SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
The Day After Tomorrow Might Have Been Yesterday
Feb 13, 2010
WASHINGTON - When the 2004 film
"The Day After Tomorrow" depicted the northern United States buried
under tens of feet of snow following an abrupt change in global climate
patterns, it cemented the association in the public consciousness
between climate change and extreme weather events.
While the three feet or
so of snowfall in Washington and throughout the mid-Atlantic U.S. coast
this past week was a far cry from the tidal waves and walls of ice that
haunted Jake Gyllenhaal and Dennis Quaid in the science-fiction
thriller, it has nonetheless been an exceptional event - and one that
has ground the capital to an extended standstill.
As
Washingtonians finally dug Friday to brave clogged metro trains and icy
roads on the way to the office, one of the lasting impacts of the past
week is the discussions it has provoked about how climate change has
impacted the current weather - and how this weather might impact the
ongoing debate here over how the U.S. government should address the
threat of climate change.
Dubbed the "snowpocalypse" - or
sometimes "snowpocalypse II" in deference to the previous storm that
blanketed Washington in December - the scenes on the streets this past
week have actually seemed eerily post-apocalyptic. Silent, monochrome
and empty, they have, for some, forebode a world in which no action is
taken to stem the effects of climate change.
Others, though, see
the wintry landscape as undermining the direness - or even the reality
- of the threat posed by climate change, which they prefer to refer to
as global warming, thus underscoring what they see as the incongruences
between the phenomenon and the snowy spell.
On Wednesday, for
example, climate change denier Sen. James Inhofe told The New York
Times that the recent weather furthered doubts over whether climate
change is "unequivocal" or a human-made phenomenon.
If anything, though, the weather should help dispel those doubts, contend major climate scientists and activists.
"Record
snow is not in any way, shape, or form evidence against climate science
and in fact it is largely consistent with it," Joseph Romm, a former
Energy Department official in President Bill Clinton's administration
and the editor of the Center for American Progress's Climate Progress
blog, said Thursday.
"I wouldn't want to say global warming is
the cause or the sole cause [of the snowstorms]&but we are in a
warming trend," he said. "It is absurd when we are in an overall
warming trend that a snowstorm is evidence of a cooling trend. But the
anti-science side - the ideologues - have been trying to push the idea
that we're in a cooling trend and that this is evidence of that."
In
fact, increased snowfall is entirely in line with climate projections,
said Jeff Masters, a meteorologist with WeatherUnderground.com.
While
the current storms are likely due to "natural variability" - the "jet
stream this year [happened to] set up in a path that includes these
cities" on the eastern U.S. seaboard, he explained - they are
nonetheless historically "extraordinary" and it is reasonable to expect
global warming to bring more such storms in the future.
Romm
agrees. "You heat up the planet and you put more moisture in the
atmosphere, you get the more intense precipitation that has been
observed globally and has been observed in the United States," he said.
In
Washington, this "intense precipitation" - by regional standards - has
shut down much of the federal government since Feb. 5. All votes in the
House of Representatives were suspended for the week and the Senate
only returned to business Thursday. Any number of events have been canceled - from think tank discussions to concerts.
Washington-area
schools were given "snow days" that lasted at least through Thursday
and non-essential federal government employees were granted an excused
leave up through Friday morning.
The virtual shut-down of the
federal government cost the government about 100 million dollars per
day in lost productivity, according to the Office of Personnel
Management, which decides whether or not government employees will be
required to come in to work.
Reports say at least 20 deaths in
the mid-Atlantic region have been attributed to the storm and 4,000
homes were without power late Thursday night. Cars had swerved and
gotten stuck in snow banks, post went undelivered, trash uncollected,
grocery stores' shelves had been pillaged and their queues evoked
numerous references to Soviet-era breadlines in local newspapers.
Somewhere
between the 30 or so inches Saturday and the 10 more Wednesday night,
this winter officially became the worst the U.S. capital has seen since
precipitation has been recorded, with a tally of 55.6 inches of snow so
far this season - a number due to increase when another flurry hits
Monday.
