Human rights advocates slammed a judge's decision Monday to give California prison officials the green light to force-feed prisoners who are on hunger strike by deeming "do not resuscitate" orders signed by inmates invalid.
“This [court decision] violates all international laws and standards and gives the medical director of each prison authority to violate human rights laws instead of reasonably negotiating with prisoners," declared Claude Marks of the Prisoner Hunger Strike Solidarity Coalition.
The ruling, passed by U.S. District Court Judge Thelton E. Henderson in response to requests from state authorities, contradicts a California state law explicitly prohibiting force-feedings for prisoners who signed orders that they be allowed to die.
State officials argued in the courts that prisoners signed the papers under coercion by what they allege is gang control, and the judge acquiesced, ruling that the "do not resuscitate" orders no longer have legal standing.
Prisoners and their allies charge that unproven claims of gang coercion are levied by prison authorities in attempt to break the hunger strike, dehumanize inmates and justify cruel collective punishment.
“CDCR’s [the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation's] approach is hopeless and dangerous," declared Azadeh Zohrabi, spokesperson for the Prisoner Hunger Strike Solidarity Coalition. "It perpetuates a logic that says it is okay to torture someone based on their criminal convictions. It creates prison conditions that destroy people physically and mentally, and arbitrarily metes out punishment that exceeds any sentences passed down by the courts."
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT
Never Miss a Beat.
Get our best delivered to your inbox.
Human rights advocates slammed the practice of force-feeding that has been condemned as a violation of international law by subjecting inmates to cruel and torturous punishment. The process involves "snaking feeding tubes through inmates' noses and into their stomachs," the AP reports.
"Force-feeding violates international law to the extent that it involves somebody who doesn't give their consent," declared Jules Lobel, president of the Center for Constitutional Rights, who represents 10 inmates suing to end prolonged solitary confinement at Pelican Bay State Prison.
The issue was thrust into the media spotlight due to the the controversial and widely condemned force-feeding of Guantanamo Bay inmates on hunger strike. "This approach [in California], much like Guantanamo, sets the U.S. apart from all related international human rights standards," Marks declared.
There is no data on rates of force-feedings in U.S. prisons, but this is not the first time U.S. courts have intervened to give the go-ahead for the controversial practice.
While the number of hunger striking prisoners is consistently under-counted, the media is widely reporting that at least 69 inmates have consistently gone without food since the California prison hunger strikes were launched July 8.
In the third major prisoner hunger strike in the state since 2011, prisoners are demanding an end to solitary confinement, as well as a halt to collective punishments, harsh crackdowns under the auspices of 'stopping gang activities,' and access to education, healthcare and healthy food.