SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Photo via Flickr / Toban B / Creative Commons License)
Fracking Activists Could Face Felony Charges as "Ag-Gag" Laws Spread
New Pennsylvania law would criminalize animal rights and anti-fracking activists
May 09, 2013
The same "Ag-Gag" laws that make it a crime to film or document egregious abuses on industrial farms may soon be used to criminalize anti-fracking activists who seek to expose environmental harms brought on by the gas drilling industry--if a bill recently proposed in Pennsylvannia passes.
House Bill 683, sponsored by Rep. Gary Haluska, D-Cambria, would make it a felony to take photos, video or audio on private land used for "agricultural purposes," downloading or distributing any such recordings; and entering agricultural property if one plans on recording.
However, as Pittsburg's TribLive reports, the bill would go even further, in that gas frackers now commonly drilling on land that would otherwise be used for "agricultural purposes" would also be protected--meaning anyone looking to document what goes on in the ordinary day of a gas fracker, could be slapped with felony charges.
According to TribLive, Ross Pifer, director of the Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center at Penn State University's Dickinson School of Law, said hydraulic fracturing operations could be protected under the new bill because gas companies often lease land from farmers.
"If you view it expansively, you'd have to view it as: Anything that takes place on that land (is protected)," Pifer said.
Melissa Troutman, outreach coordinator at Mountain Watershed Association, which investigates and records fracking activity, said the law would shield any illegal activities conducted by gas frackers from public view.
"If it passes, what's next?" said Troutman. "No documenting commercial or recreational activity? Right now it's legal to photograph industrial operations on public lands. Will that be illegal next?
Attempting to justify his sponsorship of the bill, Haluska claimed that activists only exaggerate criminal abuses inside of factory farms--meaning they should not be able to film what goes on inside. Haluska's words, however, did not serve his purpose: "They take video and say, 'Look, this guy's dragging a cow on a chain with a tractor.' Well, there aren't too many ways of moving a cow."
Matthew Dominguez, the Humane Society of the United States' public policy manager for farm animal protection, stated: "Animal welfare groups have exposed egregious animal cruelty through recordings and photos, and the industry's response hasn't been to clean up its act but to merely make it illegal to expose what's happening. They don't have the right to keep people in the dark. This bill would hinder our ability to expose abuses."
The same will now go for those in the gas fracking industry.
Ag-Gag bills have either been proposed or enacted in roughly a dozen states.
Versions have been passed in Iowa, Utah and Missouri, and are under consideration in Indiana, Nebraska, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Tennessee and Vermont.
_______________________
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Jacob Chamberlain
Jacob Chamberlain is a former staff writer for Common Dreams. His website is www.jacobpchamberlain.com.
The same "Ag-Gag" laws that make it a crime to film or document egregious abuses on industrial farms may soon be used to criminalize anti-fracking activists who seek to expose environmental harms brought on by the gas drilling industry--if a bill recently proposed in Pennsylvannia passes.
House Bill 683, sponsored by Rep. Gary Haluska, D-Cambria, would make it a felony to take photos, video or audio on private land used for "agricultural purposes," downloading or distributing any such recordings; and entering agricultural property if one plans on recording.
However, as Pittsburg's TribLive reports, the bill would go even further, in that gas frackers now commonly drilling on land that would otherwise be used for "agricultural purposes" would also be protected--meaning anyone looking to document what goes on in the ordinary day of a gas fracker, could be slapped with felony charges.
According to TribLive, Ross Pifer, director of the Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center at Penn State University's Dickinson School of Law, said hydraulic fracturing operations could be protected under the new bill because gas companies often lease land from farmers.
"If you view it expansively, you'd have to view it as: Anything that takes place on that land (is protected)," Pifer said.
Melissa Troutman, outreach coordinator at Mountain Watershed Association, which investigates and records fracking activity, said the law would shield any illegal activities conducted by gas frackers from public view.
"If it passes, what's next?" said Troutman. "No documenting commercial or recreational activity? Right now it's legal to photograph industrial operations on public lands. Will that be illegal next?
Attempting to justify his sponsorship of the bill, Haluska claimed that activists only exaggerate criminal abuses inside of factory farms--meaning they should not be able to film what goes on inside. Haluska's words, however, did not serve his purpose: "They take video and say, 'Look, this guy's dragging a cow on a chain with a tractor.' Well, there aren't too many ways of moving a cow."
Matthew Dominguez, the Humane Society of the United States' public policy manager for farm animal protection, stated: "Animal welfare groups have exposed egregious animal cruelty through recordings and photos, and the industry's response hasn't been to clean up its act but to merely make it illegal to expose what's happening. They don't have the right to keep people in the dark. This bill would hinder our ability to expose abuses."
The same will now go for those in the gas fracking industry.
Ag-Gag bills have either been proposed or enacted in roughly a dozen states.
Versions have been passed in Iowa, Utah and Missouri, and are under consideration in Indiana, Nebraska, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Tennessee and Vermont.
_______________________
Jacob Chamberlain
Jacob Chamberlain is a former staff writer for Common Dreams. His website is www.jacobpchamberlain.com.
The same "Ag-Gag" laws that make it a crime to film or document egregious abuses on industrial farms may soon be used to criminalize anti-fracking activists who seek to expose environmental harms brought on by the gas drilling industry--if a bill recently proposed in Pennsylvannia passes.
House Bill 683, sponsored by Rep. Gary Haluska, D-Cambria, would make it a felony to take photos, video or audio on private land used for "agricultural purposes," downloading or distributing any such recordings; and entering agricultural property if one plans on recording.
However, as Pittsburg's TribLive reports, the bill would go even further, in that gas frackers now commonly drilling on land that would otherwise be used for "agricultural purposes" would also be protected--meaning anyone looking to document what goes on in the ordinary day of a gas fracker, could be slapped with felony charges.
According to TribLive, Ross Pifer, director of the Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center at Penn State University's Dickinson School of Law, said hydraulic fracturing operations could be protected under the new bill because gas companies often lease land from farmers.
"If you view it expansively, you'd have to view it as: Anything that takes place on that land (is protected)," Pifer said.
Melissa Troutman, outreach coordinator at Mountain Watershed Association, which investigates and records fracking activity, said the law would shield any illegal activities conducted by gas frackers from public view.
"If it passes, what's next?" said Troutman. "No documenting commercial or recreational activity? Right now it's legal to photograph industrial operations on public lands. Will that be illegal next?
Attempting to justify his sponsorship of the bill, Haluska claimed that activists only exaggerate criminal abuses inside of factory farms--meaning they should not be able to film what goes on inside. Haluska's words, however, did not serve his purpose: "They take video and say, 'Look, this guy's dragging a cow on a chain with a tractor.' Well, there aren't too many ways of moving a cow."
Matthew Dominguez, the Humane Society of the United States' public policy manager for farm animal protection, stated: "Animal welfare groups have exposed egregious animal cruelty through recordings and photos, and the industry's response hasn't been to clean up its act but to merely make it illegal to expose what's happening. They don't have the right to keep people in the dark. This bill would hinder our ability to expose abuses."
The same will now go for those in the gas fracking industry.
Ag-Gag bills have either been proposed or enacted in roughly a dozen states.
Versions have been passed in Iowa, Utah and Missouri, and are under consideration in Indiana, Nebraska, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Tennessee and Vermont.
_______________________
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.