
photo: KCIvey via Flickr
Judge Halts Pennsylvania's Controversial Voter ID Law
A judge has halted Pennsylvania's controversial voter ID law on Tuesday, the Associated Press reports, so it will not be in effect for this year's election.
The PIttsburgh Post-Gazette adds that the ruling from Commonwealth Judge Robert Simpson is a "partial injunction":
Voters will still be asked to present a valid ID, and if they don't have one, will have to cast a provisional ballot.
Wendy Weiser, democracy program director of the Brennan Center for Justice, lauded the decision.
"Today's decision is a clear victory for Pennsylvania voters and the cause of voting rights across the country. As the Commonwealth Court ruled, implementing a sweeping new voter ID law so close to an election would prevent eligible citizens from voting and having their say in our democracy. We are pleased the Court refused to allow politicians to manipulate the system for their own benefit by rushing through new voting requirements that would keep out legitimate voters. Now, we must ensure voters are informed of their rights and poll workers are trained properly so no voter is turned away because they don't have ID," stated Weiser.
A lawsuit brought by groups including the ACLU of Pennsylvania had charged that the voter ID law "violates the Pennsylvania Constitution by depriving citizens of their most fundamental constitutional right -- the right to vote."
But the battle is not over.
Simpson's decision can be appealed back to the state Supreme Court, which is scheduled to meet next on Oct. 15, CBS reports.
Election officials had reported that 750,000 registered voters in Pennsylvania may be disenfranchised under the state's voter ID law.
\u201c#VoterID WIN! Judge Simpson rules qualified voters CAN VOTE NORMALLY even without photo ID. State will likely appeal. https://t.co/8XxJiWk8\u201d— ACLU of Pennsylvania (@ACLU of Pennsylvania) 1349186884
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. The final deadline for our crucial Summer Campaign fundraising drive is just days away, and we’re falling short of our must-hit goal. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
A judge has halted Pennsylvania's controversial voter ID law on Tuesday, the Associated Press reports, so it will not be in effect for this year's election.
The PIttsburgh Post-Gazette adds that the ruling from Commonwealth Judge Robert Simpson is a "partial injunction":
Voters will still be asked to present a valid ID, and if they don't have one, will have to cast a provisional ballot.
Wendy Weiser, democracy program director of the Brennan Center for Justice, lauded the decision.
"Today's decision is a clear victory for Pennsylvania voters and the cause of voting rights across the country. As the Commonwealth Court ruled, implementing a sweeping new voter ID law so close to an election would prevent eligible citizens from voting and having their say in our democracy. We are pleased the Court refused to allow politicians to manipulate the system for their own benefit by rushing through new voting requirements that would keep out legitimate voters. Now, we must ensure voters are informed of their rights and poll workers are trained properly so no voter is turned away because they don't have ID," stated Weiser.
A lawsuit brought by groups including the ACLU of Pennsylvania had charged that the voter ID law "violates the Pennsylvania Constitution by depriving citizens of their most fundamental constitutional right -- the right to vote."
But the battle is not over.
Simpson's decision can be appealed back to the state Supreme Court, which is scheduled to meet next on Oct. 15, CBS reports.
Election officials had reported that 750,000 registered voters in Pennsylvania may be disenfranchised under the state's voter ID law.
\u201c#VoterID WIN! Judge Simpson rules qualified voters CAN VOTE NORMALLY even without photo ID. State will likely appeal. https://t.co/8XxJiWk8\u201d— ACLU of Pennsylvania (@ACLU of Pennsylvania) 1349186884
A judge has halted Pennsylvania's controversial voter ID law on Tuesday, the Associated Press reports, so it will not be in effect for this year's election.
The PIttsburgh Post-Gazette adds that the ruling from Commonwealth Judge Robert Simpson is a "partial injunction":
Voters will still be asked to present a valid ID, and if they don't have one, will have to cast a provisional ballot.
Wendy Weiser, democracy program director of the Brennan Center for Justice, lauded the decision.
"Today's decision is a clear victory for Pennsylvania voters and the cause of voting rights across the country. As the Commonwealth Court ruled, implementing a sweeping new voter ID law so close to an election would prevent eligible citizens from voting and having their say in our democracy. We are pleased the Court refused to allow politicians to manipulate the system for their own benefit by rushing through new voting requirements that would keep out legitimate voters. Now, we must ensure voters are informed of their rights and poll workers are trained properly so no voter is turned away because they don't have ID," stated Weiser.
A lawsuit brought by groups including the ACLU of Pennsylvania had charged that the voter ID law "violates the Pennsylvania Constitution by depriving citizens of their most fundamental constitutional right -- the right to vote."
But the battle is not over.
Simpson's decision can be appealed back to the state Supreme Court, which is scheduled to meet next on Oct. 15, CBS reports.
Election officials had reported that 750,000 registered voters in Pennsylvania may be disenfranchised under the state's voter ID law.
\u201c#VoterID WIN! Judge Simpson rules qualified voters CAN VOTE NORMALLY even without photo ID. State will likely appeal. https://t.co/8XxJiWk8\u201d— ACLU of Pennsylvania (@ACLU of Pennsylvania) 1349186884