SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Challenging Conventional Wisdom on Renewable Energy's Limits
In making the case for a rapid conversion away from heavily polluting energy sources like coal and nuclear power to cleaner generation, renewable energy advocates often confront the argument that their scheme is impossible due to the intermittent nature of sun and wind.
Mar 08, 2010
But a groundbreaking study
out of North Carolina challenges that conventional wisdom: It suggests
that backup generation requirements would be modest for a system based
largely on solar and wind power, combined with efficiency,
hydroelectric power, and other renewable sources like landfill gas.
"Even
though the wind does not blow nor the sun shine all the time, careful
management, readily available storage and other renewable sources can
produce nearly all the electricity North Carolinians consume," said
author John Blackburn, professor emeritus of economics and former
chancellor at Duke University in Durham, N.C.. He's also the author of
the books "The Renewable Energy Alternative" and "Solar in Florida."
The study was published last week by the Maryland-based Institute for Energy and Environmental Research,
whose executive director, Arjun Makhijani, called it landmark research.
"North Carolina utilities and regulators and those in other states
should take this template, refine it, and make a renewable electricity
future a reality," he said.
Blackburn used hourly North Carolina
wind and solar data for a total of 123 days in the sample months of
January, April, July and October, with samples taken at three wind and
three solar sites across the state. Solar and wind power generation
were then scaled up to represent 80% -- 40% each -- of average utility
loads for the sample months, with the rest coming from the existing
hydroelectric system (8%) and assumed biomass co-generation (12%).
The
study figured in projected energy efficiency by assuming an annual
utility load of 90 billion kilowatt-hours, slightly less than the
current 125 billion kWh load, and by calculating average hourly loads
from Duke Energy's 2006 load profile with modifications to show some
reduction in summer and winter peaks due to more efficient buildings.
It also assumed increased storage capacity from a smarter electrical
grid.
In the end, with those conditions met, Blackburn
calculated that the required auxiliary generation from conventional
power plants to fill in the gaps would amount to only 6% of the annual
total generation required to meet demand in North Carolina.
"This
goes to the heart of the argument by power companies that have long
dismissed solar and wind as future technologies," said Jim Warren,
executive director of the N.C. Waste Awareness and Reduction Network, a Durham, N.C.-based nonprofit that provided research assistance to Blackburn.
The study was released just days after a new poll
from Elon University in Elon, N.C. found overwhelming public support in
North Carolina for developing the state's renewable energy capacity.
Nearly 80% of the poll's respondents said they favor new wind energy
facilities in the mountains or on the coast, while more than 83% favor
construction of solar facilities.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Sue Sturgis
Sue Sturgis is the Director and regular contributor to the Institute for Southern Study's online magazine, Facing South, with a focus on energy and environmental issues. She is a former staff writer for The News & Observer in Raleigh, North Carolina, and the Independent Weekly in Durham, North Carolina. Sue is the author or co-author of five Institute reports, including Faith in the Gulf (Aug/Sept 2008), Hurricane Katrina and the Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement (January 2008) and Blueprint for Gulf Renewal (Aug/Sept 2007). Sue holds a Masters in Journalism from New York University.
But a groundbreaking study
out of North Carolina challenges that conventional wisdom: It suggests
that backup generation requirements would be modest for a system based
largely on solar and wind power, combined with efficiency,
hydroelectric power, and other renewable sources like landfill gas.
"Even
though the wind does not blow nor the sun shine all the time, careful
management, readily available storage and other renewable sources can
produce nearly all the electricity North Carolinians consume," said
author John Blackburn, professor emeritus of economics and former
chancellor at Duke University in Durham, N.C.. He's also the author of
the books "The Renewable Energy Alternative" and "Solar in Florida."
The study was published last week by the Maryland-based Institute for Energy and Environmental Research,
whose executive director, Arjun Makhijani, called it landmark research.
"North Carolina utilities and regulators and those in other states
should take this template, refine it, and make a renewable electricity
future a reality," he said.
