SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Corporate America's Tax Scheme: 'Lobby More, Pay Less'
Top eight companies that spent the most on federal lobbying saw greatest drop in tax rates
Apr 17, 2012
A recent report released by the Sunlight Foundation found that of the 200 wealthiest U.S. companies, those who spent the most on lobbying in Washington saw the greatest reduction in reported tax rates between 2007 and 2010.
The top eight biggest spenders of the group between 2007 and 2009 saw the most unanimous tax benefits between 2007 and 2010, showing how money buys extreme tax leniency, with financial gains well into the billions.
"If you think you wound up paying too much in taxes this year, maybe you ought to hire a lobbyist. Or two. Or 20. After all, it's a strategy that seems to be working well for some of the nation's biggest corporations," the foundation states.
* * *
Sunlight Foundation: Lobby more, pay less in taxes
Combined, the Big Eight spent $540 million on lobbying between 2007 and 2009. In total, they filed 332 lobbying reports that mentioned taxes, naming 491 different tax bills over the three-year period we investigated. [...]
Compared to what their taxes would have been if their 2007 tax rates were applied to their 2010 income, we estimate that these eight companies saved a combined $11.2 billion on $120 billion in reported 2010 profits. If we assume that the entire reduction was due to their lobbying, the return on investment would be 2,069%. Of course, this is probably not the case. Without a detailed analysis of these companies' taxes, it would be impossible to tell why their rates fell. But we can observe that it is very unlikely that the eight companies that lobbied the most between 2007 and 2009 all would have seen such significant drops in their tax rates by random chance alone. [...]
Taking the 200 companies as a whole, we estimate that for each additional $1 million that companies spent lobbying between 2007 and 2009, their 2010 tax rate fell by 7/100ths of a percent. While that might not sound like much, for a $2.5 billion company at the median in our sample of large companies, each $1 million spent on lobbying translates into an estimated annual tax savings of $1.8 million - almost double the original investment, with benefits likely to continue in the future. [...]
When it comes to paying less in taxes, having an army of lobbyists appears to be helpful. Many companies lobby on taxes, but those who spend the most report the largest and most consistent declines in tax rates.
Table 1. Changes in reported tax rates:
| Company | 2007-2010 decline | 2007 rate | 2010 rate | 2007- 2009 lobbying (in millions) | Estimated tax reduction (in millions) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exxon Mobil | -1.1% | 41.8% | 40.7% | $81.92 | -$565.32 |
| Verizon Communications | -7.9% | 27.4% | 19.4% | $77.58 | -$1,005.51 |
| General Electric | -7.6% | 15.0% | 7.4% | $73.17 | -$1,082.70 |
| At&T | -40.4% | 34.0% | -6.4% | $70.96 | -$7,359.95 |
| Altria | -1.6% | 28.9% | 27.4% | $63.31 | -$160.66 |
| Amgen | -7.1% | 20.1% | 13.0% | $58.33 | -$377.16 |
| Northrop Grumman | -11.4% | 32.9% | 21.5% | $57.56 | -$296.08 |
| Boeing | -7.1% | 33.7% | 26.5% | $56.99 | -$321.5 |
| Median among 200 companies | -0.6% | 31.8% | 31.6% | $5.48 | -$13.08 |
* * *
Huffington Post: Corporations That Spent The Most On Lobbying Saw Tax Rates Decline: Report
The report notes that these top eight firms spent $540 million on lobbying from 2007 to 2009. They filed 332 lobbying reports that mentioned taxes and named 491 different tax bills in those reports.
The top eight companies that spent the most on lobbying were Exxon Mobil, Verizon Communications, General Electric, AT&T, Altria, Amgen, Northrop Grumman and Boeing. Exxon Mobil spent the most, some $81.92 million from 2007 to 2009.
AT&T recorded the largest tax reduction, with its tax rate falling from 34.0 percent to negative 6.4 percent from 2007 to 2010, or an estimated reduction of more than $7.3 billion. Altria, the parent company of Philip Morris, had the smallest decline from 2007 to 2010, with its rate declining from 28.9 percent to 27.4 percent. Six of the top eight companies saw declines of at least 7 percentage points.
The report comes as both President Barack Obama and Republican Party's presumptive nominee, Mitt Romney, have proposed lowering corporate tax rates. Obama has proposed lowering the corporate tax rate from 35 percent to 28 percent but eliminating loopholes and deductions. American manufacturers would get a bigger tax cut, having an effective rate of no more than 25 percent.
