SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
A spokesman for Republican Presidential Candidate Mitt Romney and running mate Paul Ryan confirmed Sunday to the Huffington Post their support for sending the responsibility for emergency disaster relief back to the states or privatizing the system. Photo courtesy Romney/Ryan campaign.
Romney-Ryan: Send FEMA "Back to the Private Sector"
As Sandy bears down, campaign confirms support for position
Oct 29, 2012
As Hurricane Sandy slams into the East Coast, sending millions evacuating to shelters and slated to leave massive destruction in its wake, Republican President Candidate Mitt Romney and his running mate, Paul Ryan, on Monday confirmed the ticket's position that federal emergency disaster response should be privatized.
"At least three times, Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan have publicly demanded that the federal government only disburse disaster relief funding if Congress agreed to offsetting budget cuts elsewhere," Aviva Shen wrote Monday in Think Progress. "This would hold desperately-needed disaster relief funding hostage unless Congress agreed to cuts elsewhere in the budget, an extraordinarily difficult prospect even in normal circumstances."
In a speech during the GOP primary, Romney said responsibilties borne by the federal government should be "sent back to the states . and if you can go even further and send idt back to the private sector, that's even better."
Asked by moderator John King if that included disaster relief, Romney continued, "We cannot afford to do those things without jeopardizing the future for our kids."
Ryan Grim of the Huffington Post reported Sunday that a Romney spokesman confirmed this remains Romney's position, noting in an email, ""Gov. Romney wants to ensure states, who are the first responders and are in the best position to aid impacted individuals and communities, have the resources and assistance they need to cope with natural disasters."
GOP Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) initially proposed the controversial plan to require that funding for disaster relief be offset with cuts elsewhere -- despite opposition even from his own party, The Hill reported.
But "Romney and Ryan have repeatedly made it clear they agree with Cantor's position," Scott Keyes wrote Sunday in Think Progress.
Drum, in Mother Jones, concludes that it's impossible to know if a Romney/Ryan administration would actually cut funding for FEMA, but notes, "as president, (Romney) probably wouldn't dare cross Cantor either."
* * *
Â
Why Your Ongoing Support Is Essential
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
As Hurricane Sandy slams into the East Coast, sending millions evacuating to shelters and slated to leave massive destruction in its wake, Republican President Candidate Mitt Romney and his running mate, Paul Ryan, on Monday confirmed the ticket's position that federal emergency disaster response should be privatized.
"At least three times, Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan have publicly demanded that the federal government only disburse disaster relief funding if Congress agreed to offsetting budget cuts elsewhere," Aviva Shen wrote Monday in Think Progress. "This would hold desperately-needed disaster relief funding hostage unless Congress agreed to cuts elsewhere in the budget, an extraordinarily difficult prospect even in normal circumstances."
In a speech during the GOP primary, Romney said responsibilties borne by the federal government should be "sent back to the states . and if you can go even further and send idt back to the private sector, that's even better."
Asked by moderator John King if that included disaster relief, Romney continued, "We cannot afford to do those things without jeopardizing the future for our kids."
Ryan Grim of the Huffington Post reported Sunday that a Romney spokesman confirmed this remains Romney's position, noting in an email, ""Gov. Romney wants to ensure states, who are the first responders and are in the best position to aid impacted individuals and communities, have the resources and assistance they need to cope with natural disasters."
GOP Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) initially proposed the controversial plan to require that funding for disaster relief be offset with cuts elsewhere -- despite opposition even from his own party, The Hill reported.
But "Romney and Ryan have repeatedly made it clear they agree with Cantor's position," Scott Keyes wrote Sunday in Think Progress.
Drum, in Mother Jones, concludes that it's impossible to know if a Romney/Ryan administration would actually cut funding for FEMA, but notes, "as president, (Romney) probably wouldn't dare cross Cantor either."
* * *
Â
As Hurricane Sandy slams into the East Coast, sending millions evacuating to shelters and slated to leave massive destruction in its wake, Republican President Candidate Mitt Romney and his running mate, Paul Ryan, on Monday confirmed the ticket's position that federal emergency disaster response should be privatized.
"At least three times, Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan have publicly demanded that the federal government only disburse disaster relief funding if Congress agreed to offsetting budget cuts elsewhere," Aviva Shen wrote Monday in Think Progress. "This would hold desperately-needed disaster relief funding hostage unless Congress agreed to cuts elsewhere in the budget, an extraordinarily difficult prospect even in normal circumstances."
In a speech during the GOP primary, Romney said responsibilties borne by the federal government should be "sent back to the states . and if you can go even further and send idt back to the private sector, that's even better."
Asked by moderator John King if that included disaster relief, Romney continued, "We cannot afford to do those things without jeopardizing the future for our kids."
Ryan Grim of the Huffington Post reported Sunday that a Romney spokesman confirmed this remains Romney's position, noting in an email, ""Gov. Romney wants to ensure states, who are the first responders and are in the best position to aid impacted individuals and communities, have the resources and assistance they need to cope with natural disasters."
GOP Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) initially proposed the controversial plan to require that funding for disaster relief be offset with cuts elsewhere -- despite opposition even from his own party, The Hill reported.
But "Romney and Ryan have repeatedly made it clear they agree with Cantor's position," Scott Keyes wrote Sunday in Think Progress.
Drum, in Mother Jones, concludes that it's impossible to know if a Romney/Ryan administration would actually cut funding for FEMA, but notes, "as president, (Romney) probably wouldn't dare cross Cantor either."
* * *
Â
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.