

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Whoever scheduled the special election for the U.S. Senate seat vacated by the death of Edward Kennedy on January 19 did Barack Obama no favors.
The president did not need the tension of a too-close-for comfort electoral test on the day before the one-year anniversary of his inauguration.
Democrat Martha Coakley loss to Republican Scott Brown in Tuesday's voting was a painful blow to the president.
One year into his presidency, he has been hit with the most painful of all measures of the success or failure of his presidency -- the loss of the filibuster-proof majority he needed to pass health-care reform and the rest of his agenda.
Obama and his aides need to take seriously the wake-up call they got from Massachusetts.
The results serves as a reminder that the White House and the Democratic Congress must do more to connect with Americans who are worried about the economy and uncertain about whether this administration has got its act together.
Coakley should have won without a problem in a state that sends an entirely Democratic delegation to the Congress and that has not backed a Republican for president in a quarter century.
Instead, she got beat -- admittedly in a odd election.
But 2010 could have a lot of odd elections.
Democrats got their wake-up call too late and responded too slowly in Massachusetts.
They cannot afford to continue stumbling.
The party must open an internal (and to some extent external) discussion about their circumstance going into a critical election year.
In particular, they must recognize that they have mismanaged the health-care debate - confusing Americans, offering less than anyone bargained for and spending too much time trying to satisfy the demands of big insurance firms and the pharmaceutical industry. They also must recognize that they have spent too little time focused on jobs and holding Wall Street and the big banks to account.
Obama's final push for Coakley was too little, too late.
But the message was right.
He needs to be more populist, not less. He needs to go after the bankers -- not go easier on them, as some conservative Democrats will counsel.
Of course, the president and congressional Democrats need to get more actively engaged in muscling up and making real the promise of health-care reform - which must be passed in order to record a major accomplishment. But their primary focus has to be on the too-long neglected economic mess that threatens to undermine the party's prospects this fall.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Whoever scheduled the special election for the U.S. Senate seat vacated by the death of Edward Kennedy on January 19 did Barack Obama no favors.
The president did not need the tension of a too-close-for comfort electoral test on the day before the one-year anniversary of his inauguration.
Democrat Martha Coakley loss to Republican Scott Brown in Tuesday's voting was a painful blow to the president.
One year into his presidency, he has been hit with the most painful of all measures of the success or failure of his presidency -- the loss of the filibuster-proof majority he needed to pass health-care reform and the rest of his agenda.
Obama and his aides need to take seriously the wake-up call they got from Massachusetts.
The results serves as a reminder that the White House and the Democratic Congress must do more to connect with Americans who are worried about the economy and uncertain about whether this administration has got its act together.
Coakley should have won without a problem in a state that sends an entirely Democratic delegation to the Congress and that has not backed a Republican for president in a quarter century.
Instead, she got beat -- admittedly in a odd election.
But 2010 could have a lot of odd elections.
Democrats got their wake-up call too late and responded too slowly in Massachusetts.
They cannot afford to continue stumbling.
The party must open an internal (and to some extent external) discussion about their circumstance going into a critical election year.
In particular, they must recognize that they have mismanaged the health-care debate - confusing Americans, offering less than anyone bargained for and spending too much time trying to satisfy the demands of big insurance firms and the pharmaceutical industry. They also must recognize that they have spent too little time focused on jobs and holding Wall Street and the big banks to account.
Obama's final push for Coakley was too little, too late.
But the message was right.
He needs to be more populist, not less. He needs to go after the bankers -- not go easier on them, as some conservative Democrats will counsel.
Of course, the president and congressional Democrats need to get more actively engaged in muscling up and making real the promise of health-care reform - which must be passed in order to record a major accomplishment. But their primary focus has to be on the too-long neglected economic mess that threatens to undermine the party's prospects this fall.
Whoever scheduled the special election for the U.S. Senate seat vacated by the death of Edward Kennedy on January 19 did Barack Obama no favors.
The president did not need the tension of a too-close-for comfort electoral test on the day before the one-year anniversary of his inauguration.
Democrat Martha Coakley loss to Republican Scott Brown in Tuesday's voting was a painful blow to the president.
One year into his presidency, he has been hit with the most painful of all measures of the success or failure of his presidency -- the loss of the filibuster-proof majority he needed to pass health-care reform and the rest of his agenda.
Obama and his aides need to take seriously the wake-up call they got from Massachusetts.
The results serves as a reminder that the White House and the Democratic Congress must do more to connect with Americans who are worried about the economy and uncertain about whether this administration has got its act together.
Coakley should have won without a problem in a state that sends an entirely Democratic delegation to the Congress and that has not backed a Republican for president in a quarter century.
Instead, she got beat -- admittedly in a odd election.
But 2010 could have a lot of odd elections.
Democrats got their wake-up call too late and responded too slowly in Massachusetts.
They cannot afford to continue stumbling.
The party must open an internal (and to some extent external) discussion about their circumstance going into a critical election year.
In particular, they must recognize that they have mismanaged the health-care debate - confusing Americans, offering less than anyone bargained for and spending too much time trying to satisfy the demands of big insurance firms and the pharmaceutical industry. They also must recognize that they have spent too little time focused on jobs and holding Wall Street and the big banks to account.
Obama's final push for Coakley was too little, too late.
But the message was right.
He needs to be more populist, not less. He needs to go after the bankers -- not go easier on them, as some conservative Democrats will counsel.
Of course, the president and congressional Democrats need to get more actively engaged in muscling up and making real the promise of health-care reform - which must be passed in order to record a major accomplishment. But their primary focus has to be on the too-long neglected economic mess that threatens to undermine the party's prospects this fall.