SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Baby Mountain Gorilla, Uganda (photo: weesam2010 via flickr)
The "financialization of nature" is a flawed approach to saving biodiversity, an environmental groups warns as representatives from over 170 countries meet at a United Nations biodiversity conference.
In the midst of the United Nations 11th Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Biodiversity, or COP 11, meeting in Hyderabad, India, from Oct. 8 to 19, Friends of the Earth International warns of the corporate approach of treating biodiversity as a market commodity.
"Biodiversity and forests are critical for the survival of people and the planet, and are thus priceless. Our biodiversity needs to be protected, not speculated on by reckless and unaccountable financial markets," says Isaac Rojas, Friends of the Earth International Coordinator of the Forests and Biodiversity Program.
Watchdog group Food & Water Watch has been part of the chorus against this market-based approach. "Much lauded by the banking industry, this 'financialization of nature' reduces the value of water and other life-giving resources to exchangeable financial instruments," the group explained earlier this year.
Rojas' comments comes on the heels of a report finding it would cost $76bn dollars annually to meet conservation targets. Environmental economist Donal McCarthy, who led the study, told the BBC that the amount is "just a fraction of what we as consumers spend on soft drinks each year which is almost half a trillion dollars - the total required for species and sites is less than half of what is paid out in bonuses to bankers on Wall street's biggest investment banks."
"Financialization of Nature, which many corporations are lobbying for, is a recipe for disaster. The takeover of biodiversity by the financial sector must be stopped," Rojas added.
Trump and Musk are on an unconstitutional rampage, aiming for virtually every corner of the federal government. These two right-wing billionaires are targeting nurses, scientists, teachers, daycare providers, judges, veterans, air traffic controllers, and nuclear safety inspectors. No one is safe. The food stamps program, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are next. It’s an unprecedented disaster and a five-alarm fire, but there will be a reckoning. The people did not vote for this. The American people do not want this dystopian hellscape that hides behind claims of “efficiency.” Still, in reality, it is all a giveaway to corporate interests and the libertarian dreams of far-right oligarchs like Musk. Common Dreams is playing a vital role by reporting day and night on this orgy of corruption and greed, as well as what everyday people can do to organize and fight back. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. |
The "financialization of nature" is a flawed approach to saving biodiversity, an environmental groups warns as representatives from over 170 countries meet at a United Nations biodiversity conference.
In the midst of the United Nations 11th Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Biodiversity, or COP 11, meeting in Hyderabad, India, from Oct. 8 to 19, Friends of the Earth International warns of the corporate approach of treating biodiversity as a market commodity.
"Biodiversity and forests are critical for the survival of people and the planet, and are thus priceless. Our biodiversity needs to be protected, not speculated on by reckless and unaccountable financial markets," says Isaac Rojas, Friends of the Earth International Coordinator of the Forests and Biodiversity Program.
Watchdog group Food & Water Watch has been part of the chorus against this market-based approach. "Much lauded by the banking industry, this 'financialization of nature' reduces the value of water and other life-giving resources to exchangeable financial instruments," the group explained earlier this year.
Rojas' comments comes on the heels of a report finding it would cost $76bn dollars annually to meet conservation targets. Environmental economist Donal McCarthy, who led the study, told the BBC that the amount is "just a fraction of what we as consumers spend on soft drinks each year which is almost half a trillion dollars - the total required for species and sites is less than half of what is paid out in bonuses to bankers on Wall street's biggest investment banks."
"Financialization of Nature, which many corporations are lobbying for, is a recipe for disaster. The takeover of biodiversity by the financial sector must be stopped," Rojas added.
The "financialization of nature" is a flawed approach to saving biodiversity, an environmental groups warns as representatives from over 170 countries meet at a United Nations biodiversity conference.
In the midst of the United Nations 11th Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Biodiversity, or COP 11, meeting in Hyderabad, India, from Oct. 8 to 19, Friends of the Earth International warns of the corporate approach of treating biodiversity as a market commodity.
"Biodiversity and forests are critical for the survival of people and the planet, and are thus priceless. Our biodiversity needs to be protected, not speculated on by reckless and unaccountable financial markets," says Isaac Rojas, Friends of the Earth International Coordinator of the Forests and Biodiversity Program.
Watchdog group Food & Water Watch has been part of the chorus against this market-based approach. "Much lauded by the banking industry, this 'financialization of nature' reduces the value of water and other life-giving resources to exchangeable financial instruments," the group explained earlier this year.
Rojas' comments comes on the heels of a report finding it would cost $76bn dollars annually to meet conservation targets. Environmental economist Donal McCarthy, who led the study, told the BBC that the amount is "just a fraction of what we as consumers spend on soft drinks each year which is almost half a trillion dollars - the total required for species and sites is less than half of what is paid out in bonuses to bankers on Wall street's biggest investment banks."
"Financialization of Nature, which many corporations are lobbying for, is a recipe for disaster. The takeover of biodiversity by the financial sector must be stopped," Rojas added.