SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
"North Carolina utilities and regulators and those in other states should take this template, refine it, and make a renewable electricity future a reality," said IEER executive director Arjun Makhijani. (photo by flickr user Johnny Jupiter Photo)
Challenging Conventional Wisdom on Renewable Energy's Limits
In making the case for a rapid conversion away from heavily polluting energy sources like coal and nuclear power to cleaner generation, renewable energy advocates often confront the argument that their scheme is impossible due to the intermittent nature of sun and wind.
Mar 08, 2010
But a groundbreaking study
out of North Carolina challenges that conventional wisdom: It suggests
that backup generation requirements would be modest for a system based
largely on solar and wind power, combined with efficiency,
hydroelectric power, and other renewable sources like landfill gas.
"Even
though the wind does not blow nor the sun shine all the time, careful
management, readily available storage and other renewable sources can
produce nearly all the electricity North Carolinians consume," said
author John Blackburn, professor emeritus of economics and former
chancellor at Duke University in Durham, N.C.. He's also the author of
the books "The Renewable Energy Alternative" and "Solar in Florida."
The study was published last week by the Maryland-based Institute for Energy and Environmental Research,
whose executive director, Arjun Makhijani, called it landmark research.
"North Carolina utilities and regulators and those in other states
should take this template, refine it, and make a renewable electricity
future a reality," he said.
Blackburn used hourly North Carolina
wind and solar data for a total of 123 days in the sample months of
January, April, July and October, with samples taken at three wind and
three solar sites across the state. Solar and wind power generation
were then scaled up to represent 80% -- 40% each -- of average utility
loads for the sample months, with the rest coming from the existing
hydroelectric system (8%) and assumed biomass co-generation (12%).
The
study figured in projected energy efficiency by assuming an annual
utility load of 90 billion kilowatt-hours, slightly less than the
current 125 billion kWh load, and by calculating average hourly loads
from Duke Energy's 2006 load profile with modifications to show some
reduction in summer and winter peaks due to more efficient buildings.
It also assumed increased storage capacity from a smarter electrical
grid.
In the end, with those conditions met, Blackburn
calculated that the required auxiliary generation from conventional
power plants to fill in the gaps would amount to only 6% of the annual
total generation required to meet demand in North Carolina.
"This
goes to the heart of the argument by power companies that have long
dismissed solar and wind as future technologies," said Jim Warren,
executive director of the N.C. Waste Awareness and Reduction Network, a Durham, N.C.-based nonprofit that provided research assistance to Blackburn.
The study was released just days after a new poll
from Elon University in Elon, N.C. found overwhelming public support in
North Carolina for developing the state's renewable energy capacity.
Nearly 80% of the poll's respondents said they favor new wind energy
facilities in the mountains or on the coast, while more than 83% favor
construction of solar facilities.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Sue Sturgis
Sue Sturgis is the Director and regular contributor to the Institute for Southern Study's online magazine, Facing South, with a focus on energy and environmental issues. She is a former staff writer for The News & Observer in Raleigh, North Carolina, and the Independent Weekly in Durham, North Carolina. Sue is the author or co-author of five Institute reports, including Faith in the Gulf (Aug/Sept 2008), Hurricane Katrina and the Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement (January 2008) and Blueprint for Gulf Renewal (Aug/Sept 2007). Sue holds a Masters in Journalism from New York University.
But a groundbreaking study
out of North Carolina challenges that conventional wisdom: It suggests
that backup generation requirements would be modest for a system based
largely on solar and wind power, combined with efficiency,
hydroelectric power, and other renewable sources like landfill gas.
"Even
though the wind does not blow nor the sun shine all the time, careful
management, readily available storage and other renewable sources can
produce nearly all the electricity North Carolinians consume," said
author John Blackburn, professor emeritus of economics and former
chancellor at Duke University in Durham, N.C.. He's also the author of
the books "The Renewable Energy Alternative" and "Solar in Florida."
The study was published last week by the Maryland-based Institute for Energy and Environmental Research,
whose executive director, Arjun Makhijani, called it landmark research.
"North Carolina utilities and regulators and those in other states
should take this template, refine it, and make a renewable electricity
future a reality," he said.
