SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Surging Surveillance: Shocking Number of Cell Users' Data Tracked
Jul 09, 2012
Cell phone surveillance has surged dramatically with over 1.3 million requests made last year by law enforcement agencies to cell phone companies for users' data, according to the results of a Congressional investigation released Monday.
The information comes in response to a request from Representative Edward Markey, co-chair of the Bipartisan Congressional Privacy Caucus, to nine cell phone carriers after reading a New York Times article from April on the spike in cell phone tracking with little oversight.
The results of the findings shocked Markey. "I never expected it to be this massive," he said. While the 1.3 million requests is staggering, the Times reports Monday that the total number of people affected "could be several times higher than the number of requests" since one request may involve many individuals.
The Times reports that "AT&T alone now responds to an average of more than 700 requests a day," three times the number of requests from 2007 while Sprint had the biggest number averaging 1500 requests a day.
"We cannot allow privacy protections to be swept aside with the sweeping nature of these information requests, especially for innocent consumers," warned Markey. "Law enforcement agencies are looking for a needle, but what are they doing with the haystack?"
The Hill reports the law enforcement requests would demand information including "text messages, location data, call logs and 'cell tower dumps,' in which the wireless carriers provide police with all of the phone numbers that connected to a particular cell tower in a period of time."
Trevor Timm of Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) writes that this "is a recipe for a privacy disaster" and says the EFF believes "the Fourth Amendment protects cell location information."
The ACLU notes that the lack of privacy safeguards for customers leaves people wide open to this type of surveillance. "Whether they realize it or not, Americans are carrying tracking devices with them wherever they go. Today's new information makes it clear that law enforcement has carte blanche to follow the trail they leave behind," said Christopher Calabrese, ACLU legislative counsel. "The cell phone data of innocent Americans is almost certainly swept up in these requests. Without clear safeguards and standards for how law enforcement gathers and stores location information, there is a massive privacy gap that leaves all of us vulnerable."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Cell phone surveillance has surged dramatically with over 1.3 million requests made last year by law enforcement agencies to cell phone companies for users' data, according to the results of a Congressional investigation released Monday.
The information comes in response to a request from Representative Edward Markey, co-chair of the Bipartisan Congressional Privacy Caucus, to nine cell phone carriers after reading a New York Times article from April on the spike in cell phone tracking with little oversight.
The results of the findings shocked Markey. "I never expected it to be this massive," he said. While the 1.3 million requests is staggering, the Times reports Monday that the total number of people affected "could be several times higher than the number of requests" since one request may involve many individuals.
The Times reports that "AT&T alone now responds to an average of more than 700 requests a day," three times the number of requests from 2007 while Sprint had the biggest number averaging 1500 requests a day.
"We cannot allow privacy protections to be swept aside with the sweeping nature of these information requests, especially for innocent consumers," warned Markey. "Law enforcement agencies are looking for a needle, but what are they doing with the haystack?"
The Hill reports the law enforcement requests would demand information including "text messages, location data, call logs and 'cell tower dumps,' in which the wireless carriers provide police with all of the phone numbers that connected to a particular cell tower in a period of time."
Trevor Timm of Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) writes that this "is a recipe for a privacy disaster" and says the EFF believes "the Fourth Amendment protects cell location information."
The ACLU notes that the lack of privacy safeguards for customers leaves people wide open to this type of surveillance. "Whether they realize it or not, Americans are carrying tracking devices with them wherever they go. Today's new information makes it clear that law enforcement has carte blanche to follow the trail they leave behind," said Christopher Calabrese, ACLU legislative counsel. "The cell phone data of innocent Americans is almost certainly swept up in these requests. Without clear safeguards and standards for how law enforcement gathers and stores location information, there is a massive privacy gap that leaves all of us vulnerable."
Cell phone surveillance has surged dramatically with over 1.3 million requests made last year by law enforcement agencies to cell phone companies for users' data, according to the results of a Congressional investigation released Monday.
The information comes in response to a request from Representative Edward Markey, co-chair of the Bipartisan Congressional Privacy Caucus, to nine cell phone carriers after reading a New York Times article from April on the spike in cell phone tracking with little oversight.
The results of the findings shocked Markey. "I never expected it to be this massive," he said. While the 1.3 million requests is staggering, the Times reports Monday that the total number of people affected "could be several times higher than the number of requests" since one request may involve many individuals.
The Times reports that "AT&T alone now responds to an average of more than 700 requests a day," three times the number of requests from 2007 while Sprint had the biggest number averaging 1500 requests a day.
"We cannot allow privacy protections to be swept aside with the sweeping nature of these information requests, especially for innocent consumers," warned Markey. "Law enforcement agencies are looking for a needle, but what are they doing with the haystack?"
The Hill reports the law enforcement requests would demand information including "text messages, location data, call logs and 'cell tower dumps,' in which the wireless carriers provide police with all of the phone numbers that connected to a particular cell tower in a period of time."
Trevor Timm of Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) writes that this "is a recipe for a privacy disaster" and says the EFF believes "the Fourth Amendment protects cell location information."
The ACLU notes that the lack of privacy safeguards for customers leaves people wide open to this type of surveillance. "Whether they realize it or not, Americans are carrying tracking devices with them wherever they go. Today's new information makes it clear that law enforcement has carte blanche to follow the trail they leave behind," said Christopher Calabrese, ACLU legislative counsel. "The cell phone data of innocent Americans is almost certainly swept up in these requests. Without clear safeguards and standards for how law enforcement gathers and stores location information, there is a massive privacy gap that leaves all of us vulnerable."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.
To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.
News & Opinion
Trending
Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit
Privacy Policy