SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
A ban on the sale of cosmetics tested on animals takes effect in the European Union on Monday. (Photo: tonx/flickr)
EU Bans Sale of Cosmetics Tested on Animals
A ban on the sale of cosmetics tested on animals takes effect in the European Union on Monday.
The ban applies to the sale all cosmetic products and their ingredients, regardless of their place of origin.
"Today's entry into force of the full marketing ban gives an important signal on the value that Europe attaches to animal welfare," Tonio Borg, European Commissioner in charge of Health & Consumer Policy, said in a statement.
Mar 11, 2013
A ban on the sale of cosmetics tested on animals takes effect in the European Union on Monday.
The ban applies to the sale all cosmetic products and their ingredients, regardless of their place of origin.
"Today's entry into force of the full marketing ban gives an important signal on the value that Europe attaches to animal welfare," Tonio Borg, European Commissioner in charge of Health & Consumer Policy, said in a statement.
BBC News reports:
The 27 EU countries have had a ban on such tests in place since 2009. But the EU Commission is now asking the EU's trading partners to do the same. [...]
Despite the EU's 2009 ban, cosmetics firms were allowed to continue testing on animals for the most complex human health effects, such as toxicity which might lead to cancer. However, those tests now come under the ban too.
Kathy Guillermo, vice president of laboratory investigations at PETA, writes that March 11 will be remembered as a "monumental day for animals, consumers and modern science," and adds that it is not only a win for animals, but for public health:
Because human and animal genetic makeup is vastly different, tests performed on donated human tissue are much more reliable indicators of a chemical's effects than tests done on animals, decreasing the likelihood of a product having adverse effects. For instance, instead of measuring how damaging a chemical is to a rabbit's cornea, manufacturers can drop that same chemical onto human tissue grown in a laboratory and get a much more accurate analysis. And instead of grinding chemicals into an animal's skin for irritancy testing, researchers can use human skin cultures. These and other non-animal tests are also usually less expensive and yield results more quickly than animal tests do, which helps keep consumer costs down.
The Humane Society International (HSI) also lauded the move.
"Testing cosmetics on rabbits and guinea-pigs is the ugly face of the beauty industry," Troy Seidle, Be Cruelty-Free campaign director for HSI, said in a statement. "With the EU closing its doors to animal-tested cosmetics, the beginning of the end of global cosmetics cruelty is within our grasp. EU citizens made it clear that they don't want their mascara or shampoo to have been dripped in a rabbit's eye or force fed to mice in massive doses, no matter where in the world that suffering has taken place. EU policymakers listened, and today is a major moral milestone in the history of ending cosmetics animal testing."
_______________________________
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
A ban on the sale of cosmetics tested on animals takes effect in the European Union on Monday.
The ban applies to the sale all cosmetic products and their ingredients, regardless of their place of origin.
"Today's entry into force of the full marketing ban gives an important signal on the value that Europe attaches to animal welfare," Tonio Borg, European Commissioner in charge of Health & Consumer Policy, said in a statement.
BBC News reports:
The 27 EU countries have had a ban on such tests in place since 2009. But the EU Commission is now asking the EU's trading partners to do the same. [...]
Despite the EU's 2009 ban, cosmetics firms were allowed to continue testing on animals for the most complex human health effects, such as toxicity which might lead to cancer. However, those tests now come under the ban too.
Kathy Guillermo, vice president of laboratory investigations at PETA, writes that March 11 will be remembered as a "monumental day for animals, consumers and modern science," and adds that it is not only a win for animals, but for public health:
Because human and animal genetic makeup is vastly different, tests performed on donated human tissue are much more reliable indicators of a chemical's effects than tests done on animals, decreasing the likelihood of a product having adverse effects. For instance, instead of measuring how damaging a chemical is to a rabbit's cornea, manufacturers can drop that same chemical onto human tissue grown in a laboratory and get a much more accurate analysis. And instead of grinding chemicals into an animal's skin for irritancy testing, researchers can use human skin cultures. These and other non-animal tests are also usually less expensive and yield results more quickly than animal tests do, which helps keep consumer costs down.
The Humane Society International (HSI) also lauded the move.
"Testing cosmetics on rabbits and guinea-pigs is the ugly face of the beauty industry," Troy Seidle, Be Cruelty-Free campaign director for HSI, said in a statement. "With the EU closing its doors to animal-tested cosmetics, the beginning of the end of global cosmetics cruelty is within our grasp. EU citizens made it clear that they don't want their mascara or shampoo to have been dripped in a rabbit's eye or force fed to mice in massive doses, no matter where in the world that suffering has taken place. EU policymakers listened, and today is a major moral milestone in the history of ending cosmetics animal testing."
_______________________________
A ban on the sale of cosmetics tested on animals takes effect in the European Union on Monday.
The ban applies to the sale all cosmetic products and their ingredients, regardless of their place of origin.
"Today's entry into force of the full marketing ban gives an important signal on the value that Europe attaches to animal welfare," Tonio Borg, European Commissioner in charge of Health & Consumer Policy, said in a statement.
BBC News reports:
The 27 EU countries have had a ban on such tests in place since 2009. But the EU Commission is now asking the EU's trading partners to do the same. [...]
Despite the EU's 2009 ban, cosmetics firms were allowed to continue testing on animals for the most complex human health effects, such as toxicity which might lead to cancer. However, those tests now come under the ban too.
Kathy Guillermo, vice president of laboratory investigations at PETA, writes that March 11 will be remembered as a "monumental day for animals, consumers and modern science," and adds that it is not only a win for animals, but for public health:
Because human and animal genetic makeup is vastly different, tests performed on donated human tissue are much more reliable indicators of a chemical's effects than tests done on animals, decreasing the likelihood of a product having adverse effects. For instance, instead of measuring how damaging a chemical is to a rabbit's cornea, manufacturers can drop that same chemical onto human tissue grown in a laboratory and get a much more accurate analysis. And instead of grinding chemicals into an animal's skin for irritancy testing, researchers can use human skin cultures. These and other non-animal tests are also usually less expensive and yield results more quickly than animal tests do, which helps keep consumer costs down.
The Humane Society International (HSI) also lauded the move.
"Testing cosmetics on rabbits and guinea-pigs is the ugly face of the beauty industry," Troy Seidle, Be Cruelty-Free campaign director for HSI, said in a statement. "With the EU closing its doors to animal-tested cosmetics, the beginning of the end of global cosmetics cruelty is within our grasp. EU citizens made it clear that they don't want their mascara or shampoo to have been dripped in a rabbit's eye or force fed to mice in massive doses, no matter where in the world that suffering has taken place. EU policymakers listened, and today is a major moral milestone in the history of ending cosmetics animal testing."
_______________________________
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.