Romney has proposed cutting the corporate tax rate to 25 percent and repealing the corporate alternative minimum tax.
# # #
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
A recent report released by the Sunlight Foundation found that of the 200 wealthiest U.S. companies, those who spent the most on lobbying in Washington saw the greatest reduction in reported tax rates between 2007 and 2010.
The top eight biggest spenders of the group between 2007 and 2009 saw the most unanimous tax benefits between 2007 and 2010, showing how money buys extreme tax leniency, with financial gains well into the billions.
"If you think you wound up paying too much in taxes this year, maybe you ought to hire a lobbyist. Or two. Or 20. After all, it's a strategy that seems to be working well for some of the nation's biggest corporations," the foundation states.
* * *
Sunlight Foundation: Lobby more, pay less in taxes
Combined, the Big Eight spent $540 million on lobbying between 2007 and 2009. In total, they filed 332 lobbying reports that mentioned taxes, naming 491 different tax bills over the three-year period we investigated. [...]
Compared to what their taxes would have been if their 2007 tax rates were applied to their 2010 income, we estimate that these eight companies saved a combined $11.2 billion on $120 billion in reported 2010 profits. If we assume that the entire reduction was due to their lobbying, the return on investment would be 2,069%. Of course, this is probably not the case. Without a detailed analysis of these companies' taxes, it would be impossible to tell why their rates fell. But we can observe that it is very unlikely that the eight companies that lobbied the most between 2007 and 2009 all would have seen such significant drops in their tax rates by random chance alone. [...]
Taking the 200 companies as a whole, we estimate that for each additional $1 million that companies spent lobbying between 2007 and 2009, their 2010 tax rate fell by 7/100ths of a percent. While that might not sound like much, for a $2.5 billion company at the median in our sample of large companies, each $1 million spent on lobbying translates into an estimated annual tax savings of $1.8 million - almost double the original investment, with benefits likely to continue in the future. [...]
When it comes to paying less in taxes, having an army of lobbyists appears to be helpful. Many companies lobby on taxes, but those who spend the most report the largest and most consistent declines in tax rates.
Table 1. Changes in reported tax rates:
| Company | 2007-2010 decline | 2007 rate | 2010 rate | 2007- 2009 lobbying (in millions) | Estimated tax reduction (in millions) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exxon Mobil | -1.1% | 41.8% | 40.7% | $81.92 | -$565.32 |
| Verizon Communications | -7.9% | 27.4% | 19.4% | $77.58 | -$1,005.51 |
| General Electric | -7.6% | 15.0% | 7.4% | $73.17 | -$1,082.70 |
| At&T | -40.4% | 34.0% | -6.4% | $70.96 | -$7,359.95 |
| Altria | -1.6% | 28.9% | 27.4% | $63.31 | -$160.66 |
| Amgen | -7.1% | 20.1% | 13.0% | $58.33 | -$377.16 |
| Northrop Grumman | -11.4% | 32.9% | 21.5% | $57.56 | -$296.08 |
| Boeing | -7.1% | 33.7% | 26.5% | $56.99 | -$321.5 |
| Median among 200 companies | -0.6% | 31.8% | 31.6% | $5.48 | -$13.08 |
* * *
Huffington Post: Corporations That Spent The Most On Lobbying Saw Tax Rates Decline: Report
The report notes that these top eight firms spent $540 million on lobbying from 2007 to 2009. They filed 332 lobbying reports that mentioned taxes and named 491 different tax bills in those reports.
The top eight companies that spent the most on lobbying were Exxon Mobil, Verizon Communications, General Electric, AT&T, Altria, Amgen, Northrop Grumman and Boeing. Exxon Mobil spent the most, some $81.92 million from 2007 to 2009.
AT&T recorded the largest tax reduction, with its tax rate falling from 34.0 percent to negative 6.4 percent from 2007 to 2010, or an estimated reduction of more than $7.3 billion. Altria, the parent company of Philip Morris, had the smallest decline from 2007 to 2010, with its rate declining from 28.9 percent to 27.4 percent. Six of the top eight companies saw declines of at least 7 percentage points.
The report comes as both President Barack Obama and Republican Party's presumptive nominee, Mitt Romney, have proposed lowering corporate tax rates. Obama has proposed lowering the corporate tax rate from 35 percent to 28 percent but eliminating loopholes and deductions. American manufacturers would get a bigger tax cut, having an effective rate of no more than 25 percent.
Romney has proposed cutting the corporate tax rate to 25 percent and repealing the corporate alternative minimum tax.
