SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Protester Pushback: Mayor 1% Emanuel Concedes Part of 'Sit Down and Shut Up' Plan
Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel cancels plan to increase protester fines
Jan 18, 2012
In December Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel introduced anti-protester legislation for the upcoming NATO and G-8 summits in Chicago. Part of his plan was to to increase the minimum fine from $25 to $200 and double the maximum fine to $1,000.
His plan, dubbed the 'Sit Down and Shut Up' ordinance, was slammed by many as an attack on free speech. On Tuesday, however, protesters received a partial victory when Mayor Emanuel agreed to drop the fine increase plan.
The Mayor apparently felt the heat of opposition, reports the Chicago Tribune:
The mayor had proposed doubling the maximum fine for resisting arrest to $1,000. McCarthy offered a substitute ordinance at a City Council hearing Tuesday that keeps the fine for resisting or obstructing a police officer at a range of $25 to $500.
"You listen to people and you hear them, that doesn't mean you don't make alterations," Emanuel said. "I haven't changed the objective."
ABC7Chicago reports:
"We don't want to give the impression that we're looking to do anything about the 1st Amendment except protect it," said Chicago Police Superintendent Gary McCarthy.
The Sun-Times reports that many of Emanuel's proposals remain:
Surviving measures include: more surveillance cameras; parks and beaches closed until 6 a.m.; sweeping parade restrictions and higher fees for those events and empowering McCarthy to "deputize" out-of-state law enforcement personnel experienced in handling civil unrest.
The mayor would also be granted sweeping authority to purchase goods and services for the summits -- without City Council approval or competitive bidding -- provided those items cannot be purchased under existing contracts.
"If these ordinances pass ... all bets are off. If the federal government decides to nix the permit we've already received, all bets are off. Why should people respect the law if the law does not respect them?" said Andy Thayer, a spokesman for the Coalition Against the NATO G-8 War and Poverty Agenda.
At a press conference yesterday, a broad group expressed their concerns over the mayor's plan:
An Unconstitutional Rampage
Trump and Musk are on an unconstitutional rampage, aiming for virtually every corner of the federal government. These two right-wing billionaires are targeting nurses, scientists, teachers, daycare providers, judges, veterans, air traffic controllers, and nuclear safety inspectors. No one is safe. The food stamps program, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are next. It’s an unprecedented disaster and a five-alarm fire, but there will be a reckoning. The people did not vote for this. The American people do not want this dystopian hellscape that hides behind claims of “efficiency.” Still, in reality, it is all a giveaway to corporate interests and the libertarian dreams of far-right oligarchs like Musk. Common Dreams is playing a vital role by reporting day and night on this orgy of corruption and greed, as well as what everyday people can do to organize and fight back. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
In December Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel introduced anti-protester legislation for the upcoming NATO and G-8 summits in Chicago. Part of his plan was to to increase the minimum fine from $25 to $200 and double the maximum fine to $1,000.
His plan, dubbed the 'Sit Down and Shut Up' ordinance, was slammed by many as an attack on free speech. On Tuesday, however, protesters received a partial victory when Mayor Emanuel agreed to drop the fine increase plan.
The Mayor apparently felt the heat of opposition, reports the Chicago Tribune:
The mayor had proposed doubling the maximum fine for resisting arrest to $1,000. McCarthy offered a substitute ordinance at a City Council hearing Tuesday that keeps the fine for resisting or obstructing a police officer at a range of $25 to $500.
"You listen to people and you hear them, that doesn't mean you don't make alterations," Emanuel said. "I haven't changed the objective."
ABC7Chicago reports:
"We don't want to give the impression that we're looking to do anything about the 1st Amendment except protect it," said Chicago Police Superintendent Gary McCarthy.
The Sun-Times reports that many of Emanuel's proposals remain:
Surviving measures include: more surveillance cameras; parks and beaches closed until 6 a.m.; sweeping parade restrictions and higher fees for those events and empowering McCarthy to "deputize" out-of-state law enforcement personnel experienced in handling civil unrest.
The mayor would also be granted sweeping authority to purchase goods and services for the summits -- without City Council approval or competitive bidding -- provided those items cannot be purchased under existing contracts.
"If these ordinances pass ... all bets are off. If the federal government decides to nix the permit we've already received, all bets are off. Why should people respect the law if the law does not respect them?" said Andy Thayer, a spokesman for the Coalition Against the NATO G-8 War and Poverty Agenda.
At a press conference yesterday, a broad group expressed their concerns over the mayor's plan:
In December Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel introduced anti-protester legislation for the upcoming NATO and G-8 summits in Chicago. Part of his plan was to to increase the minimum fine from $25 to $200 and double the maximum fine to $1,000.
His plan, dubbed the 'Sit Down and Shut Up' ordinance, was slammed by many as an attack on free speech. On Tuesday, however, protesters received a partial victory when Mayor Emanuel agreed to drop the fine increase plan.
The Mayor apparently felt the heat of opposition, reports the Chicago Tribune:
The mayor had proposed doubling the maximum fine for resisting arrest to $1,000. McCarthy offered a substitute ordinance at a City Council hearing Tuesday that keeps the fine for resisting or obstructing a police officer at a range of $25 to $500.
"You listen to people and you hear them, that doesn't mean you don't make alterations," Emanuel said. "I haven't changed the objective."
ABC7Chicago reports:
"We don't want to give the impression that we're looking to do anything about the 1st Amendment except protect it," said Chicago Police Superintendent Gary McCarthy.
The Sun-Times reports that many of Emanuel's proposals remain:
Surviving measures include: more surveillance cameras; parks and beaches closed until 6 a.m.; sweeping parade restrictions and higher fees for those events and empowering McCarthy to "deputize" out-of-state law enforcement personnel experienced in handling civil unrest.
The mayor would also be granted sweeping authority to purchase goods and services for the summits -- without City Council approval or competitive bidding -- provided those items cannot be purchased under existing contracts.
"If these ordinances pass ... all bets are off. If the federal government decides to nix the permit we've already received, all bets are off. Why should people respect the law if the law does not respect them?" said Andy Thayer, a spokesman for the Coalition Against the NATO G-8 War and Poverty Agenda.
At a press conference yesterday, a broad group expressed their concerns over the mayor's plan:
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.