SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Bradley Manning Supporters Rally at Quantico Protesting Inhumane Conditions (Photo: Billy Perry)
US army whistleblower Private Bradley Manning, known for allegedly leaking embarrassing US cables to website WikiLeaks, is now claiming his treatment in a pre-trial military prison for nine months was extreme and harsh and warrants a complete dismissal of his case. Manning's defense also claims that his abusive treatment was directed from high up a chain of command.
On Friday, Manning's attorney David Coombs released a 110-page motion detailing the soldier's pretrial confinement conditions during the nine months in the Quantico, Va. military prison.
The motion claims that Manning was punished through "degradation and humiliation" including:
The motion lists many more abusive scenarios endured by Manning but also claims that the officer who ordered the restrictions was acting on orders from an unidentified three-star general. Coombs claims, the treatment was "retaliatory punishment" after Manning and his defense spoke out over previous treatment.
Manning's lawyers claim there was no legal or medical justification for the harsh treatment and that the treatment contradicted the recommendations of multiple psychiatrists.
Manning's defense will give evidence of his experience during a hearing on October 1-5, according to the document.
Coombs is attempting to get all charges dismissed on the grounds that Manning's pre-trial treatment was illegal and in violation of the constitutional prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment.
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
US army whistleblower Private Bradley Manning, known for allegedly leaking embarrassing US cables to website WikiLeaks, is now claiming his treatment in a pre-trial military prison for nine months was extreme and harsh and warrants a complete dismissal of his case. Manning's defense also claims that his abusive treatment was directed from high up a chain of command.
On Friday, Manning's attorney David Coombs released a 110-page motion detailing the soldier's pretrial confinement conditions during the nine months in the Quantico, Va. military prison.
The motion claims that Manning was punished through "degradation and humiliation" including:
The motion lists many more abusive scenarios endured by Manning but also claims that the officer who ordered the restrictions was acting on orders from an unidentified three-star general. Coombs claims, the treatment was "retaliatory punishment" after Manning and his defense spoke out over previous treatment.
Manning's lawyers claim there was no legal or medical justification for the harsh treatment and that the treatment contradicted the recommendations of multiple psychiatrists.
Manning's defense will give evidence of his experience during a hearing on October 1-5, according to the document.
Coombs is attempting to get all charges dismissed on the grounds that Manning's pre-trial treatment was illegal and in violation of the constitutional prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment.
US army whistleblower Private Bradley Manning, known for allegedly leaking embarrassing US cables to website WikiLeaks, is now claiming his treatment in a pre-trial military prison for nine months was extreme and harsh and warrants a complete dismissal of his case. Manning's defense also claims that his abusive treatment was directed from high up a chain of command.
On Friday, Manning's attorney David Coombs released a 110-page motion detailing the soldier's pretrial confinement conditions during the nine months in the Quantico, Va. military prison.
The motion claims that Manning was punished through "degradation and humiliation" including:
The motion lists many more abusive scenarios endured by Manning but also claims that the officer who ordered the restrictions was acting on orders from an unidentified three-star general. Coombs claims, the treatment was "retaliatory punishment" after Manning and his defense spoke out over previous treatment.
Manning's lawyers claim there was no legal or medical justification for the harsh treatment and that the treatment contradicted the recommendations of multiple psychiatrists.
Manning's defense will give evidence of his experience during a hearing on October 1-5, according to the document.
Coombs is attempting to get all charges dismissed on the grounds that Manning's pre-trial treatment was illegal and in violation of the constitutional prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment.