SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Iowa's Million-Dollar Attack Ads
The millions of dollars being lavished on attack ads in Iowa is a bad taste of things to come in the 2012 presidential election
Dec 28, 2011
A tide is flowing through American politics: a tide of money unleashed by a supreme court decision that opened the floodgates to unlimited spending on advertising by so-called "super pacs" - political action committees loosely affiliated with individual candidates.
Iowa, site of the coming Republican presidential caucuses, is the first state to see the effects of the new political landscape, as duelling GOP candidates pummel each other with a cascade of negative advertising costing millions of dollars and filling the airwaves.
Turn on a television in Davenport or Cedar Rapids this week and you won't be able to miss the doom-laden advertising spots aimed at damning one or another of the Republican presidential candidates or even "the liberal Republican establishment".
But rather than ending with the now familiar "I'm Candidate X and I approve this message," these new super pac-funded ads finish with the words: "Super pac Z is responsible for the content of this message."
The arms-length relationship between the super pacs and the individual candidate's campaigns - which under election law cannot co-ordinate campaign spending or activities - allows candidates such as Mitt Romney or Newt Gingrich to disclaim any influence over the sources of the ads, in effect allowing the super pacs to throw mud while allowing the candidate to keep his or her hands clean.
The big-spending Ron Paul has no such worries, with Paul funding and supporting some of the most savage advertising aimed at both Gingrich and Romney. The Des Moines Register reported that the Paul campaign plans a $10m ad blitz in Iowa and New Hampshire for the final days.
Figures collected by the Des Moines Register show that super pacs affiliated to just two campaigns - those of Romney and Rick Perry - have spent more than $4m on television ads in Iowa alone in December.
That's on top of the more than $8m according to some estimates that will be spent this month by the official campaigns.
Some of the new breed of ads have been positive, extolling the virtues of the candidate that the super pac backs. But as the race has gotten increasingly heated, the ads have become more negative, and in some cases barely within the bounds of fact.
* Restore Our Future: super pac supporting Mitt Romney
Restore Our Future ad
While the official Romney campaign has spent $1.2m on TV advertising in Iowa, the Restore Our Future super pac has spent $2.85m, largely on negative advertising attacking Newt Gingrich - including this brutal ad above.
* Make Us Great Again: super pac supporting Rick Perry
Make Us Great Again ad
While the Perry campaign is rumoured to be spending as much as $4m on advertising in Iowa this month and January, the affiliated Make Us Great Again super pac is chipping in another $1.3m, including this mock newsreel attack ad aimed at Gingrich and Romney.
* Ron Paul presidential campaign committee
Ron Paul presidential campaign ad
Ron Paul's campaign has directly funded a mix of positive and negative campaign ads, spending upwards of $1.3m this month in Iowa - including this negative ad accusing Gingrich of serial hypocrisy.
The new super pacs are the result of a supreme court decision in 2010, the "Citizens United" ruling that blew a hole in existing campaign spending laws. Under Citizens United, the court ruled that the right to freedom of speech allowed under the constitution forbade restrictions on political advertising funded by corporate donations.
That ruling led to the formation of political action committees dubbed super pacs, officially known as "independent-expenditure only committees," which can raise unlimited sums from corporations, unions and other groups, as well as from individuals.
The airwaves of Iowa aren't alone in being flooded with political ads. Super pac advertising is also being screened in New Hampshire, South Carolina and Florida, and the amounts are sure to increase as the primaries in those states get closer.
The Republican primaries are just a warm up for the main event. The big money is waiting for the start of the general election campaign in the summer and autumn of 2012, as Democrats and Republicans approach the general election, with control of the White House and the Senate at stake. Stay tuned - or just turn on a TV set.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
A tide is flowing through American politics: a tide of money unleashed by a supreme court decision that opened the floodgates to unlimited spending on advertising by so-called "super pacs" - political action committees loosely affiliated with individual candidates.
Iowa, site of the coming Republican presidential caucuses, is the first state to see the effects of the new political landscape, as duelling GOP candidates pummel each other with a cascade of negative advertising costing millions of dollars and filling the airwaves.
Turn on a television in Davenport or Cedar Rapids this week and you won't be able to miss the doom-laden advertising spots aimed at damning one or another of the Republican presidential candidates or even "the liberal Republican establishment".
But rather than ending with the now familiar "I'm Candidate X and I approve this message," these new super pac-funded ads finish with the words: "Super pac Z is responsible for the content of this message."
The arms-length relationship between the super pacs and the individual candidate's campaigns - which under election law cannot co-ordinate campaign spending or activities - allows candidates such as Mitt Romney or Newt Gingrich to disclaim any influence over the sources of the ads, in effect allowing the super pacs to throw mud while allowing the candidate to keep his or her hands clean.
The big-spending Ron Paul has no such worries, with Paul funding and supporting some of the most savage advertising aimed at both Gingrich and Romney. The Des Moines Register reported that the Paul campaign plans a $10m ad blitz in Iowa and New Hampshire for the final days.
Figures collected by the Des Moines Register show that super pacs affiliated to just two campaigns - those of Romney and Rick Perry - have spent more than $4m on television ads in Iowa alone in December.
That's on top of the more than $8m according to some estimates that will be spent this month by the official campaigns.