# # #
A recent report released by the Sunlight Foundation found that of the 200 wealthiest U.S. companies, those who spent the most on lobbying in Washington saw the greatest reduction in reported tax rates between 2007 and 2010.
The top eight biggest spenders of the group between 2007 and 2009 saw the most unanimous tax benefits between 2007 and 2010, showing how money buys extreme tax leniency, with financial gains well into the billions.
"If you think you wound up paying too much in taxes this year, maybe you ought to hire a lobbyist. Or two. Or 20. After all, it's a strategy that seems to be working well for some of the nation's biggest corporations," the foundation states.
* * *
Sunlight Foundation: Lobby more, pay less in taxes
Combined, the Big Eight spent $540 million on lobbying between 2007 and 2009. In total, they filed 332 lobbying reports that mentioned taxes, naming 491 different tax bills over the three-year period we investigated. [...]
Compared to what their taxes would have been if their 2007 tax rates were applied to their 2010 income, we estimate that these eight companies saved a combined $11.2 billion on $120 billion in reported 2010 profits. If we assume that the entire reduction was due to their lobbying, the return on investment would be 2,069%. Of course, this is probably not the case. Without a detailed analysis of these companies' taxes, it would be impossible to tell why their rates fell. But we can observe that it is very unlikely that the eight companies that lobbied the most between 2007 and 2009 all would have seen such significant drops in their tax rates by random chance alone. [...]
Taking the 200 companies as a whole, we estimate that for each additional $1 million that companies spent lobbying between 2007 and 2009, their 2010 tax rate fell by 7/100ths of a percent. While that might not sound like much, for a $2.5 billion company at the median in our sample of large companies, each $1 million spent on lobbying translates into an estimated annual tax savings of $1.8 million - almost double the original investment, with benefits likely to continue in the future. [...]
When it comes to paying less in taxes, having an army of lobbyists appears to be helpful. Many companies lobby on taxes, but those who spend the most report the largest and most consistent declines in tax rates.
Table 1. Changes in reported tax rates:
| Company | 2007-2010 decline | 2007 rate | 2010 rate | 2007- 2009 lobbying (in millions) | Estimated tax reduction (in millions) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exxon Mobil | -1.1% | 41.8% | 40.7% | $81.92 | -$565.32 |
| Verizon Communications | -7.9% | 27.4% | 19.4% | $77.58 | -$1,005.51 |
| General Electric | -7.6% | 15.0% | 7.4% | $73.17 | -$1,082.70 |
| At&T | -40.4% | 34.0% | -6.4% | $70.96 | -$7,359.95 |
| Altria | -1.6% | 28.9% | 27.4% | $63.31 | -$160.66 |
| Amgen | -7.1% | 20.1% | 13.0% | $58.33 | -$377.16 |
| Northrop Grumman | -11.4% | 32.9% | 21.5% | $57.56 | -$296.08 |
| Boeing | -7.1% | 33.7% | 26.5% | $56.99 | -$321.5 |
| Median among 200 companies | -0.6% | 31.8% | 31.6% | $5.48 | -$13.08 |
* * *
Huffington Post: Corporations That Spent The Most On Lobbying Saw Tax Rates Decline: Report
The report notes that these top eight firms spent $540 million on lobbying from 2007 to 2009. They filed 332 lobbying reports that mentioned taxes and named 491 different tax bills in those reports.
The top eight companies that spent the most on lobbying were Exxon Mobil, Verizon Communications, General Electric, AT&T, Altria, Amgen, Northrop Grumman and Boeing. Exxon Mobil spent the most, some $81.92 million from 2007 to 2009.
AT&T recorded the largest tax reduction, with its tax rate falling from 34.0 percent to negative 6.4 percent from 2007 to 2010, or an estimated reduction of more than $7.3 billion. Altria, the parent company of Philip Morris, had the smallest decline from 2007 to 2010, with its rate declining from 28.9 percent to 27.4 percent. Six of the top eight companies saw declines of at least 7 percentage points.
The report comes as both President Barack Obama and Republican Party's presumptive nominee, Mitt Romney, have proposed lowering corporate tax rates. Obama has proposed lowering the corporate tax rate from 35 percent to 28 percent but eliminating loopholes and deductions. American manufacturers would get a bigger tax cut, having an effective rate of no more than 25 percent.
Romney has proposed cutting the corporate tax rate to 25 percent and repealing the corporate alternative minimum tax.
# # #
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.