Nov 02, 2012
California Proposition 30: Temporary Taxes to Fund Education, Guaranteed Local Public Safety Funding
The Basics
A summary of the ballot from the California Secretary of State's office reads (pdf):
"This measure temporarily increases the state sales tax rate for all taxpayers and the personal income tax rates for upper-income taxpayers. These teem portray tax increases provide additional revenues to pay for programs funded in the state budget. The state's 2012-2013 budget plan--approved by the Legislature and the Governor in Jun 2012--assumes passage of this measure. The budget, however, also includes a backup plan that requires spending reductions (known as 'trigger cuts') in the event that the voters reject this measure. This measure also places into the state constitution certain requirements related to the recent transfer of some state program responsibilities to local governments."
Supporters
Supporters of Proposition 30 argue that if the amendment fails, schools and colleges will face $6 billion in cuts already budgeted for next year.
"If we do nothing, the cuts will get deeper," the Yes on Prop 30 website states. "Prop. 30 stops the cuts, provides billions in new funding for our schools starting this year --supporting everything from smaller class sizes to afterschool programs."
Supporters include Gov. Jerry Brown, the League of Women Voters, the California Democratic Party and the California Teachers Association, among others.
As of Oct. 27, the "Yes on 30" campaign had raised approximately $62 million.
The "Yes on 30" Facebook site is here.
Opponents
Opponents of Proposition 30 say the measure would equate to a $50 billion tax hike, that the new revenue "would be available for a wide range of purposes -- including funding existing state programs," and that all Californians would pay the increased sales tax, not just the wealthy.
Opponents include the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, Americans for Responsible Leadership, the National Federation of Independent Business California and the Small Business Action Committee, among others.
As of Oct. 27, the Stop Prop 30 campaign had raised approximately $42 million.
The Stop Prop 30 Facebook page is here.
Public Polling on Michigan's Veto Referendum on the Emergency Manager Law
DATE | POLLSTER | YES | NO | UNDECIDED |
10/14-10/21 | Public Policy Institute of California | 48% | 44% | 8% |
10/11-10/15 | Reason-Rupe | 50% | 46% | 4% |
10/7-10/10 | California Business Roundtable | 49.5% | 41.7% | 8.8% |
* * *
# # #
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
California Proposition 30: Temporary Taxes to Fund Education, Guaranteed Local Public Safety Funding
The Basics
A summary of the ballot from the California Secretary of State's office reads (pdf):
"This measure temporarily increases the state sales tax rate for all taxpayers and the personal income tax rates for upper-income taxpayers. These teem portray tax increases provide additional revenues to pay for programs funded in the state budget. The state's 2012-2013 budget plan--approved by the Legislature and the Governor in Jun 2012--assumes passage of this measure. The budget, however, also includes a backup plan that requires spending reductions (known as 'trigger cuts') in the event that the voters reject this measure. This measure also places into the state constitution certain requirements related to the recent transfer of some state program responsibilities to local governments."
Supporters
Supporters of Proposition 30 argue that if the amendment fails, schools and colleges will face $6 billion in cuts already budgeted for next year.
"If we do nothing, the cuts will get deeper," the Yes on Prop 30 website states. "Prop. 30 stops the cuts, provides billions in new funding for our schools starting this year --supporting everything from smaller class sizes to afterschool programs."
Supporters include Gov. Jerry Brown, the League of Women Voters, the California Democratic Party and the California Teachers Association, among others.
As of Oct. 27, the "Yes on 30" campaign had raised approximately $62 million.
The "Yes on 30" Facebook site is here.
Opponents
Opponents of Proposition 30 say the measure would equate to a $50 billion tax hike, that the new revenue "would be available for a wide range of purposes -- including funding existing state programs," and that all Californians would pay the increased sales tax, not just the wealthy.
Opponents include the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, Americans for Responsible Leadership, the National Federation of Independent Business California and the Small Business Action Committee, among others.
As of Oct. 27, the Stop Prop 30 campaign had raised approximately $42 million.
The Stop Prop 30 Facebook page is here.
Public Polling on Michigan's Veto Referendum on the Emergency Manager Law
DATE | POLLSTER | YES | NO | UNDECIDED |
10/14-10/21 | Public Policy Institute of California | 48% | 44% | 8% |
10/11-10/15 | Reason-Rupe | 50% | 46% | 4% |
10/7-10/10 | California Business Roundtable | 49.5% | 41.7% | 8.8% |
* * *
# # #
California Proposition 30: Temporary Taxes to Fund Education, Guaranteed Local Public Safety Funding
The Basics
A summary of the ballot from the California Secretary of State's office reads (pdf):
"This measure temporarily increases the state sales tax rate for all taxpayers and the personal income tax rates for upper-income taxpayers. These teem portray tax increases provide additional revenues to pay for programs funded in the state budget. The state's 2012-2013 budget plan--approved by the Legislature and the Governor in Jun 2012--assumes passage of this measure. The budget, however, also includes a backup plan that requires spending reductions (known as 'trigger cuts') in the event that the voters reject this measure. This measure also places into the state constitution certain requirements related to the recent transfer of some state program responsibilities to local governments."
Supporters
Supporters of Proposition 30 argue that if the amendment fails, schools and colleges will face $6 billion in cuts already budgeted for next year.
"If we do nothing, the cuts will get deeper," the Yes on Prop 30 website states. "Prop. 30 stops the cuts, provides billions in new funding for our schools starting this year --supporting everything from smaller class sizes to afterschool programs."
Supporters include Gov. Jerry Brown, the League of Women Voters, the California Democratic Party and the California Teachers Association, among others.
As of Oct. 27, the "Yes on 30" campaign had raised approximately $62 million.
The "Yes on 30" Facebook site is here.
Opponents
Opponents of Proposition 30 say the measure would equate to a $50 billion tax hike, that the new revenue "would be available for a wide range of purposes -- including funding existing state programs," and that all Californians would pay the increased sales tax, not just the wealthy.
Opponents include the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, Americans for Responsible Leadership, the National Federation of Independent Business California and the Small Business Action Committee, among others.
As of Oct. 27, the Stop Prop 30 campaign had raised approximately $42 million.
The Stop Prop 30 Facebook page is here.
Public Polling on Michigan's Veto Referendum on the Emergency Manager Law
DATE | POLLSTER | YES | NO | UNDECIDED |
10/14-10/21 | Public Policy Institute of California | 48% | 44% | 8% |
10/11-10/15 | Reason-Rupe | 50% | 46% | 4% |
10/7-10/10 | California Business Roundtable | 49.5% | 41.7% | 8.8% |
* * *
# # #
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.