California's Prop 37: The California Right to Know Genetically Engineered Food Act
Ballot Issues We're Watching
Prop. 37: The California Right to Know Genetically Engineered Food Act
"Requires labeling of food sold to consumers made from plants or animals with genetic material changed in specified ways. Prohibits marketing such food, or other processed food, as "natural." Provides exemptions. Fiscal Impact: Increased annual state costs from a few hundred thousand dollars to over $1 million to regulate the labeling of genetically engineered foods. Additional, but likely not significant, governmental costs to address violations under the measure."
The Basics

Proponents of the proposition say consumers have a right to know if the foods they buy have genetically engineered ingredients; and foods containing genetically engineered ingredients should not be allowed to carry a deceptive label of "natural." The Yes on 37 campaign website is here. To donate, click here.
Opponents of Prop. 37 say it would add "government bureaucracy and taxpayer costs" and would cause lawsuits. The No on Prop 37 campaign website is here.
* * *
Yes on Prop. 37
- As of Oct. 16, the Yes on 37 campaign has raised $7.7 million.
- Some of the biggest donors to the Yes campaign include: Organic Consumers Fund, Dr. Bronner's, Mercola.com and Nature's Path Foods.
- Yes on 37 has been endorsed by groups including the California Nurses Association, the California Democratic Party, the California Labor Federation, the United Farm Workers, the American Public Health Association, Consumers Union, Sierra Club, and Whole Foods.
- As of Oct. 16, the No on Prop. 37 campaign has raised $35.6 million.
- The biggest donors to the No campaign include some of the biggest names in genetically engineered seeds, pesticide production and the biggest food conglomerates: Monsanto, Dupont, Dow Chemical, Pepsico, Con-Agra, Nestle and the Grocery Manufacturers Association. The parent companies of many leading organic brands such as Silk, Horizon and Cascadian Farms are backing the No campaign, a revelation that has angered many consumers.
- No on Prop 37 has been endorsed by the California Chamber of Commerce, the California Business Roundtable and the California Taxpayer Protection Committee.
Public polling on California's Prop 37:
| DATE | POLLSTER | YES | NO | UNDECIDED |
| 10/21-10/28 | California Business Roundtable | 39.1% | 50.5% | 10.5% |
| 10/15-10/21 | USC Dornsife/Los Angeles Times | 44% | 42% | 14% |
| 10/7-10/10 | California Business Roundtable | 48.3% | 40.2% | 11.5% |
| 10/7-10/9 | SurveyUSA | 39% | 30% | 31% |
| 9/17-9/23 | USC Dornsife/Los Angeles Times | 61% | 25% | 14% |
* * *
# # #
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Prop. 37: The California Right to Know Genetically Engineered Food Act
"Requires labeling of food sold to consumers made from plants or animals with genetic material changed in specified ways. Prohibits marketing such food, or other processed food, as "natural." Provides exemptions. Fiscal Impact: Increased annual state costs from a few hundred thousand dollars to over $1 million to regulate the labeling of genetically engineered foods. Additional, but likely not significant, governmental costs to address violations under the measure."
The Basics

Proponents of the proposition say consumers have a right to know if the foods they buy have genetically engineered ingredients; and foods containing genetically engineered ingredients should not be allowed to carry a deceptive label of "natural." The Yes on 37 campaign website is here. To donate, click here.
Opponents of Prop. 37 say it would add "government bureaucracy and taxpayer costs" and would cause lawsuits. The No on Prop 37 campaign website is here.
* * *
Yes on Prop. 37
- As of Oct. 16, the Yes on 37 campaign has raised $7.7 million.
- Some of the biggest donors to the Yes campaign include: Organic Consumers Fund, Dr. Bronner's, Mercola.com and Nature's Path Foods.
- Yes on 37 has been endorsed by groups including the California Nurses Association, the California Democratic Party, the California Labor Federation, the United Farm Workers, the American Public Health Association, Consumers Union, Sierra Club, and Whole Foods.
- As of Oct. 16, the No on Prop. 37 campaign has raised $35.6 million.
- The biggest donors to the No campaign include some of the biggest names in genetically engineered seeds, pesticide production and the biggest food conglomerates: Monsanto, Dupont, Dow Chemical, Pepsico, Con-Agra, Nestle and the Grocery Manufacturers Association. The parent companies of many leading organic brands such as Silk, Horizon and Cascadian Farms are backing the No campaign, a revelation that has angered many consumers.
- No on Prop 37 has been endorsed by the California Chamber of Commerce, the California Business Roundtable and the California Taxpayer Protection Committee.
Public polling on California's Prop 37:
| DATE | POLLSTER | YES | NO | UNDECIDED |
| 10/21-10/28 | California Business Roundtable | 39.1% | 50.5% | 10.5% |
| 10/15-10/21 | USC Dornsife/Los Angeles Times | 44% | 42% | 14% |
| 10/7-10/10 | California Business Roundtable | 48.3% | 40.2% | 11.5% |
| 10/7-10/9 | SurveyUSA | 39% | 30% | 31% |
| 9/17-9/23 | USC Dornsife/Los Angeles Times | 61% | 25% | 14% |
* * *
# # #
Prop. 37: The California Right to Know Genetically Engineered Food Act
"Requires labeling of food sold to consumers made from plants or animals with genetic material changed in specified ways. Prohibits marketing such food, or other processed food, as "natural." Provides exemptions. Fiscal Impact: Increased annual state costs from a few hundred thousand dollars to over $1 million to regulate the labeling of genetically engineered foods. Additional, but likely not significant, governmental costs to address violations under the measure."
The Basics

Proponents of the proposition say consumers have a right to know if the foods they buy have genetically engineered ingredients; and foods containing genetically engineered ingredients should not be allowed to carry a deceptive label of "natural." The Yes on 37 campaign website is here. To donate, click here.
Opponents of Prop. 37 say it would add "government bureaucracy and taxpayer costs" and would cause lawsuits. The No on Prop 37 campaign website is here.
* * *
Yes on Prop. 37
- As of Oct. 16, the Yes on 37 campaign has raised $7.7 million.
- Some of the biggest donors to the Yes campaign include: Organic Consumers Fund, Dr. Bronner's, Mercola.com and Nature's Path Foods.
- Yes on 37 has been endorsed by groups including the California Nurses Association, the California Democratic Party, the California Labor Federation, the United Farm Workers, the American Public Health Association, Consumers Union, Sierra Club, and Whole Foods.
- As of Oct. 16, the No on Prop. 37 campaign has raised $35.6 million.
- The biggest donors to the No campaign include some of the biggest names in genetically engineered seeds, pesticide production and the biggest food conglomerates: Monsanto, Dupont, Dow Chemical, Pepsico, Con-Agra, Nestle and the Grocery Manufacturers Association. The parent companies of many leading organic brands such as Silk, Horizon and Cascadian Farms are backing the No campaign, a revelation that has angered many consumers.
- No on Prop 37 has been endorsed by the California Chamber of Commerce, the California Business Roundtable and the California Taxpayer Protection Committee.
Public polling on California's Prop 37:
| DATE | POLLSTER | YES | NO | UNDECIDED |
| 10/21-10/28 | California Business Roundtable | 39.1% | 50.5% | 10.5% |
| 10/15-10/21 | USC Dornsife/Los Angeles Times | 44% | 42% | 14% |
| 10/7-10/10 | California Business Roundtable | 48.3% | 40.2% | 11.5% |
| 10/7-10/9 | SurveyUSA | 39% | 30% | 31% |
| 9/17-9/23 | USC Dornsife/Los Angeles Times | 61% | 25% | 14% |
* * *
# # #

