SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
'Shameful': UNESCO Warns Australia Over Destruction of Great Barrier Reef
'Scathing' report says status will be pulled unless damaging shipping, coal and gas projects are halted
Jan 24, 2013
UNESCO's World Heritage Committee issued a "scathing" report about the state of Australia's Great Barrier Reef, warning that unless measures are taken to protect the reef from proposed large-scale coal and gas projects, the reef's status as a World Heritage Site could be stripped within months.
In response, on Wednesday the World Wildlife Fund and the Australian Marine Conservation Society launched Fight for the Reef, a campaign designed to protect the reef's UNESCO status, The Sydney Morning Herald reports. Organizers hope to pressure political leaders to make firm commitments to help prevent further damage to the world's most extensive coral reef system, which is home to 400 types of coral, 1,500 species of fish and 4,000 types of mollusk.
In 2011, UNESCO was "sufficiently concerned" about 45 developments proposed along the Queensland coast that it sent a mission to Australia to investigate threats to the reef large-scale coal and gas projects that would boost shipping over the reef from about 4,000 to 7,000, according to The Sydney Morning Herald.
Australia's Gladstone Observer reports:
UNESCO, in a scathing report about the state of the reef, warned Australia that at the World Heritage Committee's next meeting in June, they would consider categorising the reef as "in-danger"--the World Heritage 'list of shame'--unless there was decisive action.
Fight for the Reef challenged political leaders to address recommendations of the World Heritage Committee including committing at least $500 million over four years to reverse the decline of water quality in the reef, and stop any future construction of new ports; and stop dredging and dumping on the reef's seabed.
But since the report was issued, no federal funding has been made available to address the situation, according to WWF's reef director Nick Heath.
Campaign director Felicity Wishart said:
Building of new ports, expanding existing ones, dredging the breeding and feeding grounds of marine wildlife, dumping the dredge spoil in the World Heritage Area, and significantly increasing the number of ships is happening now, and there are proposals for even further development.
The resulting UNESCO report is "a really alarming international black mark that we could be tracking towards if we don't lift our game," Wishart told the Morning Herald.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
UNESCO's World Heritage Committee issued a "scathing" report about the state of Australia's Great Barrier Reef, warning that unless measures are taken to protect the reef from proposed large-scale coal and gas projects, the reef's status as a World Heritage Site could be stripped within months.
In response, on Wednesday the World Wildlife Fund and the Australian Marine Conservation Society launched Fight for the Reef, a campaign designed to protect the reef's UNESCO status, The Sydney Morning Herald reports. Organizers hope to pressure political leaders to make firm commitments to help prevent further damage to the world's most extensive coral reef system, which is home to 400 types of coral, 1,500 species of fish and 4,000 types of mollusk.
In 2011, UNESCO was "sufficiently concerned" about 45 developments proposed along the Queensland coast that it sent a mission to Australia to investigate threats to the reef large-scale coal and gas projects that would boost shipping over the reef from about 4,000 to 7,000, according to The Sydney Morning Herald.
Australia's Gladstone Observer reports:
UNESCO, in a scathing report about the state of the reef, warned Australia that at the World Heritage Committee's next meeting in June, they would consider categorising the reef as "in-danger"--the World Heritage 'list of shame'--unless there was decisive action.
Fight for the Reef challenged political leaders to address recommendations of the World Heritage Committee including committing at least $500 million over four years to reverse the decline of water quality in the reef, and stop any future construction of new ports; and stop dredging and dumping on the reef's seabed.
But since the report was issued, no federal funding has been made available to address the situation, according to WWF's reef director Nick Heath.
Campaign director Felicity Wishart said:
Building of new ports, expanding existing ones, dredging the breeding and feeding grounds of marine wildlife, dumping the dredge spoil in the World Heritage Area, and significantly increasing the number of ships is happening now, and there are proposals for even further development.
The resulting UNESCO report is "a really alarming international black mark that we could be tracking towards if we don't lift our game," Wishart told the Morning Herald.
UNESCO's World Heritage Committee issued a "scathing" report about the state of Australia's Great Barrier Reef, warning that unless measures are taken to protect the reef from proposed large-scale coal and gas projects, the reef's status as a World Heritage Site could be stripped within months.
In response, on Wednesday the World Wildlife Fund and the Australian Marine Conservation Society launched Fight for the Reef, a campaign designed to protect the reef's UNESCO status, The Sydney Morning Herald reports. Organizers hope to pressure political leaders to make firm commitments to help prevent further damage to the world's most extensive coral reef system, which is home to 400 types of coral, 1,500 species of fish and 4,000 types of mollusk.
In 2011, UNESCO was "sufficiently concerned" about 45 developments proposed along the Queensland coast that it sent a mission to Australia to investigate threats to the reef large-scale coal and gas projects that would boost shipping over the reef from about 4,000 to 7,000, according to The Sydney Morning Herald.
Australia's Gladstone Observer reports:
UNESCO, in a scathing report about the state of the reef, warned Australia that at the World Heritage Committee's next meeting in June, they would consider categorising the reef as "in-danger"--the World Heritage 'list of shame'--unless there was decisive action.
Fight for the Reef challenged political leaders to address recommendations of the World Heritage Committee including committing at least $500 million over four years to reverse the decline of water quality in the reef, and stop any future construction of new ports; and stop dredging and dumping on the reef's seabed.
But since the report was issued, no federal funding has been made available to address the situation, according to WWF's reef director Nick Heath.
Campaign director Felicity Wishart said:
Building of new ports, expanding existing ones, dredging the breeding and feeding grounds of marine wildlife, dumping the dredge spoil in the World Heritage Area, and significantly increasing the number of ships is happening now, and there are proposals for even further development.
The resulting UNESCO report is "a really alarming international black mark that we could be tracking towards if we don't lift our game," Wishart told the Morning Herald.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.