Some of the new breed of ads have been positive, extolling the virtues of the candidate that the super pac backs. But as the race has gotten increasingly heated, the ads have become more negative, and in some cases barely within the bounds of fact.
* Restore Our Future: super pac supporting Mitt Romney
Restore Our Future ad
While the official Romney campaign has spent $1.2m on TV advertising in Iowa, the Restore Our Future super pac has spent $2.85m, largely on negative advertising attacking Newt Gingrich - including this brutal ad above.
* Make Us Great Again: super pac supporting Rick Perry
Make Us Great Again ad
While the Perry campaign is rumoured to be spending as much as $4m on advertising in Iowa this month and January, the affiliated Make Us Great Again super pac is chipping in another $1.3m, including this mock newsreel attack ad aimed at Gingrich and Romney.
* Ron Paul presidential campaign committee
Ron Paul presidential campaign ad
Ron Paul's campaign has directly funded a mix of positive and negative campaign ads, spending upwards of $1.3m this month in Iowa - including this negative ad accusing Gingrich of serial hypocrisy.
The new super pacs are the result of a supreme court decision in 2010, the "Citizens United" ruling that blew a hole in existing campaign spending laws. Under Citizens United, the court ruled that the right to freedom of speech allowed under the constitution forbade restrictions on political advertising funded by corporate donations.
That ruling led to the formation of political action committees dubbed super pacs, officially known as "independent-expenditure only committees," which can raise unlimited sums from corporations, unions and other groups, as well as from individuals.
The airwaves of Iowa aren't alone in being flooded with political ads. Super pac advertising is also being screened in New Hampshire, South Carolina and Florida, and the amounts are sure to increase as the primaries in those states get closer.
The Republican primaries are just a warm up for the main event. The big money is waiting for the start of the general election campaign in the summer and autumn of 2012, as Democrats and Republicans approach the general election, with control of the White House and the Senate at stake. Stay tuned - or just turn on a TV set.
A tide is flowing through American politics: a tide of money unleashed by a supreme court decision that opened the floodgates to unlimited spending on advertising by so-called "super pacs" - political action committees loosely affiliated with individual candidates.
Iowa, site of the coming Republican presidential caucuses, is the first state to see the effects of the new political landscape, as duelling GOP candidates pummel each other with a cascade of negative advertising costing millions of dollars and filling the airwaves.
Turn on a television in Davenport or Cedar Rapids this week and you won't be able to miss the doom-laden advertising spots aimed at damning one or another of the Republican presidential candidates or even "the liberal Republican establishment".
But rather than ending with the now familiar "I'm Candidate X and I approve this message," these new super pac-funded ads finish with the words: "Super pac Z is responsible for the content of this message."
The arms-length relationship between the super pacs and the individual candidate's campaigns - which under election law cannot co-ordinate campaign spending or activities - allows candidates such as Mitt Romney or Newt Gingrich to disclaim any influence over the sources of the ads, in effect allowing the super pacs to throw mud while allowing the candidate to keep his or her hands clean.
The big-spending Ron Paul has no such worries, with Paul funding and supporting some of the most savage advertising aimed at both Gingrich and Romney. The Des Moines Register reported that the Paul campaign plans a $10m ad blitz in Iowa and New Hampshire for the final days.
Figures collected by the Des Moines Register show that super pacs affiliated to just two campaigns - those of Romney and Rick Perry - have spent more than $4m on television ads in Iowa alone in December.
That's on top of the more than $8m according to some estimates that will be spent this month by the official campaigns.
Some of the new breed of ads have been positive, extolling the virtues of the candidate that the super pac backs. But as the race has gotten increasingly heated, the ads have become more negative, and in some cases barely within the bounds of fact.
* Restore Our Future: super pac supporting Mitt Romney
Restore Our Future ad
While the official Romney campaign has spent $1.2m on TV advertising in Iowa, the Restore Our Future super pac has spent $2.85m, largely on negative advertising attacking Newt Gingrich - including this brutal ad above.
* Make Us Great Again: super pac supporting Rick Perry
Make Us Great Again ad
While the Perry campaign is rumoured to be spending as much as $4m on advertising in Iowa this month and January, the affiliated Make Us Great Again super pac is chipping in another $1.3m, including this mock newsreel attack ad aimed at Gingrich and Romney.
* Ron Paul presidential campaign committee
Ron Paul presidential campaign ad
Ron Paul's campaign has directly funded a mix of positive and negative campaign ads, spending upwards of $1.3m this month in Iowa - including this negative ad accusing Gingrich of serial hypocrisy.
The new super pacs are the result of a supreme court decision in 2010, the "Citizens United" ruling that blew a hole in existing campaign spending laws. Under Citizens United, the court ruled that the right to freedom of speech allowed under the constitution forbade restrictions on political advertising funded by corporate donations.
That ruling led to the formation of political action committees dubbed super pacs, officially known as "independent-expenditure only committees," which can raise unlimited sums from corporations, unions and other groups, as well as from individuals.
The airwaves of Iowa aren't alone in being flooded with political ads. Super pac advertising is also being screened in New Hampshire, South Carolina and Florida, and the amounts are sure to increase as the primaries in those states get closer.
The Republican primaries are just a warm up for the main event. The big money is waiting for the start of the general election campaign in the summer and autumn of 2012, as Democrats and Republicans approach the general election, with control of the White House and the Senate at stake. Stay tuned - or just turn on a TV set.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.