SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
US Climate Bill Not Likely This Year, says Obama Adviser
Carol Browner's bleak view deepens concerns negotiations will fail to produce meaningful agreement in Copenhagen
Oct 05, 2009
The White House has said for the first time that it does not expect to see a climate change bill this year, removing one of the key elements for reaching an international agreement to avoid catastrophic global warming.
In
a seminar in Washington, Barack Obama's main energy adviser, Carol
Browner, gave the clearest indication to date that the administration
did not expect the Senate to vote on a climate change bill before an
international meeting in Copenhagen in December.
Browner spoke
barely 48 hours after Senate Democrats staged a campaign-style rally in
support of a climate change bill that seeks to cut US emissions by 20%
on 2005 levels by 2020.
"Obviously, we'd like to be through the
process, but that's not going to happen," Browner told a conference
hosted by the Atlantic magazine on Friday. "I think we would all agree
the likelihood that you'd have a bill signed by the president on
comprehensive energy by the time we go in December is not likely."
Browner's
bleak assessment deepens concerns that negotiations, already
deadlocked, will fail to produce a meaningful agreement in Copenhagen.
It also threatens to further dampen the prospects for a bill that was
struggling for support among conservative and rustbelt Democrats.
The
UN has cast the Copenhagen meeting as a last chance for countries to
reach an agreement to avoid the most disastrous effects of warming.
Negotiators - including the state department's climate change envoy -
admit it will be far harder to reach such a deal unless America,
historically the world's biggest polluter, shows it is willing to cut
its own greenhouse gas emissions.
Browner's comments undercut a
campaign by Democratic leaders in the Senate, corporations and
environmental organisations to try to build momentum behind the bill.
The day before Browner's comments, John Kerry, the former presidential
candidate who is one of the sponsors of the cap-and-trade bill, told a
conference he remained confident the bill would squeak through the
Senate.
Her remarks also raise further doubts about how forcefully the Obama administration is willing to press the Senate for a climate bill in the midst of its struggles over healthcare.
In
the last two weeks, diplomats have grown increasingly frustrated with
the administration. Negotiators say they understand Obama would have to
struggle to get this agenda through the Senate, but say the president
has shied away from opportunities to make the case for climate change.
Obama came in for harsh criticism from environmental organisations for failing to urge the Senate to act during a speech to the United Nations summit on climate change late last month. Environmental groups called it a "missed opportunity".
"If
there is no serious US legislation in place then we will have
delegations arriving and getting increasingly frustrated with nothing
happening," said John Bruton, the European Union's ambassador.
An Unconstitutional Rampage
Trump and Musk are on an unconstitutional rampage, aiming for virtually every corner of the federal government. These two right-wing billionaires are targeting nurses, scientists, teachers, daycare providers, judges, veterans, air traffic controllers, and nuclear safety inspectors. No one is safe. The food stamps program, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are next. It’s an unprecedented disaster and a five-alarm fire, but there will be a reckoning. The people did not vote for this. The American people do not want this dystopian hellscape that hides behind claims of “efficiency.” Still, in reality, it is all a giveaway to corporate interests and the libertarian dreams of far-right oligarchs like Musk. Common Dreams is playing a vital role by reporting day and night on this orgy of corruption and greed, as well as what everyday people can do to organize and fight back. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The White House has said for the first time that it does not expect to see a climate change bill this year, removing one of the key elements for reaching an international agreement to avoid catastrophic global warming.
In
a seminar in Washington, Barack Obama's main energy adviser, Carol
Browner, gave the clearest indication to date that the administration
did not expect the Senate to vote on a climate change bill before an
international meeting in Copenhagen in December.
Browner spoke
barely 48 hours after Senate Democrats staged a campaign-style rally in
support of a climate change bill that seeks to cut US emissions by 20%
on 2005 levels by 2020.
"Obviously, we'd like to be through the
process, but that's not going to happen," Browner told a conference
hosted by the Atlantic magazine on Friday. "I think we would all agree
the likelihood that you'd have a bill signed by the president on
comprehensive energy by the time we go in December is not likely."