These storms have also added another pinch of
contentiousness to the climate change debate - one of the many
political tempests that have haunted the city since the summer.
Perception,
some fear, may be especially affected by the fact that debate over a
phenomenon called "global warming" is taking place in a winter
wonderland. It is possible, for instance, that the wintry weather may
buoy the arguments of climate change deniers and lead to less
willingness by the public to take decisive action on the issue -
especially action that may be expensive or inconvenient.
Masters
admits it could be a problem. "That's a difficult thing. And that's why
we're here [talking to reporters], we're here to change perception and
present the science," he said.
That science, said Romm,
"contends you will see more snowstorms due to global warming. You tend
to get more snowstorms in winters that are warmer on average."
But
snowstorms will not be the only storms in a changed climate. A study in
the Jan. 22 issue of the journal Science projected that while the
overall number of hurricanes will decrease over the next 80 years,
Category 4 and 5 hurricanes - those with sustained winds of 131 miles
per hour and above - will nearly double in frequency. The most intense
of these will more than triple in frequency.
Previous studies
have also pointed to a pattern of fewer but more intense storms as
ocean temperatures rise over the next century.
Friday morning, sun and blue skies greeted Washingtonians - from senators to cafeteria workers.
"We're
not in a deep freeze. According to satellite records, this is the
warmest winter on record," Romm said Thursday. "No individual weather
event can be directly ascribed to global warming, but global warming
loads the dice, makes extreme events more likely."
"We still have winter," he added.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
WASHINGTON - When the 2004 film
"The Day After Tomorrow" depicted the northern United States buried
under tens of feet of snow following an abrupt change in global climate
patterns, it cemented the association in the public consciousness
between climate change and extreme weather events.
While the three feet or
so of snowfall in Washington and throughout the mid-Atlantic U.S. coast
this past week was a far cry from the tidal waves and walls of ice that
haunted Jake Gyllenhaal and Dennis Quaid in the science-fiction
thriller, it has nonetheless been an exceptional event - and one that
has ground the capital to an extended standstill.
As
Washingtonians finally dug Friday to brave clogged metro trains and icy
roads on the way to the office, one of the lasting impacts of the past
week is the discussions it has provoked about how climate change has
impacted the current weather - and how this weather might impact the
ongoing debate here over how the U.S. government should address the
threat of climate change.
Dubbed the "snowpocalypse" - or
sometimes "snowpocalypse II" in deference to the previous storm that
blanketed Washington in December - the scenes on the streets this past
week have actually seemed eerily post-apocalyptic. Silent, monochrome
and empty, they have, for some, forebode a world in which no action is
taken to stem the effects of climate change.
Others, though, see
the wintry landscape as undermining the direness - or even the reality
- of the threat posed by climate change, which they prefer to refer to
as global warming, thus underscoring what they see as the incongruences
between the phenomenon and the snowy spell.
On Wednesday, for
example, climate change denier Sen. James Inhofe told The New York
Times that the recent weather furthered doubts over whether climate
change is "unequivocal" or a human-made phenomenon.
If anything, though, the weather should help dispel those doubts, contend major climate scientists and activists.
"Record
snow is not in any way, shape, or form evidence against climate science
and in fact it is largely consistent with it," Joseph Romm, a former
Energy Department official in President Bill Clinton's administration
and the editor of the Center for American Progress's Climate Progress
blog, said Thursday.
"I wouldn't want to say global warming is
the cause or the sole cause [of the snowstorms]&but we are in a
warming trend," he said. "It is absurd when we are in an overall
warming trend that a snowstorm is evidence of a cooling trend. But the
anti-science side - the ideologues - have been trying to push the idea
that we're in a cooling trend and that this is evidence of that."
In
fact, increased snowfall is entirely in line with climate projections,
said Jeff Masters, a meteorologist with WeatherUnderground.com.
While
the current storms are likely due to "natural variability" - the "jet
stream this year [happened to] set up in a path that includes these
cities" on the eastern U.S. seaboard, he explained - they are
nonetheless historically "extraordinary" and it is reasonable to expect
global warming to bring more such storms in the future.
