Penn. Judge Indicates Voter ID Law May Be Blocked
A Pennsylvania judge has indicated the state's controversial voter ID law may be blocked.
Commonwealth Court Judge Robert E. Simpson Jr. told lawyers on Tuesday, "I think it's a possibility there could be an injunction here," after hearing testimony on whether some voters would be disenfranchised.
Earlier this month, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court on Tuesday ordered the lower court to revisit its decision in the controversial voter ID law, which voting rights advocates have said would have disenfranchised as many as 750,000.
That ruling stated:
The court is to consider whether the procedures being used for deployment of the cards comport with the requirement of liberal access which the General Assembly attached to the issuance of PennDOT identification cards. If they do not, or if the Commonwealth Court is not still convinced in its predictive judgment that there will be no voter disenfranchisement arising out of the Commonwealth's implementation of a voter identification requirement for purposes of the upcoming election, that court is obliged to enter a preliminary injunction. [emphasis ours]
Accordingly, the order of the Commonwealth Court is VACATED, and the matter is returned to the Commonwealth Court for further proceedings consistent with this Order. The Commonwealth Court is to file its supplemental opinion on or before October 2, 2012.
The Philadelphia Inquirer reports that both sides will be back in court on Thursday "to present arguments on what such an injunction should look like."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. The final deadline for our crucial Summer Campaign fundraising drive is just days away, and we’re falling short of our must-hit goal. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
A Pennsylvania judge has indicated the state's controversial voter ID law may be blocked.
Commonwealth Court Judge Robert E. Simpson Jr. told lawyers on Tuesday, "I think it's a possibility there could be an injunction here," after hearing testimony on whether some voters would be disenfranchised.
Earlier this month, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court on Tuesday ordered the lower court to revisit its decision in the controversial voter ID law, which voting rights advocates have said would have disenfranchised as many as 750,000.
That ruling stated:
The court is to consider whether the procedures being used for deployment of the cards comport with the requirement of liberal access which the General Assembly attached to the issuance of PennDOT identification cards. If they do not, or if the Commonwealth Court is not still convinced in its predictive judgment that there will be no voter disenfranchisement arising out of the Commonwealth's implementation of a voter identification requirement for purposes of the upcoming election, that court is obliged to enter a preliminary injunction. [emphasis ours]
Accordingly, the order of the Commonwealth Court is VACATED, and the matter is returned to the Commonwealth Court for further proceedings consistent with this Order. The Commonwealth Court is to file its supplemental opinion on or before October 2, 2012.
The Philadelphia Inquirer reports that both sides will be back in court on Thursday "to present arguments on what such an injunction should look like."
A Pennsylvania judge has indicated the state's controversial voter ID law may be blocked.
Commonwealth Court Judge Robert E. Simpson Jr. told lawyers on Tuesday, "I think it's a possibility there could be an injunction here," after hearing testimony on whether some voters would be disenfranchised.
Earlier this month, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court on Tuesday ordered the lower court to revisit its decision in the controversial voter ID law, which voting rights advocates have said would have disenfranchised as many as 750,000.
That ruling stated:
The court is to consider whether the procedures being used for deployment of the cards comport with the requirement of liberal access which the General Assembly attached to the issuance of PennDOT identification cards. If they do not, or if the Commonwealth Court is not still convinced in its predictive judgment that there will be no voter disenfranchisement arising out of the Commonwealth's implementation of a voter identification requirement for purposes of the upcoming election, that court is obliged to enter a preliminary injunction. [emphasis ours]
Accordingly, the order of the Commonwealth Court is VACATED, and the matter is returned to the Commonwealth Court for further proceedings consistent with this Order. The Commonwealth Court is to file its supplemental opinion on or before October 2, 2012.
The Philadelphia Inquirer reports that both sides will be back in court on Thursday "to present arguments on what such an injunction should look like."