UN Scientists Say Emission Pledges Fall Well Short of Halting Climate Change
Promises by 80 nations leave multi-billion ton gap if the worst consequences of global warming are to be avoided
UN research shows that the pledges and promises made last year by 80 countries to reduce climate change
emissions fall well short of what is needed to hold the global
temperature rise to 2C and avoid the worst consequences of global
warming.
The findings by 30 leading scientists suggest that if
countries do everything they have promised, there will still be a 5bn
tonne gap per year between their ambition and what the science says is
needed. This gap, said the UN, is the equivalent of the emissions
released by all the world's vehicles in a year. Many countries have
committed themselves to holding temperature rises to no more than 2C
(3.6F) by 2080 but to achieve this global emissions must be reduced from
56bn tonnes annually today to 44bn tonnes by 2020.
If only the weakest pledges made last year in the Copenhagen accord are implemented, emissions could be lowered to 53bn tonnes a year by 2020, leaving a gap of 9bn tonnes.
In
the best case, says the report, emissions could drop to 49bn tonnes,
reducing the gap to 5bn. But if nothing is done, then the emissions gap
would rise to 12bn tonnes by 2020 - roughly what all the world's power
stations emit.
The report, released in London ahead of next week's climate change summit in Cancun, Mexico,
will become a key document at the UN talks, adding weight to developing
countries' demands for more ambitious cuts by big emitters. Tonight it
was welcomed by the energy and climate change secretary, Chris Huhne,
who said: "[It] shows that despite some progress the world still needs
to go further and faster in cutting emissions - and that includes the EU
which must accept a more ambitious goal, of a 30% cut in emissions by 2020."
Achim
Steiner, UN environment programme director, said: "There is a gap
between the science and current ambition levels. But, what this report
shows is that the options on the table right now in the negotiations can
get us almost 60% of the way there. It can be bridged by higher
ambition by developed and developing countries, perhaps complemented by
action on a range of other pollutants such as methane from waste tips,
animal wastes and the black carbon from the inefficient burning of
biomass." The scientists said that the faster emissions are cut now,
the easier it will be later to hold temperatures steady. "To hold
temperatures to no more than a 1.5C rise, a figure which more than half
the world's countries are pressing for, would need annual 4-5% cuts in
emissions after 2020," said UNep chief scientist Joseph Alcamo.
Alcamo
said the consequences of allowing temperatures to rise over 2C were
serious. "Over 2C the intergovernmental panel on climate change (Ipcc)
suggests there is an increasing risk of icecaps melting, leading to sea
level rises, and increased risk of extreme weather events like droughts
and floods."The UN report does not put a figure on the potential cost of
reducing emissions, but Steiner said that even in a recession it should
be possible to find because between $500 and 700bn a year is presently
used to subsidise fossil fuels.
UN secretary-general Ban Ki-moon
called on countries to make good on their pledges and to further the
negotiations in Cancun. "There is no time to waste," he said. "By
closing the gap between the science and current ambition levels, we can
seize the opportunity to usher in a new era of low-carbon prosperity and
sustainable development for all."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
UN research shows that the pledges and promises made last year by 80 countries to reduce climate change
emissions fall well short of what is needed to hold the global
temperature rise to 2C and avoid the worst consequences of global
warming.
The findings by 30 leading scientists suggest that if
countries do everything they have promised, there will still be a 5bn
tonne gap per year between their ambition and what the science says is
needed. This gap, said the UN, is the equivalent of the emissions
released by all the world's vehicles in a year. Many countries have
committed themselves to holding temperature rises to no more than 2C
(3.6F) by 2080 but to achieve this global emissions must be reduced from
56bn tonnes annually today to 44bn tonnes by 2020.
If only the weakest pledges made last year in the Copenhagen accord are implemented, emissions could be lowered to 53bn tonnes a year by 2020, leaving a gap of 9bn tonnes.
In
the best case, says the report, emissions could drop to 49bn tonnes,
reducing the gap to 5bn. But if nothing is done, then the emissions gap
would rise to 12bn tonnes by 2020 - roughly what all the world's power
stations emit.
The report, released in London ahead of next week's climate change summit in Cancun, Mexico,
will become a key document at the UN talks, adding weight to developing
countries' demands for more ambitious cuts by big emitters. Tonight it
was welcomed by the energy and climate change secretary, Chris Huhne,
who said: "[It] shows that despite some progress the world still needs
to go further and faster in cutting emissions - and that includes the EU
which must accept a more ambitious goal, of a 30% cut in emissions by 2020."
Achim
Steiner, UN environment programme director, said: "There is a gap
between the science and current ambition levels. But, what this report
shows is that the options on the table right now in the negotiations can
get us almost 60% of the way there. It can be bridged by higher
ambition by developed and developing countries, perhaps complemented by
action on a range of other pollutants such as methane from waste tips,
animal wastes and the black carbon from the inefficient burning of
biomass." The scientists said that the faster emissions are cut now,
the easier it will be later to hold temperatures steady. "To hold
temperatures to no more than a 1.5C rise, a figure which more than half
the world's countries are pressing for, would need annual 4-5% cuts in
emissions after 2020," said UNep chief scientist Joseph Alcamo.
Alcamo
said the consequences of allowing temperatures to rise over 2C were
serious. "Over 2C the intergovernmental panel on climate change (Ipcc)
suggests there is an increasing risk of icecaps melting, leading to sea
level rises, and increased risk of extreme weather events like droughts
and floods."The UN report does not put a figure on the potential cost of
reducing emissions, but Steiner said that even in a recession it should
be possible to find because between $500 and 700bn a year is presently
used to subsidise fossil fuels.
UN secretary-general Ban Ki-moon
called on countries to make good on their pledges and to further the
negotiations in Cancun. "There is no time to waste," he said. "By
closing the gap between the science and current ambition levels, we can
seize the opportunity to usher in a new era of low-carbon prosperity and
sustainable development for all."
UN research shows that the pledges and promises made last year by 80 countries to reduce climate change
emissions fall well short of what is needed to hold the global
temperature rise to 2C and avoid the worst consequences of global
warming.
The findings by 30 leading scientists suggest that if
countries do everything they have promised, there will still be a 5bn
tonne gap per year between their ambition and what the science says is
needed. This gap, said the UN, is the equivalent of the emissions
released by all the world's vehicles in a year. Many countries have
committed themselves to holding temperature rises to no more than 2C
(3.6F) by 2080 but to achieve this global emissions must be reduced from
56bn tonnes annually today to 44bn tonnes by 2020.
If only the weakest pledges made last year in the Copenhagen accord are implemented, emissions could be lowered to 53bn tonnes a year by 2020, leaving a gap of 9bn tonnes.
In
the best case, says the report, emissions could drop to 49bn tonnes,
reducing the gap to 5bn. But if nothing is done, then the emissions gap
would rise to 12bn tonnes by 2020 - roughly what all the world's power
stations emit.
The report, released in London ahead of next week's climate change summit in Cancun, Mexico,
will become a key document at the UN talks, adding weight to developing
countries' demands for more ambitious cuts by big emitters. Tonight it
was welcomed by the energy and climate change secretary, Chris Huhne,
who said: "[It] shows that despite some progress the world still needs
to go further and faster in cutting emissions - and that includes the EU
which must accept a more ambitious goal, of a 30% cut in emissions by 2020."
Achim
Steiner, UN environment programme director, said: "There is a gap
between the science and current ambition levels. But, what this report
shows is that the options on the table right now in the negotiations can
get us almost 60% of the way there. It can be bridged by higher
ambition by developed and developing countries, perhaps complemented by
action on a range of other pollutants such as methane from waste tips,
animal wastes and the black carbon from the inefficient burning of
biomass." The scientists said that the faster emissions are cut now,
the easier it will be later to hold temperatures steady. "To hold
temperatures to no more than a 1.5C rise, a figure which more than half
the world's countries are pressing for, would need annual 4-5% cuts in
emissions after 2020," said UNep chief scientist Joseph Alcamo.
Alcamo
said the consequences of allowing temperatures to rise over 2C were
serious. "Over 2C the intergovernmental panel on climate change (Ipcc)
suggests there is an increasing risk of icecaps melting, leading to sea
level rises, and increased risk of extreme weather events like droughts
and floods."The UN report does not put a figure on the potential cost of
reducing emissions, but Steiner said that even in a recession it should
be possible to find because between $500 and 700bn a year is presently
used to subsidise fossil fuels.
UN secretary-general Ban Ki-moon
called on countries to make good on their pledges and to further the
negotiations in Cancun. "There is no time to waste," he said. "By
closing the gap between the science and current ambition levels, we can
seize the opportunity to usher in a new era of low-carbon prosperity and
sustainable development for all."