions, hopes remained high for what proponents of the sanctuaries said could still be the largest marine conservation areas ever created. Those hopes, however, were partially dashed when the delegates from New Zealand proposed a "sunset clause," which would deem any agreement temporary, allowing the possible reopening of areas to fishing and drilling within 15 years.
This move, critics argue, renders the entire agreement moot as only permanent protection can save the area from industrial devastation.
"We are worried about the permanence of the marine protected areas as there is talk of 15 years or 50 years as a sunset clause," Andrea Kavanagh, director of the Pew Charitable Trusts' southern ocean sanctuary campaign, told The Guardian.
"These areas need to be permanent, any less than that is not good enough," said Kavanagh. "If you think of the life of some of these species, such as deep sea corals and toothfish, 15 years is ridiculous."
The 'sunset' clause by New Zealand follows a series of strains in the negotiations since last October, which have already diminished the strength of a possible agreement.
Earlier this summer, Russia and Ukraine vetoed a proposed fishing ban in the region and the overall area for the sanctuary has already been cut by 40%.
The remaining conservation area in question would still be the largest to date, but would only double the 1% of the world's oceans that are currently protected.
Meanwhile, the chair of CCAMLR Leszek Dybiec has already cast doubt that this round of talks will produce a meaningful agreement, saying it may be unrealistic to expect the 25 members to come to a consensus.
Of the two areas proposed, 1.3 million square kilometers in the Ross Sea and 1.6 million square kilometers off east Antarctica, Dybiec said only one will stand a chance.
"We believe in this year we have a bigger chance to reach compromise, maybe not for both MPAs but, for example, for the Ross Sea," Dybiec told reporters in Hobart.
"What is the issue is--I guess you'd say--is the political will," said CCAMLR scientific committee chairman Dr. Christopher Jones.
A failure to protect the entirety of this region would be a major blow to marine ecosystems, conservation experts argue.
"Last year I sailed through the Ross Sea," said Bob Zuur from WWF-New Zealand at a news conference Wednesday in Hobart, Australia. "I saw dozens of whales, hundreds of seals and albatrosses and thousands of penguins. And that was just the wildlife on top of the water. The wildlife on the seafloor rivals that of the tropics. This area is really the Serengeti of the southern seas."
The Ross Sea is often referred to as "The Last Ocean" as it is one of the only large ocean areas remaining that has gone largely untouched by industrial fishing or resource extraction.
"The science supporting the two proposals is compelling, and it is only short-term economic gain that is blocking consensus," said Jim Barnes, director of the Antarctic and Southern Ocean Coalition.
"Countries are coming back to the table for a third attempt to agree on Antarctic marine reserves, and after investing significant resources over the past year studying and vetting those protections, it's time to act," Kavanagh said in a press statement. "These are among our last intact marine areas, and they deserve meaningful, permanent protection, not halfway measures."
_______________________
Jacob Chamberlain is a former staff writer for Common Dreams. He is the author of Migrant Justice in the Age of Removal. His website is www.jacobpchamberlain.com.

Delegates from 25 nations converged this week for a week-long gathering of The Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR) in Hobart, Australia to consider vast marine conservation proposals in the Ross Sea and waters off of East Antarctica.
"These are among our last intact marine areas, and they deserve meaningful, permanent protection, not halfway measures." -Andrea Kavanagh, Pew Charitable Trusts
Though previous talks had already resulted in scaled back ambitions, hopes remained high for what proponents of the sanctuaries said could still be the largest marine conservation areas ever created. Those hopes, however, were partially dashed when the delegates from New Zealand proposed a "sunset clause," which would deem any agreement temporary, allowing the possible reopening of areas to fishing and drilling within 15 years.
This move, critics argue, renders the entire agreement moot as only permanent protection can save the area from industrial devastation.
"We are worried about the permanence of the marine protected areas as there is talk of 15 years or 50 years as a sunset clause," Andrea Kavanagh, director of the Pew Charitable Trusts' southern ocean sanctuary campaign, told The Guardian.
"These areas need to be permanent, any less than that is not good enough," said Kavanagh. "If you think of the life of some of these species, such as deep sea corals and toothfish, 15 years is ridiculous."
The 'sunset' clause by New Zealand follows a series of strains in the negotiations since last October, which have already diminished the strength of a possible agreement.
Earlier this summer, Russia and Ukraine vetoed a proposed fishing ban in the region and the overall area for the sanctuary has already been cut by 40%.
The remaining conservation area in question would still be the largest to date, but would only double the 1% of the world's oceans that are currently protected.
Meanwhile, the chair of CCAMLR Leszek Dybiec has already cast doubt that this round of talks will produce a meaningful agreement, saying it may be unrealistic to expect the 25 members to come to a consensus.
Of the two areas proposed, 1.3 million square kilometers in the Ross Sea and 1.6 million square kilometers off east Antarctica, Dybiec said only one will stand a chance.
"We believe in this year we have a bigger chance to reach compromise, maybe not for both MPAs but, for example, for the Ross Sea," Dybiec told reporters in Hobart.
"What is the issue is--I guess you'd say--is the political will," said CCAMLR scientific committee chairman Dr. Christopher Jones.
A failure to protect the entirety of this region would be a major blow to marine ecosystems, conservation experts argue.
"Last year I sailed through the Ross Sea," said Bob Zuur from WWF-New Zealand at a news conference Wednesday in Hobart, Australia. "I saw dozens of whales, hundreds of seals and albatrosses and thousands of penguins. And that was just the wildlife on top of the water. The wildlife on the seafloor rivals that of the tropics. This area is really the Serengeti of the southern seas."
The Ross Sea is often referred to as "The Last Ocean" as it is one of the only large ocean areas remaining that has gone largely untouched by industrial fishing or resource extraction.
"The science supporting the two proposals is compelling, and it is only short-term economic gain that is blocking consensus," said Jim Barnes, director of the Antarctic and Southern Ocean Coalition.
"Countries are coming back to the table for a third attempt to agree on Antarctic marine reserves, and after investing significant resources over the past year studying and vetting those protections, it's time to act," Kavanagh said in a press statement. "These are among our last intact marine areas, and they deserve meaningful, permanent protection, not halfway measures."
_______________________

