

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
The nuclear industry could end up facing no risk under massive tax break subsidies in the Kerry-Lieberman climate bill, according
to an important new analysis conducted for Friends of the Earth by the
research organization Earth Track. These tax breaks totaling $9.7
billion to $57.3 billion (depending on the type and number of reactors)
would come on top of the Kerry-Lieberman measure's lucrative $35.5
billion addition to the more than $22.5 billion in loan guarantees
already slated for nuclear power.
Friends of the Earth President Erich Pica said: "Doling
out an additional $1.3-$3 billion in tax breaks per new reactor means
the industry would be at the table playing almost entirely with
taxpayer money. Industry will have little to lose when a reactor goes
belly up. While taxpayers
are bankrolling the industry's nuclear gamble they would share in none
of the reactor's financial returns. In fact, all taxpayers will
receive if the reactors are built is responsibility for disposing of
the waste. By contrast, investors stand to make billions with no risk
should their reactor gambit goes belly up and enter bankruptcy."
Earth Track Founder Doug Koplow said: "These
substantial tax breaks for new reactors greatly impede market access
for competing energy sources and worsen the already substantial risks
to taxpayers from a nuclear build-out. As has clearly been shown in
U.S. mortgage markets, the likelihood of bad financial decisions rises
sharply if only other people's capital is at risk. Kerry-Lieberman's
nuclear tax breaks do just this by replacing investor equity with
taxpayer money, and allowing investment tax credits to be claimed even
before the reactor is operating. The provision to recover credits in
the event a reactor is cancelled or suspended is unlikely to be
effective in the most likely cause of termination - a bankruptcy due to
poor economics."
The memo
evaluates three tax break subsidies, describing how they work and
estimating their subsidy value to recipients in the nuclear power
sector:
According to the Earth Track analysis:
The full Earth Track analysis is available online at https://www.foe.org/more-kerry-lieberman-nuclear-subsidies/.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The nuclear industry could end up facing no risk under massive tax break subsidies in the Kerry-Lieberman climate bill, according
to an important new analysis conducted for Friends of the Earth by the
research organization Earth Track. These tax breaks totaling $9.7
billion to $57.3 billion (depending on the type and number of reactors)
would come on top of the Kerry-Lieberman measure's lucrative $35.5
billion addition to the more than $22.5 billion in loan guarantees
already slated for nuclear power.
Friends of the Earth President Erich Pica said: "Doling
out an additional $1.3-$3 billion in tax breaks per new reactor means
the industry would be at the table playing almost entirely with
taxpayer money. Industry will have little to lose when a reactor goes
belly up. While taxpayers
are bankrolling the industry's nuclear gamble they would share in none
of the reactor's financial returns. In fact, all taxpayers will
receive if the reactors are built is responsibility for disposing of
the waste. By contrast, investors stand to make billions with no risk
should their reactor gambit goes belly up and enter bankruptcy."
Earth Track Founder Doug Koplow said: "These
substantial tax breaks for new reactors greatly impede market access
for competing energy sources and worsen the already substantial risks
to taxpayers from a nuclear build-out. As has clearly been shown in
U.S. mortgage markets, the likelihood of bad financial decisions rises
sharply if only other people's capital is at risk. Kerry-Lieberman's
nuclear tax breaks do just this by replacing investor equity with
taxpayer money, and allowing investment tax credits to be claimed even
before the reactor is operating. The provision to recover credits in
the event a reactor is cancelled or suspended is unlikely to be
effective in the most likely cause of termination - a bankruptcy due to
poor economics."
The memo
evaluates three tax break subsidies, describing how they work and
estimating their subsidy value to recipients in the nuclear power
sector:
According to the Earth Track analysis:
The full Earth Track analysis is available online at https://www.foe.org/more-kerry-lieberman-nuclear-subsidies/.
The nuclear industry could end up facing no risk under massive tax break subsidies in the Kerry-Lieberman climate bill, according
to an important new analysis conducted for Friends of the Earth by the
research organization Earth Track. These tax breaks totaling $9.7
billion to $57.3 billion (depending on the type and number of reactors)
would come on top of the Kerry-Lieberman measure's lucrative $35.5
billion addition to the more than $22.5 billion in loan guarantees
already slated for nuclear power.
Friends of the Earth President Erich Pica said: "Doling
out an additional $1.3-$3 billion in tax breaks per new reactor means
the industry would be at the table playing almost entirely with
taxpayer money. Industry will have little to lose when a reactor goes
belly up. While taxpayers
are bankrolling the industry's nuclear gamble they would share in none
of the reactor's financial returns. In fact, all taxpayers will
receive if the reactors are built is responsibility for disposing of
the waste. By contrast, investors stand to make billions with no risk
should their reactor gambit goes belly up and enter bankruptcy."
Earth Track Founder Doug Koplow said: "These
substantial tax breaks for new reactors greatly impede market access
for competing energy sources and worsen the already substantial risks
to taxpayers from a nuclear build-out. As has clearly been shown in
U.S. mortgage markets, the likelihood of bad financial decisions rises
sharply if only other people's capital is at risk. Kerry-Lieberman's
nuclear tax breaks do just this by replacing investor equity with
taxpayer money, and allowing investment tax credits to be claimed even
before the reactor is operating. The provision to recover credits in
the event a reactor is cancelled or suspended is unlikely to be
effective in the most likely cause of termination - a bankruptcy due to
poor economics."
The memo
evaluates three tax break subsidies, describing how they work and
estimating their subsidy value to recipients in the nuclear power
sector:
According to the Earth Track analysis:
The full Earth Track analysis is available online at https://www.foe.org/more-kerry-lieberman-nuclear-subsidies/.