SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Benkler's testimony supported the defense's request to drop a number of charges against the whistleblower--including the most serious charge of 'aiding the enemy.'
According to Firedoglake's Kevin Gosztola, Benkler's testimony showed that the prosecution's argument that WikiLeaks "is not a legitimate journalistic organization...committed to advancing the cause of transparency but rather an anti-American organization that had a website, where the enemy could go to for US government information" is simply government propaganda created after Manning's embarrassing leaks--not before.
As Ed Pilkington noted during a live chat at the Guardian's website following today's hearing, "the 'aiding the enemy' charge goes right to the heart of this case and why it's so massively important to freedom of speech and journalism in America."
"In bringing this charge the US gov is saying, quite literally," Pilkington adds, "that by leaking to a website, Manning was handing the information to Osama bin Laden and al-Qaida. If that doesn't put a chill on whistleblowing, I don't know what will."
Arguments are now closed, meaning Manning will not be testifying in his trial.
"Rebuttals" to the defense's arguments are expected from the government's prosecutors on Monday, particularly to the motions to drop the "aiding the enemy" charge.
If the rebuttals are denied, closing arguments will begin on Tuesday.
Follow tweets from experts following the case below:
_____________________
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Benkler's testimony supported the defense's request to drop a number of charges against the whistleblower--including the most serious charge of 'aiding the enemy.'
According to Firedoglake's Kevin Gosztola, Benkler's testimony showed that the prosecution's argument that WikiLeaks "is not a legitimate journalistic organization...committed to advancing the cause of transparency but rather an anti-American organization that had a website, where the enemy could go to for US government information" is simply government propaganda created after Manning's embarrassing leaks--not before.
As Ed Pilkington noted during a live chat at the Guardian's website following today's hearing, "the 'aiding the enemy' charge goes right to the heart of this case and why it's so massively important to freedom of speech and journalism in America."
"In bringing this charge the US gov is saying, quite literally," Pilkington adds, "that by leaking to a website, Manning was handing the information to Osama bin Laden and al-Qaida. If that doesn't put a chill on whistleblowing, I don't know what will."
Arguments are now closed, meaning Manning will not be testifying in his trial.
"Rebuttals" to the defense's arguments are expected from the government's prosecutors on Monday, particularly to the motions to drop the "aiding the enemy" charge.
If the rebuttals are denied, closing arguments will begin on Tuesday.
Follow tweets from experts following the case below:
_____________________
Benkler's testimony supported the defense's request to drop a number of charges against the whistleblower--including the most serious charge of 'aiding the enemy.'
According to Firedoglake's Kevin Gosztola, Benkler's testimony showed that the prosecution's argument that WikiLeaks "is not a legitimate journalistic organization...committed to advancing the cause of transparency but rather an anti-American organization that had a website, where the enemy could go to for US government information" is simply government propaganda created after Manning's embarrassing leaks--not before.
As Ed Pilkington noted during a live chat at the Guardian's website following today's hearing, "the 'aiding the enemy' charge goes right to the heart of this case and why it's so massively important to freedom of speech and journalism in America."
"In bringing this charge the US gov is saying, quite literally," Pilkington adds, "that by leaking to a website, Manning was handing the information to Osama bin Laden and al-Qaida. If that doesn't put a chill on whistleblowing, I don't know what will."
Arguments are now closed, meaning Manning will not be testifying in his trial.
"Rebuttals" to the defense's arguments are expected from the government's prosecutors on Monday, particularly to the motions to drop the "aiding the enemy" charge.
If the rebuttals are denied, closing arguments will begin on Tuesday.
Follow tweets from experts following the case below:
_____________________