SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Canadian Diplomat Alleges Troops in Afghanistan Were Complicit in Torture
Senior diplomat formerly stationed in Kabul claims troops 'handed over for severe torture a lot of innocent people'
Nov 21, 2009
The Canadian government was fending off calls for a public inquiry on torture today after allegations from one of its senior diplomats that Canada was complicit in the torture of Afghan detainees.
Richard Colvin, who was second in command at Canada's Kabul embassy in 2006 and 2007, said that Afghans swept up in security sweeps by Canadian troops during that time were routinely handed over to the Afghan intelligence services.
"According to our information, the likelihood is that all the Afghans we handed over were tortured," Colvin told Canada's parliament. "For interrogators in Kandahar, it was standard operating procedure.
"In other words, we detained, and handed over for severe torture, a lot of innocent people."
Colvin said his frequent memos about the abuse were ignored and that senior officials attempted to cover up Canada's complicity until prisoner transfer procedures were changed in 2007, partly as a result of his complaints.
The allegations have shocked a country that generally regards itself as an upholder of humanitarian values and intensified scrutiny of Canada's military presence in Afghanistan. Canada has about 2,800 troops based in Kandahar province, who are due to be withdrawn in 2011.
The government has denied the allegations and attacked Colvin's credibility.
"There are incredible holes in the story that have to be examined," the defence minister, Peter MacKay, told parliament yesterday, arguing that Colvin had based his accounts on Taliban propaganda. He rejected opposition calls for a public inquiry.
"It doesn't stand the test of cross-examination. It doesn't stand the test of credibility," MacKay said.
Government attacks on Colvin's credibility have been undermined by its admission that it acted on his complaints about the treatment of detainees in May 2007, a year after he began sending memos. Colvin now holds a senior intelligence post in the Washington embassy.
Colvin said his complaints about the torture of Afghans were "mostly ignored" for a year. After that he was told by government officials to keep quiet and to express his concerns by telephone rather than put them on paper.
He said "the paper trail on detainees" was reduced after the arrival of Arif Lalani, Canada's ambassador in Kabul from May 2007. "Reports on detainees began sometimes to be censored with crucial information removed," he said.
Senior Canadian officials and military officers deny having seen Colvin's dispatches. General Rick Hillier, who commanded Canadian forces in Kandahar in 2006 and has since retired, said: "I don't remember reading a single one of those cables ... He doesn't stick out in my mind."
Hillier rejected the allegation that Canada was complicit in war crimes and compared the uproar to "howling at the moon".
"Even in our own prisons somebody can get beaten up," he said. "We know that."
Gordon O'Connor, Canada's defence minister in 2006 and 2007, suggested yesterday that Colvin's memos might not have travelled all the way up the government hierarchy.
"Reports like this may have occurred and gone through the system and people at lower levels may have decided there's no credibility to different reports," O'Connor said.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The Canadian government was fending off calls for a public inquiry on torture today after allegations from one of its senior diplomats that Canada was complicit in the torture of Afghan detainees.
Richard Colvin, who was second in command at Canada's Kabul embassy in 2006 and 2007, said that Afghans swept up in security sweeps by Canadian troops during that time were routinely handed over to the Afghan intelligence services.
"According to our information, the likelihood is that all the Afghans we handed over were tortured," Colvin told Canada's parliament. "For interrogators in Kandahar, it was standard operating procedure.
"In other words, we detained, and handed over for severe torture, a lot of innocent people."
Colvin said his frequent memos about the abuse were ignored and that senior officials attempted to cover up Canada's complicity until prisoner transfer procedures were changed in 2007, partly as a result of his complaints.
The allegations have shocked a country that generally regards itself as an upholder of humanitarian values and intensified scrutiny of Canada's military presence in Afghanistan. Canada has about 2,800 troops based in Kandahar province, who are due to be withdrawn in 2011.
The government has denied the allegations and attacked Colvin's credibility.
"There are incredible holes in the story that have to be examined," the defence minister, Peter MacKay, told parliament yesterday, arguing that Colvin had based his accounts on Taliban propaganda. He rejected opposition calls for a public inquiry.
