SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
TEPCO worker (C) explains situation of stricken Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant to the journalists on February 28, 2012 (AFP Photo / Pool /Yoshikazu Tsuno)
TEPCO Avoided Safety Measures for Fear of 'Adding Momentum to Anti-Nuclear Movements'
Fukushima operator admits disaster could have been avoided
Oct 12, 2012
Japanese nuclear utility company TEPCO admitted for the first time Friday that the Fukishima nuclear disaster could have been avoided had the company taken obvious and necessary precautions prior to the meltdown inducing Tsunami of March 2011.
"When looking back on the accident, the problem was that preparations were not made in advance," TEPCO's internal reform task force said in the statement. "It was possible to take action" by implementing sufficient safety measures, the task force said, but the steps were intentionally avoided by the company.
TEPCO added in their statement that they had been afraid that public sentiment would turn against nuclear power if the company had taken public precautions against natural disasters, those which would have subsequently acknowledged the dangers inherent in running a nuclear power plant within an earthquake prone region.
"There was concern that if new severe accident measures were implemented, it could spread concern in the siting community that there is a problem with the safety of current plants," the company stated, adding that any action might have added "momentum to anti-nuclear movements."
The company also said that the safety measure would have interfered with its day to day operations.
The statement, released following TEPCO's first internal reform committee meeting, revealed the first major reversal for the company, which has denied malpractice and defended its handling of the crisis since the tsunami hit.
As the region continues to struggle with the persistent radiation from the nuclear meltdown, and TEPCO battles to maintain safety at the power plant, the company also announced this week that radiation levels have reached severe heights inside the No. 1 reactor, reaching up to 11.1 sieverts per hour of radiation -- levels high enough to cause death after about 40 minutes of exposure.
As of now, workers cannot enter the containment vessel.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Japanese nuclear utility company TEPCO admitted for the first time Friday that the Fukishima nuclear disaster could have been avoided had the company taken obvious and necessary precautions prior to the meltdown inducing Tsunami of March 2011.
"When looking back on the accident, the problem was that preparations were not made in advance," TEPCO's internal reform task force said in the statement. "It was possible to take action" by implementing sufficient safety measures, the task force said, but the steps were intentionally avoided by the company.
TEPCO added in their statement that they had been afraid that public sentiment would turn against nuclear power if the company had taken public precautions against natural disasters, those which would have subsequently acknowledged the dangers inherent in running a nuclear power plant within an earthquake prone region.
"There was concern that if new severe accident measures were implemented, it could spread concern in the siting community that there is a problem with the safety of current plants," the company stated, adding that any action might have added "momentum to anti-nuclear movements."
The company also said that the safety measure would have interfered with its day to day operations.
The statement, released following TEPCO's first internal reform committee meeting, revealed the first major reversal for the company, which has denied malpractice and defended its handling of the crisis since the tsunami hit.
As the region continues to struggle with the persistent radiation from the nuclear meltdown, and TEPCO battles to maintain safety at the power plant, the company also announced this week that radiation levels have reached severe heights inside the No. 1 reactor, reaching up to 11.1 sieverts per hour of radiation -- levels high enough to cause death after about 40 minutes of exposure.
As of now, workers cannot enter the containment vessel.
Japanese nuclear utility company TEPCO admitted for the first time Friday that the Fukishima nuclear disaster could have been avoided had the company taken obvious and necessary precautions prior to the meltdown inducing Tsunami of March 2011.
"When looking back on the accident, the problem was that preparations were not made in advance," TEPCO's internal reform task force said in the statement. "It was possible to take action" by implementing sufficient safety measures, the task force said, but the steps were intentionally avoided by the company.
TEPCO added in their statement that they had been afraid that public sentiment would turn against nuclear power if the company had taken public precautions against natural disasters, those which would have subsequently acknowledged the dangers inherent in running a nuclear power plant within an earthquake prone region.
"There was concern that if new severe accident measures were implemented, it could spread concern in the siting community that there is a problem with the safety of current plants," the company stated, adding that any action might have added "momentum to anti-nuclear movements."
The company also said that the safety measure would have interfered with its day to day operations.
The statement, released following TEPCO's first internal reform committee meeting, revealed the first major reversal for the company, which has denied malpractice and defended its handling of the crisis since the tsunami hit.
As the region continues to struggle with the persistent radiation from the nuclear meltdown, and TEPCO battles to maintain safety at the power plant, the company also announced this week that radiation levels have reached severe heights inside the No. 1 reactor, reaching up to 11.1 sieverts per hour of radiation -- levels high enough to cause death after about 40 minutes of exposure.
As of now, workers cannot enter the containment vessel.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.