SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
The Bab Al Shams protest village before it was destroyed by Israeli forces (Photo: Bab Al-Shams Facebook page)
Palestine: Continued Settlements Would Leave Us 'No Other Choice' But to Take Israel to ICC
Palestinian Foreign Minister Riad Malki tells UN Security Council that continued settlements in East Jerusalem would be crossing red line
Jan 24, 2013
Continued settlement expansion in Jerusalem would leave us "no other choice" than to take Israel to the International Criminal Court, Palestinian Foreign Minister Riad Malki said on Wednesday.
Speaking at the UN Security Council, Malki said:
If Israel would like to go further by implementing the E1 (settlement) plan and the other related plans around Jerusalem then yes, we will be going to the ICC. We have no other choice. It depends on the Israeli decision.
The proposed E1 area settlements would slice key portions of Palestinian land away from the occupied West Bank and further thwart a two-state possibility. The proposal also sparked the Palestinian protest village of Bab al-Shams, or 'Gate of the Sun' to draw attention to the illegal settlements. The protest village was prompted raided by Israeli forces.
Malki said that settlements in that area would be "trespassing the red lines," and told reporters after the UN meeting that Palestinians are "absolutely not going to tolerate any construction in that particular area."
The UN views all West Bank settlements as illegal, and UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon has said that any "settlement plans for E-1 must be rescinded."
Also on Wednesday, US Ambassador Susan Rice criticized the placard that sat in front of Malki reading "State of Palestine," saying:
[...] in our view, any reference to the 'State of Palestine' in the United Nations, including the use of the term 'State of Palestine' on the placard in the Security Council or the use of the term 'State of Palestine' in the invitation to this meeting or other arrangements for participation in this meeting, do not reflect acquiescence that 'Palestine' is a state.
At the end of November, Palestine was granted non-member observer-state status at the United Nations General Assembly after an overwhelming majority voted to approve the designation.
Rice said Wednesday that the US didn't recognize the November vote "as bestowing Palestinian 'statehood' or recognition."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Continued settlement expansion in Jerusalem would leave us "no other choice" than to take Israel to the International Criminal Court, Palestinian Foreign Minister Riad Malki said on Wednesday.
Speaking at the UN Security Council, Malki said:
If Israel would like to go further by implementing the E1 (settlement) plan and the other related plans around Jerusalem then yes, we will be going to the ICC. We have no other choice. It depends on the Israeli decision.
The proposed E1 area settlements would slice key portions of Palestinian land away from the occupied West Bank and further thwart a two-state possibility. The proposal also sparked the Palestinian protest village of Bab al-Shams, or 'Gate of the Sun' to draw attention to the illegal settlements. The protest village was prompted raided by Israeli forces.
Malki said that settlements in that area would be "trespassing the red lines," and told reporters after the UN meeting that Palestinians are "absolutely not going to tolerate any construction in that particular area."
The UN views all West Bank settlements as illegal, and UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon has said that any "settlement plans for E-1 must be rescinded."
Also on Wednesday, US Ambassador Susan Rice criticized the placard that sat in front of Malki reading "State of Palestine," saying:
[...] in our view, any reference to the 'State of Palestine' in the United Nations, including the use of the term 'State of Palestine' on the placard in the Security Council or the use of the term 'State of Palestine' in the invitation to this meeting or other arrangements for participation in this meeting, do not reflect acquiescence that 'Palestine' is a state.
At the end of November, Palestine was granted non-member observer-state status at the United Nations General Assembly after an overwhelming majority voted to approve the designation.
Rice said Wednesday that the US didn't recognize the November vote "as bestowing Palestinian 'statehood' or recognition."
Continued settlement expansion in Jerusalem would leave us "no other choice" than to take Israel to the International Criminal Court, Palestinian Foreign Minister Riad Malki said on Wednesday.
Speaking at the UN Security Council, Malki said:
If Israel would like to go further by implementing the E1 (settlement) plan and the other related plans around Jerusalem then yes, we will be going to the ICC. We have no other choice. It depends on the Israeli decision.
The proposed E1 area settlements would slice key portions of Palestinian land away from the occupied West Bank and further thwart a two-state possibility. The proposal also sparked the Palestinian protest village of Bab al-Shams, or 'Gate of the Sun' to draw attention to the illegal settlements. The protest village was prompted raided by Israeli forces.
Malki said that settlements in that area would be "trespassing the red lines," and told reporters after the UN meeting that Palestinians are "absolutely not going to tolerate any construction in that particular area."
The UN views all West Bank settlements as illegal, and UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon has said that any "settlement plans for E-1 must be rescinded."
Also on Wednesday, US Ambassador Susan Rice criticized the placard that sat in front of Malki reading "State of Palestine," saying:
[...] in our view, any reference to the 'State of Palestine' in the United Nations, including the use of the term 'State of Palestine' on the placard in the Security Council or the use of the term 'State of Palestine' in the invitation to this meeting or other arrangements for participation in this meeting, do not reflect acquiescence that 'Palestine' is a state.
At the end of November, Palestine was granted non-member observer-state status at the United Nations General Assembly after an overwhelming majority voted to approve the designation.
Rice said Wednesday that the US didn't recognize the November vote "as bestowing Palestinian 'statehood' or recognition."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.