

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
New surveillance technology, including recently advanced HD closed-circuit television (CCTV) now utilized by UK law enforcement, has surpassed any ability to regulate privacy infringement, according to the UK's first surveillance commissioner Andrew Rennison. New high-definition cameras, which can identifying and track a person's face from half a mile away, are now being used throughout the UK without the knowledge of the general public.
Surveillance technology in the UK has become so prevalent that the country may be infringing on human rights, Rennison told the Independent Wednesday.
"I'm convinced that if we don't regulate it properly - ie, the technological ability to use millions of images we capture - there will be a huge public backlash. It is the Big Brother scenario playing out large. It's the ability to pick out your face in a crowd from a camera which is probably half a mile away."
Rennison, the country's first Surveillance Commissioner, was assigned by the Home Office to oversee the introduction of the country's first official code of conduct for CCTV use and will report back to Parliament in April.
As of now Rennison believes UK surveillance my not be in compliance with Article 8 of the Human Rights Act, or the protection of "private and family life."
Big Brother Watch, a UK privacy watchdog group, reports that the UK currently has 51,600 CCTV cameras in use by 428 local authorities. 100,000 more are used in schools, and more than one million cameras are installed on private land.
For the Guardian today Henry Porter writes:
All the cameras currently operating "for your security" can be updated and converted to recognize faces. Wherever you go, someone will be logging your movements - whether it is the police or the big supermarket chains that are anxious to monitor the behavior of customers in their stores. But the vital fact to remember is that all private CCTV cameras may be accessed by the authorities and are therefore, in effect, part of the state's surveillance system.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
New surveillance technology, including recently advanced HD closed-circuit television (CCTV) now utilized by UK law enforcement, has surpassed any ability to regulate privacy infringement, according to the UK's first surveillance commissioner Andrew Rennison. New high-definition cameras, which can identifying and track a person's face from half a mile away, are now being used throughout the UK without the knowledge of the general public.
Surveillance technology in the UK has become so prevalent that the country may be infringing on human rights, Rennison told the Independent Wednesday.
"I'm convinced that if we don't regulate it properly - ie, the technological ability to use millions of images we capture - there will be a huge public backlash. It is the Big Brother scenario playing out large. It's the ability to pick out your face in a crowd from a camera which is probably half a mile away."
Rennison, the country's first Surveillance Commissioner, was assigned by the Home Office to oversee the introduction of the country's first official code of conduct for CCTV use and will report back to Parliament in April.
As of now Rennison believes UK surveillance my not be in compliance with Article 8 of the Human Rights Act, or the protection of "private and family life."
Big Brother Watch, a UK privacy watchdog group, reports that the UK currently has 51,600 CCTV cameras in use by 428 local authorities. 100,000 more are used in schools, and more than one million cameras are installed on private land.
For the Guardian today Henry Porter writes:
All the cameras currently operating "for your security" can be updated and converted to recognize faces. Wherever you go, someone will be logging your movements - whether it is the police or the big supermarket chains that are anxious to monitor the behavior of customers in their stores. But the vital fact to remember is that all private CCTV cameras may be accessed by the authorities and are therefore, in effect, part of the state's surveillance system.
New surveillance technology, including recently advanced HD closed-circuit television (CCTV) now utilized by UK law enforcement, has surpassed any ability to regulate privacy infringement, according to the UK's first surveillance commissioner Andrew Rennison. New high-definition cameras, which can identifying and track a person's face from half a mile away, are now being used throughout the UK without the knowledge of the general public.
Surveillance technology in the UK has become so prevalent that the country may be infringing on human rights, Rennison told the Independent Wednesday.
"I'm convinced that if we don't regulate it properly - ie, the technological ability to use millions of images we capture - there will be a huge public backlash. It is the Big Brother scenario playing out large. It's the ability to pick out your face in a crowd from a camera which is probably half a mile away."
Rennison, the country's first Surveillance Commissioner, was assigned by the Home Office to oversee the introduction of the country's first official code of conduct for CCTV use and will report back to Parliament in April.
As of now Rennison believes UK surveillance my not be in compliance with Article 8 of the Human Rights Act, or the protection of "private and family life."
Big Brother Watch, a UK privacy watchdog group, reports that the UK currently has 51,600 CCTV cameras in use by 428 local authorities. 100,000 more are used in schools, and more than one million cameras are installed on private land.
For the Guardian today Henry Porter writes:
All the cameras currently operating "for your security" can be updated and converted to recognize faces. Wherever you go, someone will be logging your movements - whether it is the police or the big supermarket chains that are anxious to monitor the behavior of customers in their stores. But the vital fact to remember is that all private CCTV cameras may be accessed by the authorities and are therefore, in effect, part of the state's surveillance system.