Bradley Manning Supporters Rally at Quantico Protesting Inhumane Conditions (Photo: Billy Perry)
Aug 11, 2012
US army whistleblower Private Bradley Manning, known for allegedly leaking embarrassing US cables to website WikiLeaks, is now claiming his treatment in a pre-trial military prison for nine months was extreme and harsh and warrants a complete dismissal of his case. Manning's defense also claims that his abusive treatment was directed from high up a chain of command.
On Friday, Manning's attorney David Coombs released a 110-page motion detailing the soldier's pretrial confinement conditions during the nine months in the Quantico, Va. military prison.
The motion claims that Manning was punished through "degradation and humiliation" including:
- Manning was forced for several days to surrender all his clothing at night and stand naked in his cell for roll call.
- For several days in January last year he was forbidden to wear his glasses and forced to strip down to his underwear during the day.
- He was forced to sleep beneath a stiff suicide-prevention blanket.
- Manning suffered an anxiety attack due to harassment by guards.
The motion lists many more abusive scenarios endured by Manning but also claims that the officer who ordered the restrictions was acting on orders from an unidentified three-star general. Coombs claims, the treatment was "retaliatory punishment" after Manning and his defense spoke out over previous treatment.
Manning's lawyers claim there was no legal or medical justification for the harsh treatment and that the treatment contradicted the recommendations of multiple psychiatrists.
Manning's defense will give evidence of his experience during a hearing on October 1-5, according to the document.
Coombs is attempting to get all charges dismissed on the grounds that Manning's pre-trial treatment was illegal and in violation of the constitutional prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment.
Why Your Ongoing Support Is Essential
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
US army whistleblower Private Bradley Manning, known for allegedly leaking embarrassing US cables to website WikiLeaks, is now claiming his treatment in a pre-trial military prison for nine months was extreme and harsh and warrants a complete dismissal of his case. Manning's defense also claims that his abusive treatment was directed from high up a chain of command.
On Friday, Manning's attorney David Coombs released a 110-page motion detailing the soldier's pretrial confinement conditions during the nine months in the Quantico, Va. military prison.
The motion claims that Manning was punished through "degradation and humiliation" including:
- Manning was forced for several days to surrender all his clothing at night and stand naked in his cell for roll call.
- For several days in January last year he was forbidden to wear his glasses and forced to strip down to his underwear during the day.
- He was forced to sleep beneath a stiff suicide-prevention blanket.
- Manning suffered an anxiety attack due to harassment by guards.
The motion lists many more abusive scenarios endured by Manning but also claims that the officer who ordered the restrictions was acting on orders from an unidentified three-star general. Coombs claims, the treatment was "retaliatory punishment" after Manning and his defense spoke out over previous treatment.
Manning's lawyers claim there was no legal or medical justification for the harsh treatment and that the treatment contradicted the recommendations of multiple psychiatrists.
Manning's defense will give evidence of his experience during a hearing on October 1-5, according to the document.
Coombs is attempting to get all charges dismissed on the grounds that Manning's pre-trial treatment was illegal and in violation of the constitutional prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment.
US army whistleblower Private Bradley Manning, known for allegedly leaking embarrassing US cables to website WikiLeaks, is now claiming his treatment in a pre-trial military prison for nine months was extreme and harsh and warrants a complete dismissal of his case. Manning's defense also claims that his abusive treatment was directed from high up a chain of command.
On Friday, Manning's attorney David Coombs released a 110-page motion detailing the soldier's pretrial confinement conditions during the nine months in the Quantico, Va. military prison.
The motion claims that Manning was punished through "degradation and humiliation" including:
- Manning was forced for several days to surrender all his clothing at night and stand naked in his cell for roll call.
- For several days in January last year he was forbidden to wear his glasses and forced to strip down to his underwear during the day.
- He was forced to sleep beneath a stiff suicide-prevention blanket.
- Manning suffered an anxiety attack due to harassment by guards.
The motion lists many more abusive scenarios endured by Manning but also claims that the officer who ordered the restrictions was acting on orders from an unidentified three-star general. Coombs claims, the treatment was "retaliatory punishment" after Manning and his defense spoke out over previous treatment.
Manning's lawyers claim there was no legal or medical justification for the harsh treatment and that the treatment contradicted the recommendations of multiple psychiatrists.
Manning's defense will give evidence of his experience during a hearing on October 1-5, according to the document.
Coombs is attempting to get all charges dismissed on the grounds that Manning's pre-trial treatment was illegal and in violation of the constitutional prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.