Romm
agrees. "You heat up the planet and you put more moisture in the
atmosphere, you get the more intense precipitation that has been
observed globally and has been observed in the United States," he said.
In
Washington, this "intense precipitation" - by regional standards - has
shut down much of the federal government since Feb. 5. All votes in the
House of Representatives were suspended for the week and the Senate
only returned to business Thursday. Any number of events have been canceled - from think tank discussions to concerts.
Washington-area
schools were given "snow days" that lasted at least through Thursday
and non-essential federal government employees were granted an excused
leave up through Friday morning.
The virtual shut-down of the
federal government cost the government about 100 million dollars per
day in lost productivity, according to the Office of Personnel
Management, which decides whether or not government employees will be
required to come in to work.
Reports say at least 20 deaths in
the mid-Atlantic region have been attributed to the storm and 4,000
homes were without power late Thursday night. Cars had swerved and
gotten stuck in snow banks, post went undelivered, trash uncollected,
grocery stores' shelves had been pillaged and their queues evoked
numerous references to Soviet-era breadlines in local newspapers.
Somewhere
between the 30 or so inches Saturday and the 10 more Wednesday night,
this winter officially became the worst the U.S. capital has seen since
precipitation has been recorded, with a tally of 55.6 inches of snow so
far this season - a number due to increase when another flurry hits
Monday.
These storms have also added another pinch of
contentiousness to the climate change debate - one of the many
political tempests that have haunted the city since the summer.
Perception,
some fear, may be especially affected by the fact that debate over a
phenomenon called "global warming" is taking place in a winter
wonderland. It is possible, for instance, that the wintry weather may
buoy the arguments of climate change deniers and lead to less
willingness by the public to take decisive action on the issue -
especially action that may be expensive or inconvenient.
Masters
admits it could be a problem. "That's a difficult thing. And that's why
we're here [talking to reporters], we're here to change perception and
present the science," he said.
That science, said Romm,
"contends you will see more snowstorms due to global warming. You tend
to get more snowstorms in winters that are warmer on average."
But
snowstorms will not be the only storms in a changed climate. A study in
the Jan. 22 issue of the journal Science projected that while the
overall number of hurricanes will decrease over the next 80 years,
Category 4 and 5 hurricanes - those with sustained winds of 131 miles
per hour and above - will nearly double in frequency. The most intense
of these will more than triple in frequency.
Previous studies
have also pointed to a pattern of fewer but more intense storms as
ocean temperatures rise over the next century.
Friday morning, sun and blue skies greeted Washingtonians - from senators to cafeteria workers.
"We're
not in a deep freeze. According to satellite records, this is the
warmest winter on record," Romm said Thursday. "No individual weather
event can be directly ascribed to global warming, but global warming
loads the dice, makes extreme events more likely."
"We still have winter," he added.
WASHINGTON - When the 2004 film
"The Day After Tomorrow" depicted the northern United States buried
under tens of feet of snow following an abrupt change in global climate
patterns, it cemented the association in the public consciousness
between climate change and extreme weather events.
While the three feet or
so of snowfall in Washington and throughout the mid-Atlantic U.S. coast
this past week was a far cry from the tidal waves and walls of ice that
haunted Jake Gyllenhaal and Dennis Quaid in the science-fiction
thriller, it has nonetheless been an exceptional event - and one that
has ground the capital to an extended standstill.
As
Washingtonians finally dug Friday to brave clogged metro trains and icy
roads on the way to the office, one of the lasting impacts of the past
week is the discussions it has provoked about how climate change has
impacted the current weather - and how this weather might impact the
ongoing debate here over how the U.S. government should address the
threat of climate change.
Dubbed the "snowpocalypse" - or
sometimes "snowpocalypse II" in deference to the previous storm that
blanketed Washington in December - the scenes on the streets this past
week have actually seemed eerily post-apocalyptic. Silent, monochrome
and empty, they have, for some, forebode a world in which no action is
taken to stem the effects of climate change.
Others, though, see
the wintry landscape as undermining the direness - or even the reality
- of the threat posed by climate change, which they prefer to refer to
as global warming, thus underscoring what they see as the incongruences
between the phenomenon and the snowy spell.