Browner's
bleak assessment deepens concerns that negotiations, already
deadlocked, will fail to produce a meaningful agreement in Copenhagen.
It also threatens to further dampen the prospects for a bill that was
struggling for support among conservative and rustbelt Democrats.
The
UN has cast the Copenhagen meeting as a last chance for countries to
reach an agreement to avoid the most disastrous effects of warming.
Negotiators - including the state department's climate change envoy -
admit it will be far harder to reach such a deal unless America,
historically the world's biggest polluter, shows it is willing to cut
its own greenhouse gas emissions.
Browner's comments undercut a
campaign by Democratic leaders in the Senate, corporations and
environmental organisations to try to build momentum behind the bill.
The day before Browner's comments, John Kerry, the former presidential
candidate who is one of the sponsors of the cap-and-trade bill, told a
conference he remained confident the bill would squeak through the
Senate.
Her remarks also raise further doubts about how forcefully the Obama administration is willing to press the Senate for a climate bill in the midst of its struggles over healthcare.
In
the last two weeks, diplomats have grown increasingly frustrated with
the administration. Negotiators say they understand Obama would have to
struggle to get this agenda through the Senate, but say the president
has shied away from opportunities to make the case for climate change.
Obama came in for harsh criticism from environmental organisations for failing to urge the Senate to act during a speech to the United Nations summit on climate change late last month. Environmental groups called it a "missed opportunity".
"If
there is no serious US legislation in place then we will have
delegations arriving and getting increasingly frustrated with nothing
happening," said John Bruton, the European Union's ambassador.
The White House has said for the first time that it does not expect to see a climate change bill this year, removing one of the key elements for reaching an international agreement to avoid catastrophic global warming.
In
a seminar in Washington, Barack Obama's main energy adviser, Carol
Browner, gave the clearest indication to date that the administration
did not expect the Senate to vote on a climate change bill before an
international meeting in Copenhagen in December.
Browner spoke
barely 48 hours after Senate Democrats staged a campaign-style rally in
support of a climate change bill that seeks to cut US emissions by 20%
on 2005 levels by 2020.
"Obviously, we'd like to be through the
process, but that's not going to happen," Browner told a conference
hosted by the Atlantic magazine on Friday. "I think we would all agree
the likelihood that you'd have a bill signed by the president on
comprehensive energy by the time we go in December is not likely."
Browner's
bleak assessment deepens concerns that negotiations, already
deadlocked, will fail to produce a meaningful agreement in Copenhagen.
It also threatens to further dampen the prospects for a bill that was
struggling for support among conservative and rustbelt Democrats.
The
UN has cast the Copenhagen meeting as a last chance for countries to
reach an agreement to avoid the most disastrous effects of warming.
Negotiators - including the state department's climate change envoy -
admit it will be far harder to reach such a deal unless America,
historically the world's biggest polluter, shows it is willing to cut
its own greenhouse gas emissions.
Browner's comments undercut a
campaign by Democratic leaders in the Senate, corporations and
environmental organisations to try to build momentum behind the bill.
The day before Browner's comments, John Kerry, the former presidential
candidate who is one of the sponsors of the cap-and-trade bill, told a
conference he remained confident the bill would squeak through the
Senate.
Her remarks also raise further doubts about how forcefully the Obama administration is willing to press the Senate for a climate bill in the midst of its struggles over healthcare.
In
the last two weeks, diplomats have grown increasingly frustrated with
the administration. Negotiators say they understand Obama would have to
struggle to get this agenda through the Senate, but say the president
has shied away from opportunities to make the case for climate change.
Obama came in for harsh criticism from environmental organisations for failing to urge the Senate to act during a speech to the United Nations summit on climate change late last month. Environmental groups called it a "missed opportunity".
"If
there is no serious US legislation in place then we will have
delegations arriving and getting increasingly frustrated with nothing
happening," said John Bruton, the European Union's ambassador.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.