SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
As Romney and Obama both seek praise for their commitment to Israel, diplomatic and peaceful solutions to the Iranian nuclear issue slip further towards the margins.
While meeting with Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak on Wednesday, US Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta repeated several times that "all options," including military force, remain on the table when it comes to confronting Iran over its nuclear enrichment program.
During a tour of an "Iron Dome" missile system in Ashkelon with Barak, Panetta said that the Obama administration would continue to pursue a regime of economic sanctions against Iran, and said that the country "must accept limits" on its nuclear program or risk military action.
On Tuesday, the Obama administration proposed new sanctions on Iran. The announced sanctions will target Iran's energy sector and aim to thwart its ability to access international financial markets.
The announcement follows directly on GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney's recent trip to Israel and amid Republican criticism that the president is not "tough enough" when it comes to dealing with Iran.
The Romney campaign clarified their candidate's position following comments made by surrogates that some thought betrayed standing US policy, saying: "Gov. Romney believes we should employ any and all measures to dissuade the Iranian regime from its nuclear course, and it is his fervent hope that diplomatic and economic measures will do so. In the final analysis, of course, no option should be excluded. Gov. Romney recognizes Israel's right to defend itself, and that it is right for America to stand with it."
Commenting at CNN, Blake Hounshell, managing editor of Foreign Policy, writes, "If that sounds an awful lot like Barack Obama's position, it's because it is Obama's position."
"Romney likes to sound tougher on Iran, but when you really delve into the specifics, there's not a lot of difference there from what the administration has done or is already doing," said Colin H. Kahl, a former Pentagon official who is an adviser to the Obama campaign, to the New York Times. "A lot of this is Romney describing our current policy and masquerading it as criticism of the president."
Barak, speaking on behalf of the Israeli government and standing next to Panetta, said he sees an "extremely low" probability that even newly proposed US sanctions will compel Iran to give up its nuclear activities. Ultimately, Barak said, Israel reserved the right to take action into its own hands and stressed that the Israeli government alone would decide its security issues.
Panetta said the US respects Israel's right to defend itself. "The U.S. respects Israel's sovereignty and independence and their efforts to decide what's in their best interest in the region," he said.
Following a meeting with Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Panetta released a statement, which read: "We will not allow Iran to develop a nuclear weapon. Period." And added: "We will exert all options in the effort to ensure that that does not happen."
Iran has consistently denied it is operating a nuclear weapons program, though it affirms its right, as a signatory to the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), to enrich uranium for energy production, research and medical purposes. Despite repeated public proclamations, neither the US, Israel, or the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) have presented significant evidence to contradict those claims.
Israel has not signed the NPT and refuses to acknowledge its own nuclear arsenal, widely believed to contain approximately 200 nuclear warheads.
# # #
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
While meeting with Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak on Wednesday, US Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta repeated several times that "all options," including military force, remain on the table when it comes to confronting Iran over its nuclear enrichment program.
During a tour of an "Iron Dome" missile system in Ashkelon with Barak, Panetta said that the Obama administration would continue to pursue a regime of economic sanctions against Iran, and said that the country "must accept limits" on its nuclear program or risk military action.
On Tuesday, the Obama administration proposed new sanctions on Iran. The announced sanctions will target Iran's energy sector and aim to thwart its ability to access international financial markets.
The announcement follows directly on GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney's recent trip to Israel and amid Republican criticism that the president is not "tough enough" when it comes to dealing with Iran.
The Romney campaign clarified their candidate's position following comments made by surrogates that some thought betrayed standing US policy, saying: "Gov. Romney believes we should employ any and all measures to dissuade the Iranian regime from its nuclear course, and it is his fervent hope that diplomatic and economic measures will do so. In the final analysis, of course, no option should be excluded. Gov. Romney recognizes Israel's right to defend itself, and that it is right for America to stand with it."
Commenting at CNN, Blake Hounshell, managing editor of Foreign Policy, writes, "If that sounds an awful lot like Barack Obama's position, it's because it is Obama's position."
