SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
California Proposition 30: Temporary Taxes to Fund Education, Guaranteed Local Public Safety Funding
The Basics
A summary of the ballot from the California Secretary of State's office reads (pdf):
"This measure temporarily increases the state sales tax rate for all taxpayers and the personal income tax rates for upper-income taxpayers. These teem portray tax increases provide additional revenues to pay for programs funded in the state budget. The state's 2012-2013 budget plan--approved by the Legislature and the Governor in Jun 2012--assumes passage of this measure. The budget, however, also includes a backup plan that requires spending reductions (known as 'trigger cuts') in the event that the voters reject this measure. This measure also places into the state constitution certain requirements related to the recent transfer of some state program responsibilities to local governments."
Supporters
Supporters of Proposition 30 argue that if the amendment fails, schools and colleges will face $6 billion in cuts already budgeted for next year.
"If we do nothing, the cuts will get deeper," the Yes on Prop 30 website states. "Prop. 30 stops the cuts, provides billions in new funding for our schools starting this year --supporting everything from smaller class sizes to afterschool programs."
Supporters include Gov. Jerry Brown, the League of Women Voters, the California Democratic Party and the California Teachers Association, among others.
As of Oct. 27, the "Yes on 30" campaign had raised approximately $62 million.
The "Yes on 30" Facebook site is here.
Opponents
Opponents of Proposition 30 say the measure would equate to a $50 billion tax hike, that the new revenue "would be available for a wide range of purposes -- including funding existing state programs," and that all Californians would pay the increased sales tax, not just the wealthy.
Opponents include the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, Americans for Responsible Leadership, the National Federation of Independent Business California and the Small Business Action Committee, among others.
As of Oct. 27, the Stop Prop 30 campaign had raised approximately $42 million.
The Stop Prop 30 Facebook page is here.
Public Polling on Michigan's Veto Referendum on the Emergency Manager Law
DATE | POLLSTER | YES | NO | UNDECIDED |
10/14-10/21 | Public Policy Institute of California | 48% | 44% | 8% |
10/11-10/15 | Reason-Rupe | 50% | 46% | 4% |
10/7-10/10 | California Business Roundtable | 49.5% | 41.7% | 8.8% |
* * *
# # #
Trump and Musk are on an unconstitutional rampage, aiming for virtually every corner of the federal government. These two right-wing billionaires are targeting nurses, scientists, teachers, daycare providers, judges, veterans, air traffic controllers, and nuclear safety inspectors. No one is safe. The food stamps program, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are next. It’s an unprecedented disaster and a five-alarm fire, but there will be a reckoning. The people did not vote for this. The American people do not want this dystopian hellscape that hides behind claims of “efficiency.” Still, in reality, it is all a giveaway to corporate interests and the libertarian dreams of far-right oligarchs like Musk. Common Dreams is playing a vital role by reporting day and night on this orgy of corruption and greed, as well as what everyday people can do to organize and fight back. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. |
California Proposition 30: Temporary Taxes to Fund Education, Guaranteed Local Public Safety Funding
The Basics
A summary of the ballot from the California Secretary of State's office reads (pdf):
"This measure temporarily increases the state sales tax rate for all taxpayers and the personal income tax rates for upper-income taxpayers. These teem portray tax increases provide additional revenues to pay for programs funded in the state budget. The state's 2012-2013 budget plan--approved by the Legislature and the Governor in Jun 2012--assumes passage of this measure. The budget, however, also includes a backup plan that requires spending reductions (known as 'trigger cuts') in the event that the voters reject this measure. This measure also places into the state constitution certain requirements related to the recent transfer of some state program responsibilities to local governments."
Supporters
Supporters of Proposition 30 argue that if the amendment fails, schools and colleges will face $6 billion in cuts already budgeted for next year.
"If we do nothing, the cuts will get deeper," the Yes on Prop 30 website states. "Prop. 30 stops the cuts, provides billions in new funding for our schools starting this year --supporting everything from smaller class sizes to afterschool programs."
Supporters include Gov. Jerry Brown, the League of Women Voters, the California Democratic Party and the California Teachers Association, among others.
As of Oct. 27, the "Yes on 30" campaign had raised approximately $62 million.
The "Yes on 30" Facebook site is here.
Opponents
Opponents of Proposition 30 say the measure would equate to a $50 billion tax hike, that the new revenue "would be available for a wide range of purposes -- including funding existing state programs," and that all Californians would pay the increased sales tax, not just the wealthy.
Opponents include the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, Americans for Responsible Leadership, the National Federation of Independent Business California and the Small Business Action Committee, among others.
As of Oct. 27, the Stop Prop 30 campaign had raised approximately $42 million.
The Stop Prop 30 Facebook page is here.
Public Polling on Michigan's Veto Referendum on the Emergency Manager Law
DATE | POLLSTER | YES | NO | UNDECIDED |
10/14-10/21 | Public Policy Institute of California | 48% | 44% | 8% |
10/11-10/15 | Reason-Rupe | 50% | 46% | 4% |
10/7-10/10 | California Business Roundtable | 49.5% | 41.7% | 8.8% |
* * *
# # #
California Proposition 30: Temporary Taxes to Fund Education, Guaranteed Local Public Safety Funding
The Basics
A summary of the ballot from the California Secretary of State's office reads (pdf):
"This measure temporarily increases the state sales tax rate for all taxpayers and the personal income tax rates for upper-income taxpayers. These teem portray tax increases provide additional revenues to pay for programs funded in the state budget. The state's 2012-2013 budget plan--approved by the Legislature and the Governor in Jun 2012--assumes passage of this measure. The budget, however, also includes a backup plan that requires spending reductions (known as 'trigger cuts') in the event that the voters reject this measure. This measure also places into the state constitution certain requirements related to the recent transfer of some state program responsibilities to local governments."
Supporters
Supporters of Proposition 30 argue that if the amendment fails, schools and colleges will face $6 billion in cuts already budgeted for next year.
"If we do nothing, the cuts will get deeper," the Yes on Prop 30 website states. "Prop. 30 stops the cuts, provides billions in new funding for our schools starting this year --supporting everything from smaller class sizes to afterschool programs."
Supporters include Gov. Jerry Brown, the League of Women Voters, the California Democratic Party and the California Teachers Association, among others.
As of Oct. 27, the "Yes on 30" campaign had raised approximately $62 million.
The "Yes on 30" Facebook site is here.
Opponents
Opponents of Proposition 30 say the measure would equate to a $50 billion tax hike, that the new revenue "would be available for a wide range of purposes -- including funding existing state programs," and that all Californians would pay the increased sales tax, not just the wealthy.
Opponents include the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, Americans for Responsible Leadership, the National Federation of Independent Business California and the Small Business Action Committee, among others.
As of Oct. 27, the Stop Prop 30 campaign had raised approximately $42 million.
The Stop Prop 30 Facebook page is here.
Public Polling on Michigan's Veto Referendum on the Emergency Manager Law
DATE | POLLSTER | YES | NO | UNDECIDED |
10/14-10/21 | Public Policy Institute of California | 48% | 44% | 8% |
10/11-10/15 | Reason-Rupe | 50% | 46% | 4% |
10/7-10/10 | California Business Roundtable | 49.5% | 41.7% | 8.8% |
* * *
# # #