Nov 05, 2012
Prop. 37: The California Right to Know Genetically Engineered Food Act
"Requires labeling of food sold to consumers made from plants or animals with genetic material changed in specified ways. Prohibits marketing such food, or other processed food, as "natural." Provides exemptions. Fiscal Impact: Increased annual state costs from a few hundred thousand dollars to over $1 million to regulate the labeling of genetically engineered foods. Additional, but likely not significant, governmental costs to address violations under the measure."
The Basics
Proponents of the proposition say consumers have a right to know if the foods they buy have genetically engineered ingredients; and foods containing genetically engineered ingredients should not be allowed to carry a deceptive label of "natural." The Yes on 37 campaign website is here. To donate, click here.
Opponents of Prop. 37 say it would add "government bureaucracy and taxpayer costs" and would cause lawsuits. The No on Prop 37 campaign website is here.
* * *
- As of Oct. 16, the Yes on 37 campaign has raised $7.7 million.
- Some of the biggest donors to the Yes campaign include: Organic Consumers Fund, Dr. Bronner's, Mercola.com and Nature's Path Foods.
- Yes on 37 has been endorsed by groups including the California Nurses Association, the California Democratic Party, the California Labor Federation, the United Farm Workers, the American Public Health Association, Consumers Union, Sierra Club, and Whole Foods.
- As of Oct. 16, the No on Prop. 37 campaign has raised $35.6 million.
- The biggest donors to the No campaign include some of the biggest names in genetically engineered seeds, pesticide production and the biggest food conglomerates: Monsanto, Dupont, Dow Chemical, Pepsico, Con-Agra, Nestle and the Grocery Manufacturers Association. The parent companies of many leading organic brands such as Silk, Horizon and Cascadian Farms are backing the No campaign, a revelation that has angered many consumers.
- No on Prop 37 has been endorsed by the California Chamber of Commerce, the California Business Roundtable and the California Taxpayer Protection Committee.
Public polling on California's Prop 37:
DATE | POLLSTER | YES | NO | UNDECIDED |
10/21-10/28 | California Business Roundtable | 39.1% | 50.5% | 10.5% |
10/15-10/21 | USC Dornsife/Los Angeles Times | 44% | 42% | 14% |
10/7-10/10 | California Business Roundtable | 48.3% | 40.2% | 11.5% |
10/7-10/9 | SurveyUSA | 39% | 30% | 31% |
9/17-9/23 | USC Dornsife/Los Angeles Times | 61% | 25% | 14% |
* * *
# # #
An Unconstitutional Rampage
Trump and Musk are on an unconstitutional rampage, aiming for virtually every corner of the federal government. These two right-wing billionaires are targeting nurses, scientists, teachers, daycare providers, judges, veterans, air traffic controllers, and nuclear safety inspectors. No one is safe. The food stamps program, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are next. It’s an unprecedented disaster and a five-alarm fire, but there will be a reckoning. The people did not vote for this. The American people do not want this dystopian hellscape that hides behind claims of “efficiency.” Still, in reality, it is all a giveaway to corporate interests and the libertarian dreams of far-right oligarchs like Musk. Common Dreams is playing a vital role by reporting day and night on this orgy of corruption and greed, as well as what everyday people can do to organize and fight back. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Prop. 37: The California Right to Know Genetically Engineered Food Act
"Requires labeling of food sold to consumers made from plants or animals with genetic material changed in specified ways. Prohibits marketing such food, or other processed food, as "natural." Provides exemptions. Fiscal Impact: Increased annual state costs from a few hundred thousand dollars to over $1 million to regulate the labeling of genetically engineered foods. Additional, but likely not significant, governmental costs to address violations under the measure."
The Basics
Proponents of the proposition say consumers have a right to know if the foods they buy have genetically engineered ingredients; and foods containing genetically engineered ingredients should not be allowed to carry a deceptive label of "natural." The Yes on 37 campaign website is here. To donate, click here.
Opponents of Prop. 37 say it would add "government bureaucracy and taxpayer costs" and would cause lawsuits. The No on Prop 37 campaign website is here.