"Romney likes to sound tougher on Iran, but when you really delve into the specifics, there's not a lot of difference there from what the administration has done or is already doing," said Colin H. Kahl, a former Pentagon official who is an adviser to the Obama campaign, to the New York Times. "A lot of this is Romney describing our current policy and masquerading it as criticism of the president."
Barak, speaking on behalf of the Israeli government and standing next to Panetta, said he sees an "extremely low" probability that even newly proposed US sanctions will compel Iran to give up its nuclear activities. Ultimately, Barak said, Israel reserved the right to take action into its own hands and stressed that the Israeli government alone would decide its security issues.
Panetta said the US respects Israel's right to defend itself. "The U.S. respects Israel's sovereignty and independence and their efforts to decide what's in their best interest in the region," he said.
Following a meeting with Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Panetta released a statement, which read: "We will not allow Iran to develop a nuclear weapon. Period." And added: "We will exert all options in the effort to ensure that that does not happen."
Iran has consistently denied it is operating a nuclear weapons program, though it affirms its right, as a signatory to the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), to enrich uranium for energy production, research and medical purposes. Despite repeated public proclamations, neither the US, Israel, or the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) have presented significant evidence to contradict those claims.
Israel has not signed the NPT and refuses to acknowledge its own nuclear arsenal, widely believed to contain approximately 200 nuclear warheads.
# # #
While meeting with Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak on Wednesday, US Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta repeated several times that "all options," including military force, remain on the table when it comes to confronting Iran over its nuclear enrichment program.
During a tour of an "Iron Dome" missile system in Ashkelon with Barak, Panetta said that the Obama administration would continue to pursue a regime of economic sanctions against Iran, and said that the country "must accept limits" on its nuclear program or risk military action.
On Tuesday, the Obama administration proposed new sanctions on Iran. The announced sanctions will target Iran's energy sector and aim to thwart its ability to access international financial markets.
The announcement follows directly on GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney's recent trip to Israel and amid Republican criticism that the president is not "tough enough" when it comes to dealing with Iran.
The Romney campaign clarified their candidate's position following comments made by surrogates that some thought betrayed standing US policy, saying: "Gov. Romney believes we should employ any and all measures to dissuade the Iranian regime from its nuclear course, and it is his fervent hope that diplomatic and economic measures will do so. In the final analysis, of course, no option should be excluded. Gov. Romney recognizes Israel's right to defend itself, and that it is right for America to stand with it."
Commenting at CNN, Blake Hounshell, managing editor of Foreign Policy, writes, "If that sounds an awful lot like Barack Obama's position, it's because it is Obama's position."
"Romney likes to sound tougher on Iran, but when you really delve into the specifics, there's not a lot of difference there from what the administration has done or is already doing," said Colin H. Kahl, a former Pentagon official who is an adviser to the Obama campaign, to the New York Times. "A lot of this is Romney describing our current policy and masquerading it as criticism of the president."
Barak, speaking on behalf of the Israeli government and standing next to Panetta, said he sees an "extremely low" probability that even newly proposed US sanctions will compel Iran to give up its nuclear activities. Ultimately, Barak said, Israel reserved the right to take action into its own hands and stressed that the Israeli government alone would decide its security issues.
Panetta said the US respects Israel's right to defend itself. "The U.S. respects Israel's sovereignty and independence and their efforts to decide what's in their best interest in the region," he said.
Following a meeting with Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Panetta released a statement, which read: "We will not allow Iran to develop a nuclear weapon. Period." And added: "We will exert all options in the effort to ensure that that does not happen."
Iran has consistently denied it is operating a nuclear weapons program, though it affirms its right, as a signatory to the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), to enrich uranium for energy production, research and medical purposes. Despite repeated public proclamations, neither the US, Israel, or the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) have presented significant evidence to contradict those claims.
Israel has not signed the NPT and refuses to acknowledge its own nuclear arsenal, widely believed to contain approximately 200 nuclear warheads.
# # #