SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Rendition Victim Moves to Sue US
A
Canadian man who was deported by US officials to Syria, where he was
imprisoned and allegedly tortured, has appealed a court ruling
preventing him from suing the US.
Maher Arar filed a lawsuit before the US supreme court on Monday,
appealing a lower court ruling that rejected his case because it
involved national security information.
Feb 03, 2010
A
Canadian man who was deported by US officials to Syria, where he was
imprisoned and allegedly tortured, has appealed a court ruling
preventing him from suing the US.
Maher Arar filed a lawsuit before the US supreme court on Monday,
appealing a lower court ruling that rejected his case because it
involved national security information.
Arar
was arrested by US authorities while transiting through New York's JFK
International Airport in 2002, on his way home to Canada from a family
vacation in Tunis.
He was detained on information shared by Canadian police that suggested he had ties to "terrorist" groups.
'Too sensitive'
US authorities held him in solitary confinement and interrogated him for nearly two weeks before deporting him to Syria.
He was imprisoned for a year in Damascus, the Syrian capital, during
which time he says he was tortured before finally being released and
returned to Canada.
A Canadian commission eventually cleared him of any connections to
"terrorist" organisations and concluded that he had been tortured.
He was awarded $10.5m in compensation.
Arar's suit before the Supreme Court questions whether "federal
officials who conspired with Syrian officials to subject an individual
in US custody to torture in Syria may be sued for damages".
David Cole, a lawyer for Arar, said: "The courts below ruled that
federal officials cannot be sued for sending an innocent man to Syria
to be tortured because the case would be too sensitive."
He said: "We hope the supreme court will reaffirm the role of checks and balances and afford Mr Arar his day in court."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
A
Canadian man who was deported by US officials to Syria, where he was
imprisoned and allegedly tortured, has appealed a court ruling
preventing him from suing the US.
Maher Arar filed a lawsuit before the US supreme court on Monday,
appealing a lower court ruling that rejected his case because it
involved national security information.
Arar
was arrested by US authorities while transiting through New York's JFK
International Airport in 2002, on his way home to Canada from a family
vacation in Tunis.
He was detained on information shared by Canadian police that suggested he had ties to "terrorist" groups.
'Too sensitive'
US authorities held him in solitary confinement and interrogated him for nearly two weeks before deporting him to Syria.
He was imprisoned for a year in Damascus, the Syrian capital, during
which time he says he was tortured before finally being released and
returned to Canada.
A Canadian commission eventually cleared him of any connections to
"terrorist" organisations and concluded that he had been tortured.
He was awarded $10.5m in compensation.
Arar's suit before the Supreme Court questions whether "federal
officials who conspired with Syrian officials to subject an individual
in US custody to torture in Syria may be sued for damages".
David Cole, a lawyer for Arar, said: "The courts below ruled that
federal officials cannot be sued for sending an innocent man to Syria
to be tortured because the case would be too sensitive."
He said: "We hope the supreme court will reaffirm the role of checks and balances and afford Mr Arar his day in court."
A
Canadian man who was deported by US officials to Syria, where he was
imprisoned and allegedly tortured, has appealed a court ruling
preventing him from suing the US.
Maher Arar filed a lawsuit before the US supreme court on Monday,
appealing a lower court ruling that rejected his case because it
involved national security information.
Arar
was arrested by US authorities while transiting through New York's JFK
International Airport in 2002, on his way home to Canada from a family
vacation in Tunis.
He was detained on information shared by Canadian police that suggested he had ties to "terrorist" groups.
'Too sensitive'
US authorities held him in solitary confinement and interrogated him for nearly two weeks before deporting him to Syria.
He was imprisoned for a year in Damascus, the Syrian capital, during
which time he says he was tortured before finally being released and
returned to Canada.
A Canadian commission eventually cleared him of any connections to
"terrorist" organisations and concluded that he had been tortured.
He was awarded $10.5m in compensation.
Arar's suit before the Supreme Court questions whether "federal
officials who conspired with Syrian officials to subject an individual
in US custody to torture in Syria may be sued for damages".
David Cole, a lawyer for Arar, said: "The courts below ruled that
federal officials cannot be sued for sending an innocent man to Syria
to be tortured because the case would be too sensitive."
He said: "We hope the supreme court will reaffirm the role of checks and balances and afford Mr Arar his day in court."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.