On Wednesday, for
example, climate change denier Sen. James Inhofe told The New York
Times that the recent weather furthered doubts over whether climate
change is "unequivocal" or a human-made phenomenon.
If anything, though, the weather should help dispel those doubts, contend major climate scientists and activists.
"Record
snow is not in any way, shape, or form evidence against climate science
and in fact it is largely consistent with it," Joseph Romm, a former
Energy Department official in President Bill Clinton's administration
and the editor of the Center for American Progress's Climate Progress
blog, said Thursday.
"I wouldn't want to say global warming is
the cause or the sole cause [of the snowstorms]&but we are in a
warming trend," he said. "It is absurd when we are in an overall
warming trend that a snowstorm is evidence of a cooling trend. But the
anti-science side - the ideologues - have been trying to push the idea
that we're in a cooling trend and that this is evidence of that."
In
fact, increased snowfall is entirely in line with climate projections,
said Jeff Masters, a meteorologist with WeatherUnderground.com.
While
the current storms are likely due to "natural variability" - the "jet
stream this year [happened to] set up in a path that includes these
cities" on the eastern U.S. seaboard, he explained - they are
nonetheless historically "extraordinary" and it is reasonable to expect
global warming to bring more such storms in the future.
Romm
agrees. "You heat up the planet and you put more moisture in the
atmosphere, you get the more intense precipitation that has been
observed globally and has been observed in the United States," he said.
In
Washington, this "intense precipitation" - by regional standards - has
shut down much of the federal government since Feb. 5. All votes in the
House of Representatives were suspended for the week and the Senate
only returned to business Thursday. Any number of events have been canceled - from think tank discussions to concerts.
Washington-area
schools were given "snow days" that lasted at least through Thursday
and non-essential federal government employees were granted an excused
leave up through Friday morning.
The virtual shut-down of the
federal government cost the government about 100 million dollars per
day in lost productivity, according to the Office of Personnel
Management, which decides whether or not government employees will be
required to come in to work.
Reports say at least 20 deaths in
the mid-Atlantic region have been attributed to the storm and 4,000
homes were without power late Thursday night. Cars had swerved and
gotten stuck in snow banks, post went undelivered, trash uncollected,
grocery stores' shelves had been pillaged and their queues evoked
numerous references to Soviet-era breadlines in local newspapers.
Somewhere
between the 30 or so inches Saturday and the 10 more Wednesday night,
this winter officially became the worst the U.S. capital has seen since
precipitation has been recorded, with a tally of 55.6 inches of snow so
far this season - a number due to increase when another flurry hits
Monday.
These storms have also added another pinch of
contentiousness to the climate change debate - one of the many
political tempests that have haunted the city since the summer.
Perception,
some fear, may be especially affected by the fact that debate over a
phenomenon called "global warming" is taking place in a winter
wonderland. It is possible, for instance, that the wintry weather may
buoy the arguments of climate change deniers and lead to less
willingness by the public to take decisive action on the issue -
especially action that may be expensive or inconvenient.
Masters
admits it could be a problem. "That's a difficult thing. And that's why
we're here [talking to reporters], we're here to change perception and
present the science," he said.
That science, said Romm,
"contends you will see more snowstorms due to global warming. You tend
to get more snowstorms in winters that are warmer on average."
But
snowstorms will not be the only storms in a changed climate. A study in
the Jan. 22 issue of the journal Science projected that while the
overall number of hurricanes will decrease over the next 80 years,
Category 4 and 5 hurricanes - those with sustained winds of 131 miles
per hour and above - will nearly double in frequency. The most intense
of these will more than triple in frequency.
Previous studies
have also pointed to a pattern of fewer but more intense storms as
ocean temperatures rise over the next century.
Friday morning, sun and blue skies greeted Washingtonians - from senators to cafeteria workers.
"We're
not in a deep freeze. According to satellite records, this is the
warmest winter on record," Romm said Thursday. "No individual weather
event can be directly ascribed to global warming, but global warming
loads the dice, makes extreme events more likely."
"We still have winter," he added.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.