"It doesn't stand the test of cross-examination. It doesn't stand the test of credibility," MacKay said.
Government attacks on Colvin's credibility have been undermined by its admission that it acted on his complaints about the treatment of detainees in May 2007, a year after he began sending memos. Colvin now holds a senior intelligence post in the Washington embassy.
Colvin said his complaints about the torture of Afghans were "mostly ignored" for a year. After that he was told by government officials to keep quiet and to express his concerns by telephone rather than put them on paper.
He said "the paper trail on detainees" was reduced after the arrival of Arif Lalani, Canada's ambassador in Kabul from May 2007. "Reports on detainees began sometimes to be censored with crucial information removed," he said.
Senior Canadian officials and military officers deny having seen Colvin's dispatches. General Rick Hillier, who commanded Canadian forces in Kandahar in 2006 and has since retired, said: "I don't remember reading a single one of those cables ... He doesn't stick out in my mind."
Hillier rejected the allegation that Canada was complicit in war crimes and compared the uproar to "howling at the moon".
"Even in our own prisons somebody can get beaten up," he said. "We know that."
Gordon O'Connor, Canada's defence minister in 2006 and 2007, suggested yesterday that Colvin's memos might not have travelled all the way up the government hierarchy.
"Reports like this may have occurred and gone through the system and people at lower levels may have decided there's no credibility to different reports," O'Connor said.
The Canadian government was fending off calls for a public inquiry on torture today after allegations from one of its senior diplomats that Canada was complicit in the torture of Afghan detainees.
Richard Colvin, who was second in command at Canada's Kabul embassy in 2006 and 2007, said that Afghans swept up in security sweeps by Canadian troops during that time were routinely handed over to the Afghan intelligence services.
"According to our information, the likelihood is that all the Afghans we handed over were tortured," Colvin told Canada's parliament. "For interrogators in Kandahar, it was standard operating procedure.
"In other words, we detained, and handed over for severe torture, a lot of innocent people."
Colvin said his frequent memos about the abuse were ignored and that senior officials attempted to cover up Canada's complicity until prisoner transfer procedures were changed in 2007, partly as a result of his complaints.
The allegations have shocked a country that generally regards itself as an upholder of humanitarian values and intensified scrutiny of Canada's military presence in Afghanistan. Canada has about 2,800 troops based in Kandahar province, who are due to be withdrawn in 2011.
The government has denied the allegations and attacked Colvin's credibility.
"There are incredible holes in the story that have to be examined," the defence minister, Peter MacKay, told parliament yesterday, arguing that Colvin had based his accounts on Taliban propaganda. He rejected opposition calls for a public inquiry.
"It doesn't stand the test of cross-examination. It doesn't stand the test of credibility," MacKay said.
Government attacks on Colvin's credibility have been undermined by its admission that it acted on his complaints about the treatment of detainees in May 2007, a year after he began sending memos. Colvin now holds a senior intelligence post in the Washington embassy.
Colvin said his complaints about the torture of Afghans were "mostly ignored" for a year. After that he was told by government officials to keep quiet and to express his concerns by telephone rather than put them on paper.
He said "the paper trail on detainees" was reduced after the arrival of Arif Lalani, Canada's ambassador in Kabul from May 2007. "Reports on detainees began sometimes to be censored with crucial information removed," he said.
Senior Canadian officials and military officers deny having seen Colvin's dispatches. General Rick Hillier, who commanded Canadian forces in Kandahar in 2006 and has since retired, said: "I don't remember reading a single one of those cables ... He doesn't stick out in my mind."
Hillier rejected the allegation that Canada was complicit in war crimes and compared the uproar to "howling at the moon".
"Even in our own prisons somebody can get beaten up," he said. "We know that."
Gordon O'Connor, Canada's defence minister in 2006 and 2007, suggested yesterday that Colvin's memos might not have travelled all the way up the government hierarchy.
"Reports like this may have occurred and gone through the system and people at lower levels may have decided there's no credibility to different reports," O'Connor said.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.
To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.
News & Opinion
Trending
Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit
Privacy Policy