Blackburn used hourly North Carolina
wind and solar data for a total of 123 days in the sample months of
January, April, July and October, with samples taken at three wind and
three solar sites across the state. Solar and wind power generation
were then scaled up to represent 80% -- 40% each -- of average utility
loads for the sample months, with the rest coming from the existing
hydroelectric system (8%) and assumed biomass co-generation (12%).
The
study figured in projected energy efficiency by assuming an annual
utility load of 90 billion kilowatt-hours, slightly less than the
current 125 billion kWh load, and by calculating average hourly loads
from Duke Energy's 2006 load profile with modifications to show some
reduction in summer and winter peaks due to more efficient buildings.
It also assumed increased storage capacity from a smarter electrical
grid.
In the end, with those conditions met, Blackburn
calculated that the required auxiliary generation from conventional
power plants to fill in the gaps would amount to only 6% of the annual
total generation required to meet demand in North Carolina.
"This
goes to the heart of the argument by power companies that have long
dismissed solar and wind as future technologies," said Jim Warren,
executive director of the N.C. Waste Awareness and Reduction Network, a Durham, N.C.-based nonprofit that provided research assistance to Blackburn.
The study was released just days after a new poll
from Elon University in Elon, N.C. found overwhelming public support in
North Carolina for developing the state's renewable energy capacity.
Nearly 80% of the poll's respondents said they favor new wind energy
facilities in the mountains or on the coast, while more than 83% favor
construction of solar facilities.
Sue Sturgis
Sue Sturgis is the Director and regular contributor to the Institute for Southern Study's online magazine, Facing South, with a focus on energy and environmental issues. She is a former staff writer for The News & Observer in Raleigh, North Carolina, and the Independent Weekly in Durham, North Carolina. Sue is the author or co-author of five Institute reports, including Faith in the Gulf (Aug/Sept 2008), Hurricane Katrina and the Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement (January 2008) and Blueprint for Gulf Renewal (Aug/Sept 2007). Sue holds a Masters in Journalism from New York University.
But a groundbreaking study
out of North Carolina challenges that conventional wisdom: It suggests
that backup generation requirements would be modest for a system based
largely on solar and wind power, combined with efficiency,
hydroelectric power, and other renewable sources like landfill gas.
"Even
though the wind does not blow nor the sun shine all the time, careful
management, readily available storage and other renewable sources can
produce nearly all the electricity North Carolinians consume," said
author John Blackburn, professor emeritus of economics and former
chancellor at Duke University in Durham, N.C.. He's also the author of
the books "The Renewable Energy Alternative" and "Solar in Florida."
The study was published last week by the Maryland-based Institute for Energy and Environmental Research,
whose executive director, Arjun Makhijani, called it landmark research.
"North Carolina utilities and regulators and those in other states
should take this template, refine it, and make a renewable electricity
future a reality," he said.
Blackburn used hourly North Carolina
wind and solar data for a total of 123 days in the sample months of
January, April, July and October, with samples taken at three wind and
three solar sites across the state. Solar and wind power generation
were then scaled up to represent 80% -- 40% each -- of average utility
loads for the sample months, with the rest coming from the existing
hydroelectric system (8%) and assumed biomass co-generation (12%).
The
study figured in projected energy efficiency by assuming an annual
utility load of 90 billion kilowatt-hours, slightly less than the
current 125 billion kWh load, and by calculating average hourly loads
from Duke Energy's 2006 load profile with modifications to show some
reduction in summer and winter peaks due to more efficient buildings.
It also assumed increased storage capacity from a smarter electrical
grid.
In the end, with those conditions met, Blackburn
calculated that the required auxiliary generation from conventional
power plants to fill in the gaps would amount to only 6% of the annual
total generation required to meet demand in North Carolina.
"This
goes to the heart of the argument by power companies that have long
dismissed solar and wind as future technologies," said Jim Warren,
executive director of the N.C. Waste Awareness and Reduction Network, a Durham, N.C.-based nonprofit that provided research assistance to Blackburn.
The study was released just days after a new poll
from Elon University in Elon, N.C. found overwhelming public support in
North Carolina for developing the state's renewable energy capacity.
Nearly 80% of the poll's respondents said they favor new wind energy
facilities in the mountains or on the coast, while more than 83% favor
construction of solar facilities.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.