

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Benkler's testimony supported the defense's request to drop a number of charges against the whistleblower--including the most serious charge of 'aiding the enemy.'
According to Firedoglake's Kevin Gosztola, Benkler's testimony showed that the prosecution's argument that WikiLeaks "is not a legitimate journalistic organization...committed to advancing the cause of transparency but rather an anti-American organization that had a website, where the enemy could go to for US government information" is simply government propaganda created after Manning's embarrassing leaks--not before.
As Ed Pilkington noted during a live chat at the Guardian's website following today's hearing, "the 'aiding the enemy' charge goes right to the heart of this case and why it's so massively important to freedom of speech and journalism in America."
"In bringing this charge the US gov is saying, quite literally," Pilkington adds, "that by leaking to a website, Manning was handing the information to Osama bin Laden and al-Qaida. If that doesn't put a chill on whistleblowing, I don't know what will."
Arguments are now closed, meaning Manning will not be testifying in his trial.
"Rebuttals" to the defense's arguments are expected from the government's prosecutors on Monday, particularly to the motions to drop the "aiding the enemy" charge.
If the rebuttals are denied, closing arguments will begin on Tuesday.
Follow tweets from experts following the case below:
_____________________
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Jacob Chamberlain is a former staff writer for Common Dreams. He is the author of Migrant Justice in the Age of Removal. His website is www.jacobpchamberlain.com.

Benkler's testimony supported the defense's request to drop a number of charges against the whistleblower--including the most serious charge of 'aiding the enemy.'
According to Firedoglake's Kevin Gosztola, Benkler's testimony showed that the prosecution's argument that WikiLeaks "is not a legitimate journalistic organization...committed to advancing the cause of transparency but rather an anti-American organization that had a website, where the enemy could go to for US government information" is simply government propaganda created after Manning's embarrassing leaks--not before.
As Ed Pilkington noted during a live chat at the Guardian's website following today's hearing, "the 'aiding the enemy' charge goes right to the heart of this case and why it's so massively important to freedom of speech and journalism in America."
"In bringing this charge the US gov is saying, quite literally," Pilkington adds, "that by leaking to a website, Manning was handing the information to Osama bin Laden and al-Qaida. If that doesn't put a chill on whistleblowing, I don't know what will."
Arguments are now closed, meaning Manning will not be testifying in his trial.
"Rebuttals" to the defense's arguments are expected from the government's prosecutors on Monday, particularly to the motions to drop the "aiding the enemy" charge.
If the rebuttals are denied, closing arguments will begin on Tuesday.
Follow tweets from experts following the case below:
_____________________
Jacob Chamberlain is a former staff writer for Common Dreams. He is the author of Migrant Justice in the Age of Removal. His website is www.jacobpchamberlain.com.

Benkler's testimony supported the defense's request to drop a number of charges against the whistleblower--including the most serious charge of 'aiding the enemy.'
According to Firedoglake's Kevin Gosztola, Benkler's testimony showed that the prosecution's argument that WikiLeaks "is not a legitimate journalistic organization...committed to advancing the cause of transparency but rather an anti-American organization that had a website, where the enemy could go to for US government information" is simply government propaganda created after Manning's embarrassing leaks--not before.
As Ed Pilkington noted during a live chat at the Guardian's website following today's hearing, "the 'aiding the enemy' charge goes right to the heart of this case and why it's so massively important to freedom of speech and journalism in America."
"In bringing this charge the US gov is saying, quite literally," Pilkington adds, "that by leaking to a website, Manning was handing the information to Osama bin Laden and al-Qaida. If that doesn't put a chill on whistleblowing, I don't know what will."
Arguments are now closed, meaning Manning will not be testifying in his trial.
"Rebuttals" to the defense's arguments are expected from the government's prosecutors on Monday, particularly to the motions to drop the "aiding the enemy" charge.
If the rebuttals are denied, closing arguments will begin on Tuesday.
Follow tweets from experts following the case below:
_____________________