SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
EU Bans Sale of Cosmetics Tested on Animals
A ban on the sale of cosmetics tested on animals takes effect in the European Union on Monday.
The ban applies to the sale all cosmetic products and their ingredients, regardless of their place of origin.
"Today's entry into force of the full marketing ban gives an important signal on the value that Europe attaches to animal welfare," Tonio Borg, European Commissioner in charge of Health & Consumer Policy, said in a statement.
Mar 11, 2013
A ban on the sale of cosmetics tested on animals takes effect in the European Union on Monday.
The ban applies to the sale all cosmetic products and their ingredients, regardless of their place of origin.
"Today's entry into force of the full marketing ban gives an important signal on the value that Europe attaches to animal welfare," Tonio Borg, European Commissioner in charge of Health & Consumer Policy, said in a statement.
BBC News reports:
The 27 EU countries have had a ban on such tests in place since 2009. But the EU Commission is now asking the EU's trading partners to do the same. [...]
Despite the EU's 2009 ban, cosmetics firms were allowed to continue testing on animals for the most complex human health effects, such as toxicity which might lead to cancer. However, those tests now come under the ban too.
Kathy Guillermo, vice president of laboratory investigations at PETA, writes that March 11 will be remembered as a "monumental day for animals, consumers and modern science," and adds that it is not only a win for animals, but for public health:
Because human and animal genetic makeup is vastly different, tests performed on donated human tissue are much more reliable indicators of a chemical's effects than tests done on animals, decreasing the likelihood of a product having adverse effects. For instance, instead of measuring how damaging a chemical is to a rabbit's cornea, manufacturers can drop that same chemical onto human tissue grown in a laboratory and get a much more accurate analysis. And instead of grinding chemicals into an animal's skin for irritancy testing, researchers can use human skin cultures. These and other non-animal tests are also usually less expensive and yield results more quickly than animal tests do, which helps keep consumer costs down.
The Humane Society International (HSI) also lauded the move.
"Testing cosmetics on rabbits and guinea-pigs is the ugly face of the beauty industry," Troy Seidle, Be Cruelty-Free campaign director for HSI, said in a statement. "With the EU closing its doors to animal-tested cosmetics, the beginning of the end of global cosmetics cruelty is within our grasp. EU citizens made it clear that they don't want their mascara or shampoo to have been dripped in a rabbit's eye or force fed to mice in massive doses, no matter where in the world that suffering has taken place. EU policymakers listened, and today is a major moral milestone in the history of ending cosmetics animal testing."
_______________________________
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
A ban on the sale of cosmetics tested on animals takes effect in the European Union on Monday.
The ban applies to the sale all cosmetic products and their ingredients, regardless of their place of origin.
"Today's entry into force of the full marketing ban gives an important signal on the value that Europe attaches to animal welfare," Tonio Borg, European Commissioner in charge of Health & Consumer Policy, said in a statement.
BBC News reports:
The 27 EU countries have had a ban on such tests in place since 2009. But the EU Commission is now asking the EU's trading partners to do the same. [...]
Despite the EU's 2009 ban, cosmetics firms were allowed to continue testing on animals for the most complex human health effects, such as toxicity which might lead to cancer. However, those tests now come under the ban too.
Kathy Guillermo, vice president of laboratory investigations at PETA, writes that March 11 will be remembered as a "monumental day for animals, consumers and modern science," and adds that it is not only a win for animals, but for public health:
Because human and animal genetic makeup is vastly different, tests performed on donated human tissue are much more reliable indicators of a chemical's effects than tests done on animals, decreasing the likelihood of a product having adverse effects. For instance, instead of measuring how damaging a chemical is to a rabbit's cornea, manufacturers can drop that same chemical onto human tissue grown in a laboratory and get a much more accurate analysis. And instead of grinding chemicals into an animal's skin for irritancy testing, researchers can use human skin cultures. These and other non-animal tests are also usually less expensive and yield results more quickly than animal tests do, which helps keep consumer costs down.
The Humane Society International (HSI) also lauded the move.
"Testing cosmetics on rabbits and guinea-pigs is the ugly face of the beauty industry," Troy Seidle, Be Cruelty-Free campaign director for HSI, said in a statement. "With the EU closing its doors to animal-tested cosmetics, the beginning of the end of global cosmetics cruelty is within our grasp. EU citizens made it clear that they don't want their mascara or shampoo to have been dripped in a rabbit's eye or force fed to mice in massive doses, no matter where in the world that suffering has taken place. EU policymakers listened, and today is a major moral milestone in the history of ending cosmetics animal testing."
_______________________________
A ban on the sale of cosmetics tested on animals takes effect in the European Union on Monday.
The ban applies to the sale all cosmetic products and their ingredients, regardless of their place of origin.
"Today's entry into force of the full marketing ban gives an important signal on the value that Europe attaches to animal welfare," Tonio Borg, European Commissioner in charge of Health & Consumer Policy, said in a statement.
BBC News reports:
The 27 EU countries have had a ban on such tests in place since 2009. But the EU Commission is now asking the EU's trading partners to do the same. [...]
Despite the EU's 2009 ban, cosmetics firms were allowed to continue testing on animals for the most complex human health effects, such as toxicity which might lead to cancer. However, those tests now come under the ban too.
Kathy Guillermo, vice president of laboratory investigations at PETA, writes that March 11 will be remembered as a "monumental day for animals, consumers and modern science," and adds that it is not only a win for animals, but for public health:
Because human and animal genetic makeup is vastly different, tests performed on donated human tissue are much more reliable indicators of a chemical's effects than tests done on animals, decreasing the likelihood of a product having adverse effects. For instance, instead of measuring how damaging a chemical is to a rabbit's cornea, manufacturers can drop that same chemical onto human tissue grown in a laboratory and get a much more accurate analysis. And instead of grinding chemicals into an animal's skin for irritancy testing, researchers can use human skin cultures. These and other non-animal tests are also usually less expensive and yield results more quickly than animal tests do, which helps keep consumer costs down.
The Humane Society International (HSI) also lauded the move.
"Testing cosmetics on rabbits and guinea-pigs is the ugly face of the beauty industry," Troy Seidle, Be Cruelty-Free campaign director for HSI, said in a statement. "With the EU closing its doors to animal-tested cosmetics, the beginning of the end of global cosmetics cruelty is within our grasp. EU citizens made it clear that they don't want their mascara or shampoo to have been dripped in a rabbit's eye or force fed to mice in massive doses, no matter where in the world that suffering has taken place. EU policymakers listened, and today is a major moral milestone in the history of ending cosmetics animal testing."
_______________________________
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.
To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.
News & Opinion
Trending
Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit
Privacy Policy