

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

The country is in danger of falling into a "very slippery slope of basically punishing people for getting information out to press" if Lind does not drop the charge before the sentence ruling on Thursday, Manning's lawyer David Coombs said during oral arguments on Monday.
Coombs said government prosecutors have ultimately failed to present evidence showing Manning had "actual knowledge" that an "enemy" would see the military documents Manning had leaked to WikiLeaks.
To convict Manning of "aiding the enemy," which would result in a life sentence, would basically amount to "putting a hammer down on any whistleblower or anybody who wants to put information out," Coombs said.
Such a ruling would set an "extremely bad precedent," he warned.
Lind, who is presiding over the court martial at Fort Meade, said she would also rule on Thursday on the defense's motions to drop charges that Manning "exceeded authorized access" on his computer, stole, and knowingly converted databases containing United States government information--all of which could amount to Manning's harshest sentence, next to "aiding the enemy" which carries life in prison.
Following Lind's expected decision on Thursday, prosecutors will be allowed to call three witnesses for a rebuttal case.
They will be expected to "attempt to undermine testimony defending WikiLeaks as a legitimate news outlet and casting Manning as driven by the public good," writes Courthouse News reporter Adam Klasfeld, who has been following the case closely.
Key witness Harvard Professor Yochai Benkler told the court on Wednesday that WikiLeaks is "a legitimate journalistic organization" rather than an organization which aids "terrorist organizations," as has been portrayed by the U.S. government. He stated:
[I]f handing materials over to an organization that can be read by anyone with an internet connection, means that you are handing [it] over to the enemy--that essentially means that any leak to a media organization that can be read by any enemy anywhere in the world, becomes automatically aiding the enemy.
Benkler's testimony supported the defense's request to drop a number of charges against the whistleblower including 'aiding the enemy.'
According to reporter Alexa O'Brien, closing arguments will follow the prosecution's rebuttal case, after which Judge Lind will deliberate and announce her findings.
If Manning is convicted, a "sentencing case" will begin immediately.
"During the sentencing case, both defense and the prosecution will present evidence, call witnesses, and make arguments about appropriate punishment," reports O'Brien.
_______________________
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Jacob Chamberlain is a former staff writer for Common Dreams. He is the author of Migrant Justice in the Age of Removal. His website is www.jacobpchamberlain.com.

The country is in danger of falling into a "very slippery slope of basically punishing people for getting information out to press" if Lind does not drop the charge before the sentence ruling on Thursday, Manning's lawyer David Coombs said during oral arguments on Monday.
Coombs said government prosecutors have ultimately failed to present evidence showing Manning had "actual knowledge" that an "enemy" would see the military documents Manning had leaked to WikiLeaks.
To convict Manning of "aiding the enemy," which would result in a life sentence, would basically amount to "putting a hammer down on any whistleblower or anybody who wants to put information out," Coombs said.
Such a ruling would set an "extremely bad precedent," he warned.
Lind, who is presiding over the court martial at Fort Meade, said she would also rule on Thursday on the defense's motions to drop charges that Manning "exceeded authorized access" on his computer, stole, and knowingly converted databases containing United States government information--all of which could amount to Manning's harshest sentence, next to "aiding the enemy" which carries life in prison.
Following Lind's expected decision on Thursday, prosecutors will be allowed to call three witnesses for a rebuttal case.
They will be expected to "attempt to undermine testimony defending WikiLeaks as a legitimate news outlet and casting Manning as driven by the public good," writes Courthouse News reporter Adam Klasfeld, who has been following the case closely.
Key witness Harvard Professor Yochai Benkler told the court on Wednesday that WikiLeaks is "a legitimate journalistic organization" rather than an organization which aids "terrorist organizations," as has been portrayed by the U.S. government. He stated:
[I]f handing materials over to an organization that can be read by anyone with an internet connection, means that you are handing [it] over to the enemy--that essentially means that any leak to a media organization that can be read by any enemy anywhere in the world, becomes automatically aiding the enemy.
Benkler's testimony supported the defense's request to drop a number of charges against the whistleblower including 'aiding the enemy.'
According to reporter Alexa O'Brien, closing arguments will follow the prosecution's rebuttal case, after which Judge Lind will deliberate and announce her findings.
If Manning is convicted, a "sentencing case" will begin immediately.
"During the sentencing case, both defense and the prosecution will present evidence, call witnesses, and make arguments about appropriate punishment," reports O'Brien.
_______________________
Jacob Chamberlain is a former staff writer for Common Dreams. He is the author of Migrant Justice in the Age of Removal. His website is www.jacobpchamberlain.com.

The country is in danger of falling into a "very slippery slope of basically punishing people for getting information out to press" if Lind does not drop the charge before the sentence ruling on Thursday, Manning's lawyer David Coombs said during oral arguments on Monday.
Coombs said government prosecutors have ultimately failed to present evidence showing Manning had "actual knowledge" that an "enemy" would see the military documents Manning had leaked to WikiLeaks.
To convict Manning of "aiding the enemy," which would result in a life sentence, would basically amount to "putting a hammer down on any whistleblower or anybody who wants to put information out," Coombs said.
Such a ruling would set an "extremely bad precedent," he warned.
Lind, who is presiding over the court martial at Fort Meade, said she would also rule on Thursday on the defense's motions to drop charges that Manning "exceeded authorized access" on his computer, stole, and knowingly converted databases containing United States government information--all of which could amount to Manning's harshest sentence, next to "aiding the enemy" which carries life in prison.
Following Lind's expected decision on Thursday, prosecutors will be allowed to call three witnesses for a rebuttal case.
They will be expected to "attempt to undermine testimony defending WikiLeaks as a legitimate news outlet and casting Manning as driven by the public good," writes Courthouse News reporter Adam Klasfeld, who has been following the case closely.
Key witness Harvard Professor Yochai Benkler told the court on Wednesday that WikiLeaks is "a legitimate journalistic organization" rather than an organization which aids "terrorist organizations," as has been portrayed by the U.S. government. He stated:
[I]f handing materials over to an organization that can be read by anyone with an internet connection, means that you are handing [it] over to the enemy--that essentially means that any leak to a media organization that can be read by any enemy anywhere in the world, becomes automatically aiding the enemy.
Benkler's testimony supported the defense's request to drop a number of charges against the whistleblower including 'aiding the enemy.'
According to reporter Alexa O'Brien, closing arguments will follow the prosecution's rebuttal case, after which Judge Lind will deliberate and announce her findings.
If Manning is convicted, a "sentencing case" will begin immediately.
"During the sentencing case, both defense and the prosecution will present evidence, call witnesses, and make arguments about appropriate punishment," reports O'Brien.
_______________________