SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Economists: US Wages Stagnant for Over a Decade
Overall earnings in 'mostly downward slope' for past forty years
Nov 16, 2012
As wages remain stagnant since 2002, the past ten years have been effectively been a "lost decade for workers," says writer Kevin G. Hall.
Despite adequate coverage of the rise and fall of employment rates, little has been said about the actual rate of earnings, which--after adjusting for inflation--have reportedly declined across most industries and sectors since the Great Recession.
"Equally troubling," Hall writes in the McClatchy report, is that "real wages are now about the same level as they were in December 2005."
According to researchers at the Brookings Institute's Hamilton Project, the median working-age man with a job earns about 4 percent less, when adjusted for inflation, than he did in 1970.
"A key thing is that from the 1970s up to 2000, middle income . . . families didn't get their fair share, but they still saw some growth. Since 2000, nothing," said Heidi Shierholz, a labor economist at the Economic Policy Institute. "This idea of a 'lost decade,' it's already happened. We're well into our next lost decade."
McClatchy writes that there are a number of explanations for the declining earnings:
One is that the Federal Reserve successfully tamed inflation, so wages aren't racing to keep pace with rising prices. Another is the decline in labor unions, whose members enjoyed higher wages and better benefits.
Yet another explanation is that productivity--a worker's output per hour--has improved greatly thanks to computers, automation and other breakthroughs. Productivity's role in falling real wages is a subject of debate in economic circles, partly because workers used to share in the benefits of rising productivity but have shared less so over the past decade.
Regardless, it seems that real wages have been on a mostly downward slope for more than 40 years which--according to New York economist Martin Kohli--makes economic recovery more difficult "because without wage growth, it's harder for Americans to pay down their debts."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
As wages remain stagnant since 2002, the past ten years have been effectively been a "lost decade for workers," says writer Kevin G. Hall.
Despite adequate coverage of the rise and fall of employment rates, little has been said about the actual rate of earnings, which--after adjusting for inflation--have reportedly declined across most industries and sectors since the Great Recession.
"Equally troubling," Hall writes in the McClatchy report, is that "real wages are now about the same level as they were in December 2005."
According to researchers at the Brookings Institute's Hamilton Project, the median working-age man with a job earns about 4 percent less, when adjusted for inflation, than he did in 1970.
"A key thing is that from the 1970s up to 2000, middle income . . . families didn't get their fair share, but they still saw some growth. Since 2000, nothing," said Heidi Shierholz, a labor economist at the Economic Policy Institute. "This idea of a 'lost decade,' it's already happened. We're well into our next lost decade."
McClatchy writes that there are a number of explanations for the declining earnings:
One is that the Federal Reserve successfully tamed inflation, so wages aren't racing to keep pace with rising prices. Another is the decline in labor unions, whose members enjoyed higher wages and better benefits.
Yet another explanation is that productivity--a worker's output per hour--has improved greatly thanks to computers, automation and other breakthroughs. Productivity's role in falling real wages is a subject of debate in economic circles, partly because workers used to share in the benefits of rising productivity but have shared less so over the past decade.
Regardless, it seems that real wages have been on a mostly downward slope for more than 40 years which--according to New York economist Martin Kohli--makes economic recovery more difficult "because without wage growth, it's harder for Americans to pay down their debts."
As wages remain stagnant since 2002, the past ten years have been effectively been a "lost decade for workers," says writer Kevin G. Hall.
Despite adequate coverage of the rise and fall of employment rates, little has been said about the actual rate of earnings, which--after adjusting for inflation--have reportedly declined across most industries and sectors since the Great Recession.
"Equally troubling," Hall writes in the McClatchy report, is that "real wages are now about the same level as they were in December 2005."
According to researchers at the Brookings Institute's Hamilton Project, the median working-age man with a job earns about 4 percent less, when adjusted for inflation, than he did in 1970.
"A key thing is that from the 1970s up to 2000, middle income . . . families didn't get their fair share, but they still saw some growth. Since 2000, nothing," said Heidi Shierholz, a labor economist at the Economic Policy Institute. "This idea of a 'lost decade,' it's already happened. We're well into our next lost decade."
McClatchy writes that there are a number of explanations for the declining earnings:
One is that the Federal Reserve successfully tamed inflation, so wages aren't racing to keep pace with rising prices. Another is the decline in labor unions, whose members enjoyed higher wages and better benefits.
Yet another explanation is that productivity--a worker's output per hour--has improved greatly thanks to computers, automation and other breakthroughs. Productivity's role in falling real wages is a subject of debate in economic circles, partly because workers used to share in the benefits of rising productivity but have shared less so over the past decade.
Regardless, it seems that real wages have been on a mostly downward slope for more than 40 years which--according to New York economist Martin Kohli--makes economic recovery more difficult "because without wage growth, it's harder for Americans to pay down their debts."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.