Feb 25, 2013
Gulf coast residents gathered outside a federal court in New Orleans on Monday as the trial against BP for the 2010 Deepwater Horizon disaster--arguably the worst environmental calamity in US history--began inside.
BP, the U.S. government, and private plaintiffs failed to reach a last-minute settlement before the trial on Sunday, leading US district judge Carl Barbier to warn in opening proceedings that it would likely be a "lengthy trial".
Federal prosecutors opened with a "scathing attack" on the oil giant, Agence France-Pressereports, arguing that BP is guilty of deliberately cutting corners on normal safety procedures on the Deepwater rig--amounting to "gross negligence" and "willful misconduct".
A "gross negligence" ruling could mean fines closer to $17 billion for the company. However, BP's fines could be as low as $5 billion if prosecutors fail to make the case.
Meanwhile, environmental protesters camped outside the courthouse, urging the court to compel payment of the maximum penalties possible under the law.
"This is not just about something that's going to take decades to clean up," said Chris Canfield, vice president of Gulf of Mexico conservation and restoration for the National Audubon Society. "This is about making sure that bad actors are punished for a series of decisions that put profits ahead of people and the environment."
The civil trial at the federal courthouse in New Orleans is designed to determine the direct cause for the disaster, and how much oil was spilled. The court's authority to define the amount of spilled oil the company is responsible for will be used to calculate the size of environmental fines.
BP has previously settled thousands of lawsuits linked to the disaster out of court, including a $4.5 billion plea deal with the US government in which BP pleaded guilty to criminal charges and a $7.8 billion settlement with people and businesses affected by the spill.
Critics have said that BP's settlements pale in comparison to the decades of environmental and economic damage the company has caused.
"The Gulf Coast is still reeling, and people are still waiting for BP to be held accountable for the largest environmental disaster in our nation's history," said Canfield. "The people of the Gulf Coast don't feel justice has been served. There is much work to be done."
_______________________
_______________________
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Jacob Chamberlain
Jacob Chamberlain is a former staff writer for Common Dreams. His website is www.jacobpchamberlain.com.
Gulf coast residents gathered outside a federal court in New Orleans on Monday as the trial against BP for the 2010 Deepwater Horizon disaster--arguably the worst environmental calamity in US history--began inside.
BP, the U.S. government, and private plaintiffs failed to reach a last-minute settlement before the trial on Sunday, leading US district judge Carl Barbier to warn in opening proceedings that it would likely be a "lengthy trial".
Federal prosecutors opened with a "scathing attack" on the oil giant, Agence France-Pressereports, arguing that BP is guilty of deliberately cutting corners on normal safety procedures on the Deepwater rig--amounting to "gross negligence" and "willful misconduct".
A "gross negligence" ruling could mean fines closer to $17 billion for the company. However, BP's fines could be as low as $5 billion if prosecutors fail to make the case.
Meanwhile, environmental protesters camped outside the courthouse, urging the court to compel payment of the maximum penalties possible under the law.
"This is not just about something that's going to take decades to clean up," said Chris Canfield, vice president of Gulf of Mexico conservation and restoration for the National Audubon Society. "This is about making sure that bad actors are punished for a series of decisions that put profits ahead of people and the environment."
The civil trial at the federal courthouse in New Orleans is designed to determine the direct cause for the disaster, and how much oil was spilled. The court's authority to define the amount of spilled oil the company is responsible for will be used to calculate the size of environmental fines.
BP has previously settled thousands of lawsuits linked to the disaster out of court, including a $4.5 billion plea deal with the US government in which BP pleaded guilty to criminal charges and a $7.8 billion settlement with people and businesses affected by the spill.
Critics have said that BP's settlements pale in comparison to the decades of environmental and economic damage the company has caused.
"The Gulf Coast is still reeling, and people are still waiting for BP to be held accountable for the largest environmental disaster in our nation's history," said Canfield. "The people of the Gulf Coast don't feel justice has been served. There is much work to be done."
_______________________
_______________________
Jacob Chamberlain
Jacob Chamberlain is a former staff writer for Common Dreams. His website is www.jacobpchamberlain.com.
Gulf coast residents gathered outside a federal court in New Orleans on Monday as the trial against BP for the 2010 Deepwater Horizon disaster--arguably the worst environmental calamity in US history--began inside.
BP, the U.S. government, and private plaintiffs failed to reach a last-minute settlement before the trial on Sunday, leading US district judge Carl Barbier to warn in opening proceedings that it would likely be a "lengthy trial".
Federal prosecutors opened with a "scathing attack" on the oil giant, Agence France-Pressereports, arguing that BP is guilty of deliberately cutting corners on normal safety procedures on the Deepwater rig--amounting to "gross negligence" and "willful misconduct".
A "gross negligence" ruling could mean fines closer to $17 billion for the company. However, BP's fines could be as low as $5 billion if prosecutors fail to make the case.
Meanwhile, environmental protesters camped outside the courthouse, urging the court to compel payment of the maximum penalties possible under the law.
"This is not just about something that's going to take decades to clean up," said Chris Canfield, vice president of Gulf of Mexico conservation and restoration for the National Audubon Society. "This is about making sure that bad actors are punished for a series of decisions that put profits ahead of people and the environment."
The civil trial at the federal courthouse in New Orleans is designed to determine the direct cause for the disaster, and how much oil was spilled. The court's authority to define the amount of spilled oil the company is responsible for will be used to calculate the size of environmental fines.
BP has previously settled thousands of lawsuits linked to the disaster out of court, including a $4.5 billion plea deal with the US government in which BP pleaded guilty to criminal charges and a $7.8 billion settlement with people and businesses affected by the spill.
Critics have said that BP's settlements pale in comparison to the decades of environmental and economic damage the company has caused.
"The Gulf Coast is still reeling, and people are still waiting for BP to be held accountable for the largest environmental disaster in our nation's history," said Canfield. "The people of the Gulf Coast don't feel justice has been served. There is much work to be done."
_______________________
_______________________
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.