

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
The U.K. is facing a legal challenge over its possible role in providing information used in the U.S. "kill list" in Afghanistan.
The challenge to Britain's Serious Organized Crime Agency (SOCA) and the Ministry of Defense is brought by Habib Rahman, who lost five family members -- two brothers, two uncles and his father-in-law -- in a missile attack in September 2010, which International Security Assistance Force says was a "precision air strike" that killed "insurgents" but investigation by Afghanistan Analysts Network shows was a case of mistaken identity.
Rosa Curling of Leigh Day & Co, a British firm representing Rahman, said, "Our client's case suggests that the establishment and maintenance of the 'killing list' is not in line with the UK's duties under international humanitarian law.
"It is important that the MoD and SOCA provide us with the reassurances sought, to make sure that others do not suffer the tragic loss of life as experienced by Mr Rahman."
The Guardian adds that "who is put on the 'kill list' and why remains a closely guarded secret - and has become a huge concern for human rights groups. They have questioned the legality of such operations and said civilians are often killed."
A 2009 report to the US Senate's committee on foreign relations stated, "The military places no restrictions on the use of force with these selected targets, which means they can be killed or captured on the battlefield."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The U.K. is facing a legal challenge over its possible role in providing information used in the U.S. "kill list" in Afghanistan.
The challenge to Britain's Serious Organized Crime Agency (SOCA) and the Ministry of Defense is brought by Habib Rahman, who lost five family members -- two brothers, two uncles and his father-in-law -- in a missile attack in September 2010, which International Security Assistance Force says was a "precision air strike" that killed "insurgents" but investigation by Afghanistan Analysts Network shows was a case of mistaken identity.
Rosa Curling of Leigh Day & Co, a British firm representing Rahman, said, "Our client's case suggests that the establishment and maintenance of the 'killing list' is not in line with the UK's duties under international humanitarian law.
"It is important that the MoD and SOCA provide us with the reassurances sought, to make sure that others do not suffer the tragic loss of life as experienced by Mr Rahman."
The Guardian adds that "who is put on the 'kill list' and why remains a closely guarded secret - and has become a huge concern for human rights groups. They have questioned the legality of such operations and said civilians are often killed."
A 2009 report to the US Senate's committee on foreign relations stated, "The military places no restrictions on the use of force with these selected targets, which means they can be killed or captured on the battlefield."
The U.K. is facing a legal challenge over its possible role in providing information used in the U.S. "kill list" in Afghanistan.
The challenge to Britain's Serious Organized Crime Agency (SOCA) and the Ministry of Defense is brought by Habib Rahman, who lost five family members -- two brothers, two uncles and his father-in-law -- in a missile attack in September 2010, which International Security Assistance Force says was a "precision air strike" that killed "insurgents" but investigation by Afghanistan Analysts Network shows was a case of mistaken identity.
Rosa Curling of Leigh Day & Co, a British firm representing Rahman, said, "Our client's case suggests that the establishment and maintenance of the 'killing list' is not in line with the UK's duties under international humanitarian law.
"It is important that the MoD and SOCA provide us with the reassurances sought, to make sure that others do not suffer the tragic loss of life as experienced by Mr Rahman."
The Guardian adds that "who is put on the 'kill list' and why remains a closely guarded secret - and has become a huge concern for human rights groups. They have questioned the legality of such operations and said civilians are often killed."
A 2009 report to the US Senate's committee on foreign relations stated, "The military places no restrictions on the use of force with these selected targets, which means they can be killed or captured on the battlefield."