SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
In Afghanistan, a War with No Plan for Peace Continues
Reports indicate US has given up on serious peace talks as NATO looks for early exit
Oct 02, 2012
A series of confessions this week from top US and NATO officials leave dim hopes for a negotiated peace settlement in Afghanistan as western nations head for the exit doors with no plans in place for a stable transition to Afghan rule after 2014.
The New York Times reports Tuesday that both "American generals and civilian officials acknowledge that they have all but written of" the idea of peace talks with the Taliban.
"I don't see it happening in the next couple years," said a senior coalition officer who spoke to the Times on the condition of anonymity.
"It's a very resilient enemy, and I'm not going to tell you it's not," the officer said. "It will be a constant battle, and it will be for years."
The Times report follows on the heals of a Guardian exclusive interview on Monday with NATO secretary-general Anders Fogh Rasmussen, who said that the spate of internal so-called "green on blue" killings had sapped the morale of the European alliance and that an earlier than expected withdrawal is under consideration.
"There's no doubt insider attacks have undermined trust and confidence, absolutely," Rasmussen told the Guardian. "From now until the end of 2014 you may see adaptation of our presence. Our troops can redeploy, take on other tasks, or even withdraw, or we can reduce the number of foreign troops."
At the beginning of the week, the top US commander in Afghanistan, Gen. John Allen, told CBS' 60 Minutes that Taliban forces were making a "strong comeback" in Afghanistan and that the recent insider killings had made him "mad as hell."But, he said when prompted, the American people should expect to see more of this in the future.
NATO's Rasmussen also confirmed Allen's suspicion that the insider attacks were not aberrations, but a coordinated strategy by the Taliban and one they now know has been a tactical success.
"It's safe to say that a significant part of the insider attacks are due to Taliban tactics," he said.
Such successful infiltration of the Afghan security forces deeply undercuts the US/NATO strategy to build a reliable military capacity for the ruling Karzai government, an essential ingredient, as was often repeated by US strategists and officials, for the planned drawdown of troops by 2014.
And the New York Times reports that the "failure to broker meaningful talks with the Taliban underscores the fragility of the military gains claimed during the surge of American troops ordered by President Obama in 2009." Designed to "batter" the enemy into peace talks, as the Times put it, the military pressure exerted by the US was largely absorbed by the Taliban forces.
"With the end of this year's fighting season, the Taliban have weathered the biggest push the American-led coalition is going to make against them," the report said.
# # #
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
A series of confessions this week from top US and NATO officials leave dim hopes for a negotiated peace settlement in Afghanistan as western nations head for the exit doors with no plans in place for a stable transition to Afghan rule after 2014.
The New York Times reports Tuesday that both "American generals and civilian officials acknowledge that they have all but written of" the idea of peace talks with the Taliban.
"I don't see it happening in the next couple years," said a senior coalition officer who spoke to the Times on the condition of anonymity.
"It's a very resilient enemy, and I'm not going to tell you it's not," the officer said. "It will be a constant battle, and it will be for years."
The Times report follows on the heals of a Guardian exclusive interview on Monday with NATO secretary-general Anders Fogh Rasmussen, who said that the spate of internal so-called "green on blue" killings had sapped the morale of the European alliance and that an earlier than expected withdrawal is under consideration.
"There's no doubt insider attacks have undermined trust and confidence, absolutely," Rasmussen told the Guardian. "From now until the end of 2014 you may see adaptation of our presence. Our troops can redeploy, take on other tasks, or even withdraw, or we can reduce the number of foreign troops."
At the beginning of the week, the top US commander in Afghanistan, Gen. John Allen, told CBS' 60 Minutes that Taliban forces were making a "strong comeback" in Afghanistan and that the recent insider killings had made him "mad as hell."But, he said when prompted, the American people should expect to see more of this in the future.
NATO's Rasmussen also confirmed Allen's suspicion that the insider attacks were not aberrations, but a coordinated strategy by the Taliban and one they now know has been a tactical success.
"It's safe to say that a significant part of the insider attacks are due to Taliban tactics," he said.
Such successful infiltration of the Afghan security forces deeply undercuts the US/NATO strategy to build a reliable military capacity for the ruling Karzai government, an essential ingredient, as was often repeated by US strategists and officials, for the planned drawdown of troops by 2014.
And the New York Times reports that the "failure to broker meaningful talks with the Taliban underscores the fragility of the military gains claimed during the surge of American troops ordered by President Obama in 2009." Designed to "batter" the enemy into peace talks, as the Times put it, the military pressure exerted by the US was largely absorbed by the Taliban forces.
"With the end of this year's fighting season, the Taliban have weathered the biggest push the American-led coalition is going to make against them," the report said.
# # #
A series of confessions this week from top US and NATO officials leave dim hopes for a negotiated peace settlement in Afghanistan as western nations head for the exit doors with no plans in place for a stable transition to Afghan rule after 2014.
The New York Times reports Tuesday that both "American generals and civilian officials acknowledge that they have all but written of" the idea of peace talks with the Taliban.
"I don't see it happening in the next couple years," said a senior coalition officer who spoke to the Times on the condition of anonymity.
"It's a very resilient enemy, and I'm not going to tell you it's not," the officer said. "It will be a constant battle, and it will be for years."
The Times report follows on the heals of a Guardian exclusive interview on Monday with NATO secretary-general Anders Fogh Rasmussen, who said that the spate of internal so-called "green on blue" killings had sapped the morale of the European alliance and that an earlier than expected withdrawal is under consideration.
"There's no doubt insider attacks have undermined trust and confidence, absolutely," Rasmussen told the Guardian. "From now until the end of 2014 you may see adaptation of our presence. Our troops can redeploy, take on other tasks, or even withdraw, or we can reduce the number of foreign troops."
At the beginning of the week, the top US commander in Afghanistan, Gen. John Allen, told CBS' 60 Minutes that Taliban forces were making a "strong comeback" in Afghanistan and that the recent insider killings had made him "mad as hell."But, he said when prompted, the American people should expect to see more of this in the future.
NATO's Rasmussen also confirmed Allen's suspicion that the insider attacks were not aberrations, but a coordinated strategy by the Taliban and one they now know has been a tactical success.
"It's safe to say that a significant part of the insider attacks are due to Taliban tactics," he said.
Such successful infiltration of the Afghan security forces deeply undercuts the US/NATO strategy to build a reliable military capacity for the ruling Karzai government, an essential ingredient, as was often repeated by US strategists and officials, for the planned drawdown of troops by 2014.
And the New York Times reports that the "failure to broker meaningful talks with the Taliban underscores the fragility of the military gains claimed during the surge of American troops ordered by President Obama in 2009." Designed to "batter" the enemy into peace talks, as the Times put it, the military pressure exerted by the US was largely absorbed by the Taliban forces.
"With the end of this year's fighting season, the Taliban have weathered the biggest push the American-led coalition is going to make against them," the report said.
# # #
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.
To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.
News & Opinion
Trending
Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit
Privacy Policy