

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
The moose population in Minnesota is in "precipitous" decline, the state's Department of Natural Resources announced on Wednesday, and adds evidence to a recent report documenting the catastrophe climate change has already brought to the nation's wildlife.
An aerial survey conducted in January estimated Minnesota's moose population at 2,760 animals, which marks a 35% decline from last year and a 52% decline since 2010. The plummeting number prompted the DNR to put a halt on this year's and future years' moose hunting seasons until the population could recover.
"The state's moose population has been in decline for years but never at the precipitous rate documented this winter," said Tom Landwehr, DNR commissioner, adding that the hunting that has occurred in the state is not responsible for the population decline. "This is further and definitive evidence the population is not healthy. It reaffirms the conservation community's need to better understand why this iconic species of the north is disappearing from our state."
At the end of January, the National Wildlife Federation (NWF) released the report Wildlife in a Warming World: Confronting the Climate Crisis, which documented how climate change has already pushed the nation's wildlife into crisis, and warned that warming is particularly problematic for moose in northern Minnesota. From the report:
Biologists attribute most of this decline to increasing temperatures: when it gets too warm moose typically seek shelter rather than foraging for nutritious foods needed to keep them healthy. They become more vulnerable to tick infestations, which have proliferated as the region has warmed. Ticks leave moose weakened from blood loss and with hairless patches where they tried to rub off the ticks. Without protective hair, these animals can die from cold exposure in the winter. Individual moose infested with 50,000 to 70,000 ticks--ten to twenty times more than normal--have been documented.
But as Noah Greenwald, endangered species director at the Center for Biological Diversity, notes, these moose are on a long list of animals threatened by climate change.
"Moose in Minnesota are one of the many wildlife species we're at risk of losing to climate change," said Greenwald. "We need to sharply reduce greenhouse gas pollution now to save Minnesota moose, as well as wolverines, polar bears and many other animals."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The moose population in Minnesota is in "precipitous" decline, the state's Department of Natural Resources announced on Wednesday, and adds evidence to a recent report documenting the catastrophe climate change has already brought to the nation's wildlife.
An aerial survey conducted in January estimated Minnesota's moose population at 2,760 animals, which marks a 35% decline from last year and a 52% decline since 2010. The plummeting number prompted the DNR to put a halt on this year's and future years' moose hunting seasons until the population could recover.
"The state's moose population has been in decline for years but never at the precipitous rate documented this winter," said Tom Landwehr, DNR commissioner, adding that the hunting that has occurred in the state is not responsible for the population decline. "This is further and definitive evidence the population is not healthy. It reaffirms the conservation community's need to better understand why this iconic species of the north is disappearing from our state."
At the end of January, the National Wildlife Federation (NWF) released the report Wildlife in a Warming World: Confronting the Climate Crisis, which documented how climate change has already pushed the nation's wildlife into crisis, and warned that warming is particularly problematic for moose in northern Minnesota. From the report:
Biologists attribute most of this decline to increasing temperatures: when it gets too warm moose typically seek shelter rather than foraging for nutritious foods needed to keep them healthy. They become more vulnerable to tick infestations, which have proliferated as the region has warmed. Ticks leave moose weakened from blood loss and with hairless patches where they tried to rub off the ticks. Without protective hair, these animals can die from cold exposure in the winter. Individual moose infested with 50,000 to 70,000 ticks--ten to twenty times more than normal--have been documented.
But as Noah Greenwald, endangered species director at the Center for Biological Diversity, notes, these moose are on a long list of animals threatened by climate change.
"Moose in Minnesota are one of the many wildlife species we're at risk of losing to climate change," said Greenwald. "We need to sharply reduce greenhouse gas pollution now to save Minnesota moose, as well as wolverines, polar bears and many other animals."
The moose population in Minnesota is in "precipitous" decline, the state's Department of Natural Resources announced on Wednesday, and adds evidence to a recent report documenting the catastrophe climate change has already brought to the nation's wildlife.
An aerial survey conducted in January estimated Minnesota's moose population at 2,760 animals, which marks a 35% decline from last year and a 52% decline since 2010. The plummeting number prompted the DNR to put a halt on this year's and future years' moose hunting seasons until the population could recover.
"The state's moose population has been in decline for years but never at the precipitous rate documented this winter," said Tom Landwehr, DNR commissioner, adding that the hunting that has occurred in the state is not responsible for the population decline. "This is further and definitive evidence the population is not healthy. It reaffirms the conservation community's need to better understand why this iconic species of the north is disappearing from our state."
At the end of January, the National Wildlife Federation (NWF) released the report Wildlife in a Warming World: Confronting the Climate Crisis, which documented how climate change has already pushed the nation's wildlife into crisis, and warned that warming is particularly problematic for moose in northern Minnesota. From the report:
Biologists attribute most of this decline to increasing temperatures: when it gets too warm moose typically seek shelter rather than foraging for nutritious foods needed to keep them healthy. They become more vulnerable to tick infestations, which have proliferated as the region has warmed. Ticks leave moose weakened from blood loss and with hairless patches where they tried to rub off the ticks. Without protective hair, these animals can die from cold exposure in the winter. Individual moose infested with 50,000 to 70,000 ticks--ten to twenty times more than normal--have been documented.
But as Noah Greenwald, endangered species director at the Center for Biological Diversity, notes, these moose are on a long list of animals threatened by climate change.
"Moose in Minnesota are one of the many wildlife species we're at risk of losing to climate change," said Greenwald. "We need to sharply reduce greenhouse gas pollution now to save Minnesota moose, as well as wolverines, polar bears and many other animals."