Blackburn used hourly North Carolina
wind and solar data for a total of 123 days in the sample months of
January, April, July and October, with samples taken at three wind and
three solar sites across the state. Solar and wind power generation
were then scaled up to represent 80% -- 40% each -- of average utility
loads for the sample months, with the rest coming from the existing
hydroelectric system (8%) and assumed biomass co-generation (12%).
The
study figured in projected energy efficiency by assuming an annual
utility load of 90 billion kilowatt-hours, slightly less than the
current 125 billion kWh load, and by calculating average hourly loads
from Duke Energy's 2006 load profile with modifications to show some
reduction in summer and winter peaks due to more efficient buildings.
It also assumed increased storage capacity from a smarter electrical
grid.
In the end, with those conditions met, Blackburn
calculated that the required auxiliary generation from conventional
power plants to fill in the gaps would amount to only 6% of the annual
total generation required to meet demand in North Carolina.
"This
goes to the heart of the argument by power companies that have long
dismissed solar and wind as future technologies," said Jim Warren,
executive director of the N.C. Waste Awareness and Reduction Network, a Durham, N.C.-based nonprofit that provided research assistance to Blackburn.
The study was released just days after a new poll
from Elon University in Elon, N.C. found overwhelming public support in
North Carolina for developing the state's renewable energy capacity.
Nearly 80% of the poll's respondents said they favor new wind energy
facilities in the mountains or on the coast, while more than 83% favor
construction of solar facilities.
Sue Sturgis
Sue Sturgis is the Director and regular contributor to the Institute for Southern Study's online magazine, Facing South, with a focus on energy and environmental issues. She is a former staff writer for The News & Observer in Raleigh, North Carolina, and the Independent Weekly in Durham, North Carolina. Sue is the author or co-author of five Institute reports, including Faith in the Gulf (Aug/Sept 2008), Hurricane Katrina and the Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement (January 2008) and Blueprint for Gulf Renewal (Aug/Sept 2007). Sue holds a Masters in Journalism from New York University.
But a groundbreaking study
out of North Carolina challenges that conventional wisdom: It suggests
that backup generation requirements would be modest for a system based
largely on solar and wind power, combined with efficiency,
hydroelectric power, and other renewable sources like landfill gas.
"Even
though the wind does not blow nor the sun shine all the time, careful
management, readily available storage and other renewable sources can
produce nearly all the electricity North Carolinians consume," said
author John Blackburn, professor emeritus of economics and former
chancellor at Duke University in Durham, N.C.. He's also the author of
the books "The Renewable Energy Alternative" and "Solar in Florida."
The study was published last week by the Maryland-based Institute for Energy and Environmental Research,
whose executive director, Arjun Makhijani, called it landmark research.
"North Carolina utilities and regulators and those in other states
should take this template, refine it, and make a renewable electricity
future a reality," he said.
Blackburn used hourly North Carolina
wind and solar data for a total of 123 days in the sample months of
January, April, July and October, with samples taken at three wind and
three solar sites across the state. Solar and wind power generation
were then scaled up to represent 80% -- 40% each -- of average utility
loads for the sample months, with the rest coming from the existing
hydroelectric system (8%) and assumed biomass co-generation (12%).
The
study figured in projected energy efficiency by assuming an annual
utility load of 90 billion kilowatt-hours, slightly less than the
current 125 billion kWh load, and by calculating average hourly loads
from Duke Energy's 2006 load profile with modifications to show some
reduction in summer and winter peaks due to more efficient buildings.
It also assumed increased storage capacity from a smarter electrical
grid.
In the end, with those conditions met, Blackburn
calculated that the required auxiliary generation from conventional
power plants to fill in the gaps would amount to only 6% of the annual
total generation required to meet demand in North Carolina.
"This
goes to the heart of the argument by power companies that have long
dismissed solar and wind as future technologies," said Jim Warren,
executive director of the N.C. Waste Awareness and Reduction Network, a Durham, N.C.-based nonprofit that provided research assistance to Blackburn.
The study was released just days after a new poll
from Elon University in Elon, N.C. found overwhelming public support in
North Carolina for developing the state's renewable energy capacity.
Nearly 80% of the poll's respondents said they favor new wind energy
facilities in the mountains or on the coast, while more than 83% favor
construction of solar facilities.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.