SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Kansas High Court Sides with BP in Town Clean-up Dispute
Sep 01, 2012
The Kansas Supreme Court on Friday sided with oil giant BP against a citizen lawsuit that hoped to hold the company accountable for toxic pollution left behind from a refinery operation that closed more than three decades ago.
In one of the longest trials in state history, residents of Neodesha, Kansas had sued BP for "groundwater pollution under 350 acres of land - including almost 70 percent of the town and land underneath City Hall, hundreds of homes and the community's schools. The lawsuit contended the operation of the oil refinery and associated labs and storage facilities generated a variety of poisonous wastes and metals."
The jury in that original trial sided with BP, but the judge subsequently overturned that verdict. As the Associated Press explains: "In 2008, Allen County District Judge Daniel Creitz said that strict liability for the contamination was not a question of fact for the jury to decide but a question of law - and that Neodesha, located in rural southeastern Kansas, was entitled to judgment in its favor."
The Supreme Court's decision said Creitz was wrong to overturn the jury verdict, and thus reinstated its determination.
Rochelle Chronister, a Neodesha resident and former state legislator who attended most of the trial, wrote in an email to the Kansas City Star, "Looks like we lost big time!"
BP, however, was thrilled with the court's decision, saying "the proper verdict" had been reached.
###
Why Your Ongoing Support Is Essential
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The Kansas Supreme Court on Friday sided with oil giant BP against a citizen lawsuit that hoped to hold the company accountable for toxic pollution left behind from a refinery operation that closed more than three decades ago.
In one of the longest trials in state history, residents of Neodesha, Kansas had sued BP for "groundwater pollution under 350 acres of land - including almost 70 percent of the town and land underneath City Hall, hundreds of homes and the community's schools. The lawsuit contended the operation of the oil refinery and associated labs and storage facilities generated a variety of poisonous wastes and metals."
The jury in that original trial sided with BP, but the judge subsequently overturned that verdict. As the Associated Press explains: "In 2008, Allen County District Judge Daniel Creitz said that strict liability for the contamination was not a question of fact for the jury to decide but a question of law - and that Neodesha, located in rural southeastern Kansas, was entitled to judgment in its favor."
The Supreme Court's decision said Creitz was wrong to overturn the jury verdict, and thus reinstated its determination.
Rochelle Chronister, a Neodesha resident and former state legislator who attended most of the trial, wrote in an email to the Kansas City Star, "Looks like we lost big time!"
BP, however, was thrilled with the court's decision, saying "the proper verdict" had been reached.
###
The Kansas Supreme Court on Friday sided with oil giant BP against a citizen lawsuit that hoped to hold the company accountable for toxic pollution left behind from a refinery operation that closed more than three decades ago.
In one of the longest trials in state history, residents of Neodesha, Kansas had sued BP for "groundwater pollution under 350 acres of land - including almost 70 percent of the town and land underneath City Hall, hundreds of homes and the community's schools. The lawsuit contended the operation of the oil refinery and associated labs and storage facilities generated a variety of poisonous wastes and metals."
The jury in that original trial sided with BP, but the judge subsequently overturned that verdict. As the Associated Press explains: "In 2008, Allen County District Judge Daniel Creitz said that strict liability for the contamination was not a question of fact for the jury to decide but a question of law - and that Neodesha, located in rural southeastern Kansas, was entitled to judgment in its favor."
The Supreme Court's decision said Creitz was wrong to overturn the jury verdict, and thus reinstated its determination.
Rochelle Chronister, a Neodesha resident and former state legislator who attended most of the trial, wrote in an email to the Kansas City Star, "Looks like we lost big time!"
BP, however, was thrilled with the court's decision, saying "the proper verdict" had been reached.
###
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.