SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
(UN photo/John Isaac)
As the United Nations biodiversity conference winds down to its final hours in Hyderabad, India on Friday, an environmental group warns of "false solutions" that favor corporate polluters, while lack of financial commitments by developed countries may put biodiversity goals at risk.
Agence France-Presse reports that the meeting, formally known as the 11th Conference of the Parties to the UN Convention on Biological Diversity (COP 11) "is meant to come up with tangible ways to execute what have become known as the Aichi Biodiversity Targets," biodiversity targets set at the previous convention meeting, COP 10, in Nagoya, Japan.
But the conference is ending with wrangling by developed countries over the funding needed to meet those targets, Inter Press Service reports:
Resource mobilization has been the most contentious area of negotiations at Hyderabad. Developing countries, home to rich biological diversity, are now doubtful that the promise of increasing financial resource flows from developed to developing countries by 2015 will materialize.
Developed countries are firm that a baseline is necessary to determine the sum that is already being spent and that needs to be increased. But developing countries are pushing for commitments on interim figures.
Experts say funding from diverse international and national sources, and across different policy areas, is required to secure the full range of economic and social benefits to be gained from meeting the Aichi targets.
Public funding and private sector investment (still under debate), innovative measures, incentives such as payments for ecosystem services, conservation agreements including with local communities, water fees, forest carbon offsets, and green fiscal policies are among possible sources.
At the same time, environmental group Friends of the Earth International warns against any "false solutions to biodiversity loss" led by corporate influences at the conference that treat nature as a commodity.
Financialization "is a way for corporate polluters to continue destroying biodiversity and threatening indigenous peoples and local communities. If UN talks start favoring the financialization of nature, community and Indigenous peoples' rights will be violated, leading to mass land grabs," stated Isaac Rojas, Friends of the Earth International Coordinator of the Forests and Biodiversity Program.
"The corporate influence on UN talks is extremely worrying. Multinational corporations lobby in favor of approaches which have negative impacts on communities and Indigenous Peoples and do not protect forests and biodiversity. These are false solutions. Instead, we need ways to properly protect traditional knowledge and ownership. For instance we need more community-based forest governance, which is an effective way for local people to help protect their forests as well as the climate," stated Rojas.
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
As the United Nations biodiversity conference winds down to its final hours in Hyderabad, India on Friday, an environmental group warns of "false solutions" that favor corporate polluters, while lack of financial commitments by developed countries may put biodiversity goals at risk.
Agence France-Presse reports that the meeting, formally known as the 11th Conference of the Parties to the UN Convention on Biological Diversity (COP 11) "is meant to come up with tangible ways to execute what have become known as the Aichi Biodiversity Targets," biodiversity targets set at the previous convention meeting, COP 10, in Nagoya, Japan.
But the conference is ending with wrangling by developed countries over the funding needed to meet those targets, Inter Press Service reports:
Resource mobilization has been the most contentious area of negotiations at Hyderabad. Developing countries, home to rich biological diversity, are now doubtful that the promise of increasing financial resource flows from developed to developing countries by 2015 will materialize.
Developed countries are firm that a baseline is necessary to determine the sum that is already being spent and that needs to be increased. But developing countries are pushing for commitments on interim figures.
Experts say funding from diverse international and national sources, and across different policy areas, is required to secure the full range of economic and social benefits to be gained from meeting the Aichi targets.
Public funding and private sector investment (still under debate), innovative measures, incentives such as payments for ecosystem services, conservation agreements including with local communities, water fees, forest carbon offsets, and green fiscal policies are among possible sources.
At the same time, environmental group Friends of the Earth International warns against any "false solutions to biodiversity loss" led by corporate influences at the conference that treat nature as a commodity.
Financialization "is a way for corporate polluters to continue destroying biodiversity and threatening indigenous peoples and local communities. If UN talks start favoring the financialization of nature, community and Indigenous peoples' rights will be violated, leading to mass land grabs," stated Isaac Rojas, Friends of the Earth International Coordinator of the Forests and Biodiversity Program.
"The corporate influence on UN talks is extremely worrying. Multinational corporations lobby in favor of approaches which have negative impacts on communities and Indigenous Peoples and do not protect forests and biodiversity. These are false solutions. Instead, we need ways to properly protect traditional knowledge and ownership. For instance we need more community-based forest governance, which is an effective way for local people to help protect their forests as well as the climate," stated Rojas.
As the United Nations biodiversity conference winds down to its final hours in Hyderabad, India on Friday, an environmental group warns of "false solutions" that favor corporate polluters, while lack of financial commitments by developed countries may put biodiversity goals at risk.
Agence France-Presse reports that the meeting, formally known as the 11th Conference of the Parties to the UN Convention on Biological Diversity (COP 11) "is meant to come up with tangible ways to execute what have become known as the Aichi Biodiversity Targets," biodiversity targets set at the previous convention meeting, COP 10, in Nagoya, Japan.
But the conference is ending with wrangling by developed countries over the funding needed to meet those targets, Inter Press Service reports:
Resource mobilization has been the most contentious area of negotiations at Hyderabad. Developing countries, home to rich biological diversity, are now doubtful that the promise of increasing financial resource flows from developed to developing countries by 2015 will materialize.
Developed countries are firm that a baseline is necessary to determine the sum that is already being spent and that needs to be increased. But developing countries are pushing for commitments on interim figures.
Experts say funding from diverse international and national sources, and across different policy areas, is required to secure the full range of economic and social benefits to be gained from meeting the Aichi targets.
Public funding and private sector investment (still under debate), innovative measures, incentives such as payments for ecosystem services, conservation agreements including with local communities, water fees, forest carbon offsets, and green fiscal policies are among possible sources.
At the same time, environmental group Friends of the Earth International warns against any "false solutions to biodiversity loss" led by corporate influences at the conference that treat nature as a commodity.
Financialization "is a way for corporate polluters to continue destroying biodiversity and threatening indigenous peoples and local communities. If UN talks start favoring the financialization of nature, community and Indigenous peoples' rights will be violated, leading to mass land grabs," stated Isaac Rojas, Friends of the Earth International Coordinator of the Forests and Biodiversity Program.
"The corporate influence on UN talks is extremely worrying. Multinational corporations lobby in favor of approaches which have negative impacts on communities and Indigenous Peoples and do not protect forests and biodiversity. These are false solutions. Instead, we need ways to properly protect traditional knowledge and ownership. For instance we need more community-based forest governance, which is an effective way for local people to help protect their forests as well as the climate," stated Rojas.