* * *
- As of Oct. 16, the Yes on 37 campaign has raised $7.7 million.
- Some of the biggest donors to the Yes campaign include: Organic Consumers Fund, Dr. Bronner's, Mercola.com and Nature's Path Foods.
- Yes on 37 has been endorsed by groups including the California Nurses Association, the California Democratic Party, the California Labor Federation, the United Farm Workers, the American Public Health Association, Consumers Union, Sierra Club, and Whole Foods.
- As of Oct. 16, the No on Prop. 37 campaign has raised $35.6 million.
- The biggest donors to the No campaign include some of the biggest names in genetically engineered seeds, pesticide production and the biggest food conglomerates: Monsanto, Dupont, Dow Chemical, Pepsico, Con-Agra, Nestle and the Grocery Manufacturers Association. The parent companies of many leading organic brands such as Silk, Horizon and Cascadian Farms are backing the No campaign, a revelation that has angered many consumers.
- No on Prop 37 has been endorsed by the California Chamber of Commerce, the California Business Roundtable and the California Taxpayer Protection Committee.
Public polling on California's Prop 37:
DATE | POLLSTER | YES | NO | UNDECIDED |
10/21-10/28 | California Business Roundtable | 39.1% | 50.5% | 10.5% |
10/15-10/21 | USC Dornsife/Los Angeles Times | 44% | 42% | 14% |
10/7-10/10 | California Business Roundtable | 48.3% | 40.2% | 11.5% |
10/7-10/9 | SurveyUSA | 39% | 30% | 31% |
9/17-9/23 | USC Dornsife/Los Angeles Times | 61% | 25% | 14% |
* * *
# # #
Prop. 37: The California Right to Know Genetically Engineered Food Act
"Requires labeling of food sold to consumers made from plants or animals with genetic material changed in specified ways. Prohibits marketing such food, or other processed food, as "natural." Provides exemptions. Fiscal Impact: Increased annual state costs from a few hundred thousand dollars to over $1 million to regulate the labeling of genetically engineered foods. Additional, but likely not significant, governmental costs to address violations under the measure."
The Basics
Proponents of the proposition say consumers have a right to know if the foods they buy have genetically engineered ingredients; and foods containing genetically engineered ingredients should not be allowed to carry a deceptive label of "natural." The Yes on 37 campaign website is here. To donate, click here.
Opponents of Prop. 37 say it would add "government bureaucracy and taxpayer costs" and would cause lawsuits. The No on Prop 37 campaign website is here.
* * *
- As of Oct. 16, the Yes on 37 campaign has raised $7.7 million.
- Some of the biggest donors to the Yes campaign include: Organic Consumers Fund, Dr. Bronner's, Mercola.com and Nature's Path Foods.
- Yes on 37 has been endorsed by groups including the California Nurses Association, the California Democratic Party, the California Labor Federation, the United Farm Workers, the American Public Health Association, Consumers Union, Sierra Club, and Whole Foods.
- As of Oct. 16, the No on Prop. 37 campaign has raised $35.6 million.
- The biggest donors to the No campaign include some of the biggest names in genetically engineered seeds, pesticide production and the biggest food conglomerates: Monsanto, Dupont, Dow Chemical, Pepsico, Con-Agra, Nestle and the Grocery Manufacturers Association. The parent companies of many leading organic brands such as Silk, Horizon and Cascadian Farms are backing the No campaign, a revelation that has angered many consumers.
- No on Prop 37 has been endorsed by the California Chamber of Commerce, the California Business Roundtable and the California Taxpayer Protection Committee.
Public polling on California's Prop 37:
DATE | POLLSTER | YES | NO | UNDECIDED |
10/21-10/28 | California Business Roundtable | 39.1% | 50.5% | 10.5% |
10/15-10/21 | USC Dornsife/Los Angeles Times | 44% | 42% | 14% |
10/7-10/10 | California Business Roundtable | 48.3% | 40.2% | 11.5% |
10/7-10/9 | SurveyUSA | 39% | 30% | 31% |
9/17-9/23 | USC Dornsife/Los Angeles Times | 61% | 25% | 14% |
* * *
# # #
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.