California's Prop 37: The California Right to Know Genetically Engineered Food Act
Ballot Issues We're Watching
Prop. 37: The California Right to Know Genetically Engineered Food Act
"Requires labeling of food sold to consumers made from plants or animals with genetic material changed in specified ways. Prohibits marketing such food, or other processed food, as "natural." Provides exemptions. Fiscal Impact: Increased annual state costs from a few hundred thousand dollars to over $1 million to regulate the labeling of genetically engineered foods. Additional, but likely not significant, governmental costs to address violations under the measure."
The Basics

Proponents of the proposition say consumers have a right to know if the foods they buy have genetically engineered ingredients; and foods containing genetically engineered ingredients should not be allowed to carry a deceptive label of "natural." The Yes on 37 campaign website is here. To donate, click here.
Opponents of Prop. 37 say it would add "government bureaucracy and taxpayer costs" and would cause lawsuits. The No on Prop 37 campaign website is here.
* * *
Yes on Prop. 37
- As of Oct. 16, the Yes on 37 campaign has raised $7.7 million.
- Some of the biggest donors to the Yes campaign include: Organic Consumers Fund, Dr. Bronner's, Mercola.com and Nature's Path Foods.
- Yes on 37 has been endorsed by groups including the California Nurses Association, the California Democratic Party, the California Labor Federation, the United Farm Workers, the American Public Health Association, Consumers Union, Sierra Club, and Whole Foods.
- As of Oct. 16, the No on Prop. 37 campaign has raised $35.6 million.
- The biggest donors to the No campaign include some of the biggest names in genetically engineered seeds, pesticide production and the biggest food conglomerates: Monsanto, Dupont, Dow Chemical, Pepsico, Con-Agra, Nestle and the Grocery Manufacturers Association. The parent companies of many leading organic brands such as Silk, Horizon and Cascadian Farms are backing the No campaign, a revelation that has angered many consumers.
- No on Prop 37 has been endorsed by the California Chamber of Commerce, the California Business Roundtable and the California Taxpayer Protection Committee.
Public polling on California's Prop 37:
| DATE | POLLSTER | YES | NO | UNDECIDED |
| 10/21-10/28 | California Business Roundtable | 39.1% | 50.5% | 10.5% |
| 10/15-10/21 | USC Dornsife/Los Angeles Times | 44% | 42% | 14% |
| 10/7-10/10 | California Business Roundtable | 48.3% | 40.2% | 11.5% |
| 10/7-10/9 | SurveyUSA | 39% | 30% | 31% |
| 9/17-9/23 | USC Dornsife/Los Angeles Times | 61% | 25% | 14% |
* * *
# # #
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Prop. 37: The California Right to Know Genetically Engineered Food Act
"Requires labeling of food sold to consumers made from plants or animals with genetic material changed in specified ways. Prohibits marketing such food, or other processed food, as "natural." Provides exemptions. Fiscal Impact: Increased annual state costs from a few hundred thousand dollars to over $1 million to regulate the labeling of genetically engineered foods. Additional, but likely not significant, governmental costs to address violations under the measure."
The Basics

Proponents of the proposition say consumers have a right to know if the foods they buy have genetically engineered ingredients; and foods containing genetically engineered ingredients should not be allowed to carry a deceptive label of "natural." The Yes on 37 campaign website is here. To donate, click here.
Opponents of Prop. 37 say it would add "government bureaucracy and taxpayer costs" and would cause lawsuits. The No on Prop 37 campaign website is here.
* * *
Yes on Prop. 37
- As of Oct. 16, the Yes on 37 campaign has raised $7.7 million.
- Some of the biggest donors to the Yes campaign include: Organic Consumers Fund, Dr. Bronner's, Mercola.com and Nature's Path Foods.
- Yes on 37 has been endorsed by groups including the California Nurses Association, the California Democratic Party, the California Labor Federation, the United Farm Workers, the American Public Health Association, Consumers Union, Sierra Club, and Whole Foods.
- As of Oct. 16, the No on Prop. 37 campaign has raised $35.6 million.
- The biggest donors to the No campaign include some of the biggest names in genetically engineered seeds, pesticide production and the biggest food conglomerates: Monsanto, Dupont, Dow Chemical, Pepsico, Con-Agra, Nestle and the Grocery Manufacturers Association. The parent companies of many leading organic brands such as Silk, Horizon and Cascadian Farms are backing the No campaign, a revelation that has angered many consumers.
- No on Prop 37 has been endorsed by the California Chamber of Commerce, the California Business Roundtable and the California Taxpayer Protection Committee.
Public polling on California's Prop 37:
| DATE | POLLSTER | YES | NO | UNDECIDED |
| 10/21-10/28 | California Business Roundtable | 39.1% | 50.5% | 10.5% |
| 10/15-10/21 | USC Dornsife/Los Angeles Times | 44% | 42% | 14% |
| 10/7-10/10 | California Business Roundtable | 48.3% | 40.2% | 11.5% |
| 10/7-10/9 | SurveyUSA | 39% | 30% | 31% |
| 9/17-9/23 | USC Dornsife/Los Angeles Times | 61% | 25% | 14% |
* * *
# # #
Prop. 37: The California Right to Know Genetically Engineered Food Act
"Requires labeling of food sold to consumers made from plants or animals with genetic material changed in specified ways. Prohibits marketing such food, or other processed food, as "natural." Provides exemptions. Fiscal Impact: Increased annual state costs from a few hundred thousand dollars to over $1 million to regulate the labeling of genetically engineered foods. Additional, but likely not significant, governmental costs to address violations under the measure."
The Basics

Proponents of the proposition say consumers have a right to know if the foods they buy have genetically engineered ingredients; and foods containing genetically engineered ingredients should not be allowed to carry a deceptive label of "natural." The Yes on 37 campaign website is here. To donate, click here.
Opponents of Prop. 37 say it would add "government bureaucracy and taxpayer costs" and would cause lawsuits. The No on Prop 37 campaign website is here.
* * *
Yes on Prop. 37
- As of Oct. 16, the Yes on 37 campaign has raised $7.7 million.
- Some of the biggest donors to the Yes campaign include: Organic Consumers Fund, Dr. Bronner's, Mercola.com and Nature's Path Foods.
- Yes on 37 has been endorsed by groups including the California Nurses Association, the California Democratic Party, the California Labor Federation, the United Farm Workers, the American Public Health Association, Consumers Union, Sierra Club, and Whole Foods.
- As of Oct. 16, the No on Prop. 37 campaign has raised $35.6 million.
- The biggest donors to the No campaign include some of the biggest names in genetically engineered seeds, pesticide production and the biggest food conglomerates: Monsanto, Dupont, Dow Chemical, Pepsico, Con-Agra, Nestle and the Grocery Manufacturers Association. The parent companies of many leading organic brands such as Silk, Horizon and Cascadian Farms are backing the No campaign, a revelation that has angered many consumers.
- No on Prop 37 has been endorsed by the California Chamber of Commerce, the California Business Roundtable and the California Taxpayer Protection Committee.
Public polling on California's Prop 37:
| DATE | POLLSTER | YES | NO | UNDECIDED |
| 10/21-10/28 | California Business Roundtable | 39.1% | 50.5% | 10.5% |
| 10/15-10/21 | USC Dornsife/Los Angeles Times | 44% | 42% | 14% |
| 10/7-10/10 | California Business Roundtable | 48.3% | 40.2% | 11.5% |
| 10/7-10/9 | SurveyUSA | 39% | 30% | 31% |
| 9/17-9/23 | USC Dornsife/Los Angeles Times | 61% | 25% | 14% |
* * *
# # #

