SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
The country is in danger of falling into a "very slippery slope of basically punishing people for getting information out to press" if Lind does not drop the charge before the sentence ruling on Thursday, Manning's lawyer David Coombs said during oral arguments on Monday.
Coombs said government prosecutors have ultimately failed to present evidence showing Manning had "actual knowledge" that an "enemy" would see the military documents Manning had leaked to WikiLeaks.
To convict Manning of "aiding the enemy," which would result in a life sentence, would basically amount to "putting a hammer down on any whistleblower or anybody who wants to put information out," Coombs said.
Such a ruling would set an "extremely bad precedent," he warned.
Lind, who is presiding over the court martial at Fort Meade, said she would also rule on Thursday on the defense's motions to drop charges that Manning "exceeded authorized access" on his computer, stole, and knowingly converted databases containing United States government information--all of which could amount to Manning's harshest sentence, next to "aiding the enemy" which carries life in prison.
Following Lind's expected decision on Thursday, prosecutors will be allowed to call three witnesses for a rebuttal case.
They will be expected to "attempt to undermine testimony defending WikiLeaks as a legitimate news outlet and casting Manning as driven by the public good," writes Courthouse News reporter Adam Klasfeld, who has been following the case closely.
Key witness Harvard Professor Yochai Benkler told the court on Wednesday that WikiLeaks is "a legitimate journalistic organization" rather than an organization which aids "terrorist organizations," as has been portrayed by the U.S. government. He stated:
[I]f handing materials over to an organization that can be read by anyone with an internet connection, means that you are handing [it] over to the enemy--that essentially means that any leak to a media organization that can be read by any enemy anywhere in the world, becomes automatically aiding the enemy.
Benkler's testimony supported the defense's request to drop a number of charges against the whistleblower including 'aiding the enemy.'
According to reporter Alexa O'Brien, closing arguments will follow the prosecution's rebuttal case, after which Judge Lind will deliberate and announce her findings.
If Manning is convicted, a "sentencing case" will begin immediately.
"During the sentencing case, both defense and the prosecution will present evidence, call witnesses, and make arguments about appropriate punishment," reports O'Brien.
_______________________
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The country is in danger of falling into a "very slippery slope of basically punishing people for getting information out to press" if Lind does not drop the charge before the sentence ruling on Thursday, Manning's lawyer David Coombs said during oral arguments on Monday.
Coombs said government prosecutors have ultimately failed to present evidence showing Manning had "actual knowledge" that an "enemy" would see the military documents Manning had leaked to WikiLeaks.
To convict Manning of "aiding the enemy," which would result in a life sentence, would basically amount to "putting a hammer down on any whistleblower or anybody who wants to put information out," Coombs said.
Such a ruling would set an "extremely bad precedent," he warned.
Lind, who is presiding over the court martial at Fort Meade, said she would also rule on Thursday on the defense's motions to drop charges that Manning "exceeded authorized access" on his computer, stole, and knowingly converted databases containing United States government information--all of which could amount to Manning's harshest sentence, next to "aiding the enemy" which carries life in prison.
Following Lind's expected decision on Thursday, prosecutors will be allowed to call three witnesses for a rebuttal case.
They will be expected to "attempt to undermine testimony defending WikiLeaks as a legitimate news outlet and casting Manning as driven by the public good," writes Courthouse News reporter Adam Klasfeld, who has been following the case closely.
Key witness Harvard Professor Yochai Benkler told the court on Wednesday that WikiLeaks is "a legitimate journalistic organization" rather than an organization which aids "terrorist organizations," as has been portrayed by the U.S. government. He stated:
[I]f handing materials over to an organization that can be read by anyone with an internet connection, means that you are handing [it] over to the enemy--that essentially means that any leak to a media organization that can be read by any enemy anywhere in the world, becomes automatically aiding the enemy.
Benkler's testimony supported the defense's request to drop a number of charges against the whistleblower including 'aiding the enemy.'
According to reporter Alexa O'Brien, closing arguments will follow the prosecution's rebuttal case, after which Judge Lind will deliberate and announce her findings.
If Manning is convicted, a "sentencing case" will begin immediately.
"During the sentencing case, both defense and the prosecution will present evidence, call witnesses, and make arguments about appropriate punishment," reports O'Brien.
_______________________
The country is in danger of falling into a "very slippery slope of basically punishing people for getting information out to press" if Lind does not drop the charge before the sentence ruling on Thursday, Manning's lawyer David Coombs said during oral arguments on Monday.
Coombs said government prosecutors have ultimately failed to present evidence showing Manning had "actual knowledge" that an "enemy" would see the military documents Manning had leaked to WikiLeaks.
To convict Manning of "aiding the enemy," which would result in a life sentence, would basically amount to "putting a hammer down on any whistleblower or anybody who wants to put information out," Coombs said.
Such a ruling would set an "extremely bad precedent," he warned.
Lind, who is presiding over the court martial at Fort Meade, said she would also rule on Thursday on the defense's motions to drop charges that Manning "exceeded authorized access" on his computer, stole, and knowingly converted databases containing United States government information--all of which could amount to Manning's harshest sentence, next to "aiding the enemy" which carries life in prison.
Following Lind's expected decision on Thursday, prosecutors will be allowed to call three witnesses for a rebuttal case.
They will be expected to "attempt to undermine testimony defending WikiLeaks as a legitimate news outlet and casting Manning as driven by the public good," writes Courthouse News reporter Adam Klasfeld, who has been following the case closely.
Key witness Harvard Professor Yochai Benkler told the court on Wednesday that WikiLeaks is "a legitimate journalistic organization" rather than an organization which aids "terrorist organizations," as has been portrayed by the U.S. government. He stated:
[I]f handing materials over to an organization that can be read by anyone with an internet connection, means that you are handing [it] over to the enemy--that essentially means that any leak to a media organization that can be read by any enemy anywhere in the world, becomes automatically aiding the enemy.
Benkler's testimony supported the defense's request to drop a number of charges against the whistleblower including 'aiding the enemy.'
According to reporter Alexa O'Brien, closing arguments will follow the prosecution's rebuttal case, after which Judge Lind will deliberate and announce her findings.
If Manning is convicted, a "sentencing case" will begin immediately.
"During the sentencing case, both defense and the prosecution will present evidence, call witnesses, and make arguments about appropriate punishment," reports O'Brien.
_______________________