

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld a $18.2 billion judgement against Chevron Corp., in which the second-largest U.S. oil company was found to have polluted parts ofthe Amazonian jungle for nearly 30 years.
The court did not offer any reason for its decision, Reuters reported.
Indigenous groups and farmers in Ecuador's Lago Agrio region claim that Texaco, which was bought by Chevron in 2001, contaminated the area, in the Amazon jungle, between 1964 and 1992.
Tuesday's decision is only the latest in a long series of legal rulings in the case. It rejects an appeal by Chevron of a lower court ruling, which threw out an injunction blocking enforcement of an injunction by an Ecuadoran court.
Chevron says the February 2011 judgment by an Ecuadorian court was fraudulent and could not be enforced under New York law, according to Reuters.
Chevron called the Ecuadoran court order a "product of bribery, fraud," Agence French-Presse reported Wednesday.
In a statement emailed to Reuters, Chevron said, ""While Chevron is disappointed that the Court denied our petition, we will continue to defend against the plaintiffs' lawyers' attempts to enforce the fraudulent Ecuadorean judgment, and to further expose their misconduct."
The plaintiffs have filed lawsuits in Canada and Brazil to go after the company's assets in third countries, saying Chevron has virtually no assets in Ecuador that could be seized, according to Agence French-Presse.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld a $18.2 billion judgement against Chevron Corp., in which the second-largest U.S. oil company was found to have polluted parts ofthe Amazonian jungle for nearly 30 years.
The court did not offer any reason for its decision, Reuters reported.
Indigenous groups and farmers in Ecuador's Lago Agrio region claim that Texaco, which was bought by Chevron in 2001, contaminated the area, in the Amazon jungle, between 1964 and 1992.
Tuesday's decision is only the latest in a long series of legal rulings in the case. It rejects an appeal by Chevron of a lower court ruling, which threw out an injunction blocking enforcement of an injunction by an Ecuadoran court.
Chevron says the February 2011 judgment by an Ecuadorian court was fraudulent and could not be enforced under New York law, according to Reuters.
Chevron called the Ecuadoran court order a "product of bribery, fraud," Agence French-Presse reported Wednesday.
In a statement emailed to Reuters, Chevron said, ""While Chevron is disappointed that the Court denied our petition, we will continue to defend against the plaintiffs' lawyers' attempts to enforce the fraudulent Ecuadorean judgment, and to further expose their misconduct."
The plaintiffs have filed lawsuits in Canada and Brazil to go after the company's assets in third countries, saying Chevron has virtually no assets in Ecuador that could be seized, according to Agence French-Presse.
The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld a $18.2 billion judgement against Chevron Corp., in which the second-largest U.S. oil company was found to have polluted parts ofthe Amazonian jungle for nearly 30 years.
The court did not offer any reason for its decision, Reuters reported.
Indigenous groups and farmers in Ecuador's Lago Agrio region claim that Texaco, which was bought by Chevron in 2001, contaminated the area, in the Amazon jungle, between 1964 and 1992.
Tuesday's decision is only the latest in a long series of legal rulings in the case. It rejects an appeal by Chevron of a lower court ruling, which threw out an injunction blocking enforcement of an injunction by an Ecuadoran court.
Chevron says the February 2011 judgment by an Ecuadorian court was fraudulent and could not be enforced under New York law, according to Reuters.
Chevron called the Ecuadoran court order a "product of bribery, fraud," Agence French-Presse reported Wednesday.
In a statement emailed to Reuters, Chevron said, ""While Chevron is disappointed that the Court denied our petition, we will continue to defend against the plaintiffs' lawyers' attempts to enforce the fraudulent Ecuadorean judgment, and to further expose their misconduct."
The plaintiffs have filed lawsuits in Canada and Brazil to go after the company's assets in third countries, saying Chevron has virtually no assets in Ecuador that could be seized, according to Agence French-Presse.