California Proposition 30: Taxes to Fund Education, Public Safety
California Proposition 30: Temporary Taxes to Fund Education, Guaranteed Local Public Safety Funding
The Basics

A summary of the ballot from the California Secretary of State's office reads (pdf):
"This measure temporarily increases the state sales tax rate for all taxpayers and the personal income tax rates for upper-income taxpayers. These teem portray tax increases provide additional revenues to pay for programs funded in the state budget. The state's 2012-2013 budget plan--approved by the Legislature and the Governor in Jun 2012--assumes passage of this measure. The budget, however, also includes a backup plan that requires spending reductions (known as 'trigger cuts') in the event that the voters reject this measure. This measure also places into the state constitution certain requirements related to the recent transfer of some state program responsibilities to local governments."
Supporters
Supporters of Proposition 30 argue that if the amendment fails, schools and colleges will face $6 billion in cuts already budgeted for next year.
"If we do nothing, the cuts will get deeper," the Yes on Prop 30 website states. "Prop. 30 stops the cuts, provides billions in new funding for our schools starting this year --supporting everything from smaller class sizes to afterschool programs."
Supporters include Gov. Jerry Brown, the League of Women Voters, the California Democratic Party and the California Teachers Association, among others.
As of Oct. 27, the "Yes on 30" campaign had raised approximately $62 million.
The "Yes on 30" Facebook site is here.
Opponents
Opponents of Proposition 30 say the measure would equate to a $50 billion tax hike, that the new revenue "would be available for a wide range of purposes -- including funding existing state programs," and that all Californians would pay the increased sales tax, not just the wealthy.
Opponents include the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, Americans for Responsible Leadership, the National Federation of Independent Business California and the Small Business Action Committee, among others.
As of Oct. 27, the Stop Prop 30 campaign had raised approximately $42 million.
The Stop Prop 30 Facebook page is here.
Public Polling on Michigan's Veto Referendum on the Emergency Manager Law
| DATE | POLLSTER | YES | NO | UNDECIDED |
| 10/14-10/21 | Public Policy Institute of California | 48% | 44% | 8% |
| 10/11-10/15 | Reason-Rupe | 50% | 46% | 4% |
| 10/7-10/10 | California Business Roundtable | 49.5% | 41.7% | 8.8% |
* * *
# # #
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just four days to go in our Spring Campaign, we are not even halfway to our goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
California Proposition 30: Temporary Taxes to Fund Education, Guaranteed Local Public Safety Funding
The Basics

A summary of the ballot from the California Secretary of State's office reads (pdf):
"This measure temporarily increases the state sales tax rate for all taxpayers and the personal income tax rates for upper-income taxpayers. These teem portray tax increases provide additional revenues to pay for programs funded in the state budget. The state's 2012-2013 budget plan--approved by the Legislature and the Governor in Jun 2012--assumes passage of this measure. The budget, however, also includes a backup plan that requires spending reductions (known as 'trigger cuts') in the event that the voters reject this measure. This measure also places into the state constitution certain requirements related to the recent transfer of some state program responsibilities to local governments."
Supporters
Supporters of Proposition 30 argue that if the amendment fails, schools and colleges will face $6 billion in cuts already budgeted for next year.
"If we do nothing, the cuts will get deeper," the Yes on Prop 30 website states. "Prop. 30 stops the cuts, provides billions in new funding for our schools starting this year --supporting everything from smaller class sizes to afterschool programs."
Supporters include Gov. Jerry Brown, the League of Women Voters, the California Democratic Party and the California Teachers Association, among others.
As of Oct. 27, the "Yes on 30" campaign had raised approximately $62 million.
The "Yes on 30" Facebook site is here.
Opponents
Opponents of Proposition 30 say the measure would equate to a $50 billion tax hike, that the new revenue "would be available for a wide range of purposes -- including funding existing state programs," and that all Californians would pay the increased sales tax, not just the wealthy.
Opponents include the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, Americans for Responsible Leadership, the National Federation of Independent Business California and the Small Business Action Committee, among others.
As of Oct. 27, the Stop Prop 30 campaign had raised approximately $42 million.
The Stop Prop 30 Facebook page is here.
Public Polling on Michigan's Veto Referendum on the Emergency Manager Law
| DATE | POLLSTER | YES | NO | UNDECIDED |
| 10/14-10/21 | Public Policy Institute of California | 48% | 44% | 8% |
| 10/11-10/15 | Reason-Rupe | 50% | 46% | 4% |
| 10/7-10/10 | California Business Roundtable | 49.5% | 41.7% | 8.8% |
* * *
# # #
California Proposition 30: Temporary Taxes to Fund Education, Guaranteed Local Public Safety Funding
The Basics

A summary of the ballot from the California Secretary of State's office reads (pdf):
"This measure temporarily increases the state sales tax rate for all taxpayers and the personal income tax rates for upper-income taxpayers. These teem portray tax increases provide additional revenues to pay for programs funded in the state budget. The state's 2012-2013 budget plan--approved by the Legislature and the Governor in Jun 2012--assumes passage of this measure. The budget, however, also includes a backup plan that requires spending reductions (known as 'trigger cuts') in the event that the voters reject this measure. This measure also places into the state constitution certain requirements related to the recent transfer of some state program responsibilities to local governments."
Supporters
Supporters of Proposition 30 argue that if the amendment fails, schools and colleges will face $6 billion in cuts already budgeted for next year.
"If we do nothing, the cuts will get deeper," the Yes on Prop 30 website states. "Prop. 30 stops the cuts, provides billions in new funding for our schools starting this year --supporting everything from smaller class sizes to afterschool programs."
Supporters include Gov. Jerry Brown, the League of Women Voters, the California Democratic Party and the California Teachers Association, among others.
As of Oct. 27, the "Yes on 30" campaign had raised approximately $62 million.
The "Yes on 30" Facebook site is here.
Opponents
Opponents of Proposition 30 say the measure would equate to a $50 billion tax hike, that the new revenue "would be available for a wide range of purposes -- including funding existing state programs," and that all Californians would pay the increased sales tax, not just the wealthy.
Opponents include the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, Americans for Responsible Leadership, the National Federation of Independent Business California and the Small Business Action Committee, among others.
As of Oct. 27, the Stop Prop 30 campaign had raised approximately $42 million.
The Stop Prop 30 Facebook page is here.
Public Polling on Michigan's Veto Referendum on the Emergency Manager Law
| DATE | POLLSTER | YES | NO | UNDECIDED |
| 10/14-10/21 | Public Policy Institute of California | 48% | 44% | 8% |
| 10/11-10/15 | Reason-Rupe | 50% | 46% | 4% |
| 10/7-10/10 | California Business Roundtable | 49.5% | 41.7% | 8.8% |
* * *
# # #

