Jul 20, 2012
Mirroring the sub-prime mortgage scandal, lending institutions used shady practices in a quest for profits in issuing private student loans that left hundreds of thousands of students with debt they cannot escape, according to a report released Friday from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and the US Department of Education.
"Subprime-style lending went to college, and now students are paying the price," said Education Secretary Arne Duncan.
Comparing the subprime lending and private student loans, Jeff Gelles of the Philadelphia Inquirer explains: "As the housing bubble ballooned, it was fueled in part by lenders' ability to make loans and then quickly resell them to so-called securitizers -- Wall Street firms that packaged them as bonds -- without retaining any of the risk. The report says the same thing happened in the market for private student loans."
The report found that between 2005 and 2007, lenders targeted students directly, without educational institutional involvement, whereby students did not learn about other, less risky Federal loans. These kinds of loans also let students take out more than their educational need.
Lenders also targeted students at for-profit institutions. "In 2008, 42% of undergraduates at for-profit colleges took out a private student loan, while only 14% of all undergraduates used a private student loan," the report states.
The borrowers were often unaware of the all the terms of their loans. "The first time they ever really understood how much they owed was when the first bill arrived," Duncan said. Unable to repay, there is now $8.1 billion in defaulted private loans.
Students with the tremendous private student loan debt are unable to break free from its chains by declaring bankruptcy, which Sen. Dick Durbin (IL) would like to see changed.
"There is no reason why private student loans should get treated differently from other private debt in bankruptcy," Durbin said at a Senate subcommittee hearing in March. "And it is especially egregious that these private loans are non-dischargeable in cases where a student was steered into the loan while the student was eligible for safer federal loans."
"Borrowers who took out loans at the height of the boom are still suffering from those excesses," CFPB Director Richard Cordray said.
Why Your Ongoing Support Is Essential
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Mirroring the sub-prime mortgage scandal, lending institutions used shady practices in a quest for profits in issuing private student loans that left hundreds of thousands of students with debt they cannot escape, according to a report released Friday from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and the US Department of Education.
"Subprime-style lending went to college, and now students are paying the price," said Education Secretary Arne Duncan.
Comparing the subprime lending and private student loans, Jeff Gelles of the Philadelphia Inquirer explains: "As the housing bubble ballooned, it was fueled in part by lenders' ability to make loans and then quickly resell them to so-called securitizers -- Wall Street firms that packaged them as bonds -- without retaining any of the risk. The report says the same thing happened in the market for private student loans."
The report found that between 2005 and 2007, lenders targeted students directly, without educational institutional involvement, whereby students did not learn about other, less risky Federal loans. These kinds of loans also let students take out more than their educational need.
Lenders also targeted students at for-profit institutions. "In 2008, 42% of undergraduates at for-profit colleges took out a private student loan, while only 14% of all undergraduates used a private student loan," the report states.
The borrowers were often unaware of the all the terms of their loans. "The first time they ever really understood how much they owed was when the first bill arrived," Duncan said. Unable to repay, there is now $8.1 billion in defaulted private loans.
Students with the tremendous private student loan debt are unable to break free from its chains by declaring bankruptcy, which Sen. Dick Durbin (IL) would like to see changed.
"There is no reason why private student loans should get treated differently from other private debt in bankruptcy," Durbin said at a Senate subcommittee hearing in March. "And it is especially egregious that these private loans are non-dischargeable in cases where a student was steered into the loan while the student was eligible for safer federal loans."
"Borrowers who took out loans at the height of the boom are still suffering from those excesses," CFPB Director Richard Cordray said.
Mirroring the sub-prime mortgage scandal, lending institutions used shady practices in a quest for profits in issuing private student loans that left hundreds of thousands of students with debt they cannot escape, according to a report released Friday from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and the US Department of Education.
"Subprime-style lending went to college, and now students are paying the price," said Education Secretary Arne Duncan.
Comparing the subprime lending and private student loans, Jeff Gelles of the Philadelphia Inquirer explains: "As the housing bubble ballooned, it was fueled in part by lenders' ability to make loans and then quickly resell them to so-called securitizers -- Wall Street firms that packaged them as bonds -- without retaining any of the risk. The report says the same thing happened in the market for private student loans."
The report found that between 2005 and 2007, lenders targeted students directly, without educational institutional involvement, whereby students did not learn about other, less risky Federal loans. These kinds of loans also let students take out more than their educational need.
Lenders also targeted students at for-profit institutions. "In 2008, 42% of undergraduates at for-profit colleges took out a private student loan, while only 14% of all undergraduates used a private student loan," the report states.
The borrowers were often unaware of the all the terms of their loans. "The first time they ever really understood how much they owed was when the first bill arrived," Duncan said. Unable to repay, there is now $8.1 billion in defaulted private loans.
Students with the tremendous private student loan debt are unable to break free from its chains by declaring bankruptcy, which Sen. Dick Durbin (IL) would like to see changed.
"There is no reason why private student loans should get treated differently from other private debt in bankruptcy," Durbin said at a Senate subcommittee hearing in March. "And it is especially egregious that these private loans are non-dischargeable in cases where a student was steered into the loan while the student was eligible for safer federal loans."
"Borrowers who took out loans at the height of the boom are still suffering from those excesses," CFPB Director Richard Cordray said.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.