

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Among the various end-of-the-year housekeeping occuring on Capitol Hill, the House GOP failed to pass the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA).
Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.), the Democratic point person on VAWA, condemned the House leadership in a statement calling the failure to take up and pass the Senate's "bipartisan and inclusive" VAWA bill "inexcusable."
Originally passed in 1994, the Act provided funding for the investigation and prosecution of violent crimes against women, imposed automatic and mandatory restitution on those convicted, and allowed civil redress in cases prosecutors chose to leave unprosecuted.
The Act had already expired in September 2011 leaving its programs to run on fumes while lawmakers deadlocked over recent provisions.
Back in April, the VAWA reauthorization passed the Senate easily with a 68 to 31 vote. The bill, which recently incorporated important new protections, including bolstering campus safety and extending protections to our tribal, immigrant and LGBT communities, was co-written by a bipartisan team--Sen. Pat Leahy (D-Vt.) and Sen. Mike Crapo (R-Id.)--and, according to the Maddow Blog, "seemed on track to be reauthorized without much of a fuss, just as it was in 2000 and 2005."
According to the New York Times, the GOP-controlled House objected to the new provisions and responded by passing its own version of the measure (gutted of any protections for gay men, lesbians, American Indians living in reservations, and illegal immigrants who were victims of domestic violence) subsequently gridlocking negotiations.
In an earlier petition urging its passage, Murray wrote:
Unfortunately, the House of Representatives passed an ideological bill that not only excludes these at-risk populations but strips existing protections for vulnerable women.
We should all agree that where a person lives, their immigration status, or who they love should not determine whether or not perpetrators of domestic violence are brought to justice.
A recent report from the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) found that there has been a 64 percent decline in intimate partner violence from 1993 to 2010. In response, Kim Gandy, the President and CEO of the National Network to End Domestic Violence, wrote, "since it became law in 1994, VAWA has surely played a critical role in this remarkable decline."
Proponents of the law hope to revive the law in the new Congress, however The Maddow Blog writes, "in the meantime, there will be far fewer resources available for state and local governments to combat domestic violence."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Among the various end-of-the-year housekeeping occuring on Capitol Hill, the House GOP failed to pass the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA).
Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.), the Democratic point person on VAWA, condemned the House leadership in a statement calling the failure to take up and pass the Senate's "bipartisan and inclusive" VAWA bill "inexcusable."
Originally passed in 1994, the Act provided funding for the investigation and prosecution of violent crimes against women, imposed automatic and mandatory restitution on those convicted, and allowed civil redress in cases prosecutors chose to leave unprosecuted.
The Act had already expired in September 2011 leaving its programs to run on fumes while lawmakers deadlocked over recent provisions.
Back in April, the VAWA reauthorization passed the Senate easily with a 68 to 31 vote. The bill, which recently incorporated important new protections, including bolstering campus safety and extending protections to our tribal, immigrant and LGBT communities, was co-written by a bipartisan team--Sen. Pat Leahy (D-Vt.) and Sen. Mike Crapo (R-Id.)--and, according to the Maddow Blog, "seemed on track to be reauthorized without much of a fuss, just as it was in 2000 and 2005."
According to the New York Times, the GOP-controlled House objected to the new provisions and responded by passing its own version of the measure (gutted of any protections for gay men, lesbians, American Indians living in reservations, and illegal immigrants who were victims of domestic violence) subsequently gridlocking negotiations.
In an earlier petition urging its passage, Murray wrote:
Unfortunately, the House of Representatives passed an ideological bill that not only excludes these at-risk populations but strips existing protections for vulnerable women.
We should all agree that where a person lives, their immigration status, or who they love should not determine whether or not perpetrators of domestic violence are brought to justice.
A recent report from the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) found that there has been a 64 percent decline in intimate partner violence from 1993 to 2010. In response, Kim Gandy, the President and CEO of the National Network to End Domestic Violence, wrote, "since it became law in 1994, VAWA has surely played a critical role in this remarkable decline."
Proponents of the law hope to revive the law in the new Congress, however The Maddow Blog writes, "in the meantime, there will be far fewer resources available for state and local governments to combat domestic violence."
Among the various end-of-the-year housekeeping occuring on Capitol Hill, the House GOP failed to pass the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA).
Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.), the Democratic point person on VAWA, condemned the House leadership in a statement calling the failure to take up and pass the Senate's "bipartisan and inclusive" VAWA bill "inexcusable."
Originally passed in 1994, the Act provided funding for the investigation and prosecution of violent crimes against women, imposed automatic and mandatory restitution on those convicted, and allowed civil redress in cases prosecutors chose to leave unprosecuted.
The Act had already expired in September 2011 leaving its programs to run on fumes while lawmakers deadlocked over recent provisions.
Back in April, the VAWA reauthorization passed the Senate easily with a 68 to 31 vote. The bill, which recently incorporated important new protections, including bolstering campus safety and extending protections to our tribal, immigrant and LGBT communities, was co-written by a bipartisan team--Sen. Pat Leahy (D-Vt.) and Sen. Mike Crapo (R-Id.)--and, according to the Maddow Blog, "seemed on track to be reauthorized without much of a fuss, just as it was in 2000 and 2005."
According to the New York Times, the GOP-controlled House objected to the new provisions and responded by passing its own version of the measure (gutted of any protections for gay men, lesbians, American Indians living in reservations, and illegal immigrants who were victims of domestic violence) subsequently gridlocking negotiations.
In an earlier petition urging its passage, Murray wrote:
Unfortunately, the House of Representatives passed an ideological bill that not only excludes these at-risk populations but strips existing protections for vulnerable women.
We should all agree that where a person lives, their immigration status, or who they love should not determine whether or not perpetrators of domestic violence are brought to justice.
A recent report from the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) found that there has been a 64 percent decline in intimate partner violence from 1993 to 2010. In response, Kim Gandy, the President and CEO of the National Network to End Domestic Violence, wrote, "since it became law in 1994, VAWA has surely played a critical role in this remarkable decline."
Proponents of the law hope to revive the law in the new Congress, however The Maddow Blog writes, "in the meantime, there will be far fewer resources available for state and local governments to combat domestic violence."