Big Business 'Failing to Disclose Climate Risks' to Investors
Leading companies are offering only minimal information to shareholders on how global warming might affect their bottom line, research shows
The world's major corporations are failing to provide a full account to investors of the risks and potential costs of climate change, a new report said today.
The
report, from the Ceres network of green organisations and investors and
the Environment Defence Fund, found companies offered only minimal
information to their shareholders last year on how global warming might
affect their bottom line..
It arrives at a time when there is growing support among US corporations for a push by Congress to pass the first US law to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Fifty-nine
of the 100 leading global firms surveyed made no mention of greenhouse
gas emissions at all. Twenty eight did not discuss potential risks from
rising sea levels or other aspects of climate change. Fifty-two
provided no information on what steps they are taking to adapt to
climate change.
"These findings are strong evidence that
investors are not getting the infromation they need ... even from
industries facing clear, immediate risks from climate change," the
report said. Only a handful of the companies provided an adequate
account of the potential costs, it found - despite growing demands from
financial regulators to disclose the risks of climate change.
The
study by the Corporate Library analysis firm was based on information
provided by the firms to the US regulatory authority, the Securities
and Exchange Commission, in the first three months of 2008.
The
lack of disclosure was most striking in the insurance industry, the
report found. Despite evidence of the increasing severity of tropical
storms - and the huge spike in claims following Hurricane Katrina in
2005 - 18 of the 27 firms made no mention of climate change or related
risk in their financial disclosure forms.
Twenty-four of
the 27 companies failed to mention any actions taken to address global
warming -- even though the report said they were now opportunities for
insurance policies that factor in climate change.
Oil and
gas companies did not even provide the bare minimum of information on
climate risk, the study found. All but one of the 23 firms surveyed
received only a "poor" or "limited" grade in disclosing climate risks.
Seventeen of the companies gave no information on their emissions or
their positions on climate change. The report singled out Exxon Mobile,
Apache and Anadarko for weak disclosure.
Electricity firms
did only slightly better. Even so, only three of the 26 firms surveyed
gave an adequate assessment of the risks posed by climate change. Two
provided information about their attempts to address climate change.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The world's major corporations are failing to provide a full account to investors of the risks and potential costs of climate change, a new report said today.
The
report, from the Ceres network of green organisations and investors and
the Environment Defence Fund, found companies offered only minimal
information to their shareholders last year on how global warming might
affect their bottom line..
It arrives at a time when there is growing support among US corporations for a push by Congress to pass the first US law to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Fifty-nine
of the 100 leading global firms surveyed made no mention of greenhouse
gas emissions at all. Twenty eight did not discuss potential risks from
rising sea levels or other aspects of climate change. Fifty-two
provided no information on what steps they are taking to adapt to
climate change.
"These findings are strong evidence that
investors are not getting the infromation they need ... even from
industries facing clear, immediate risks from climate change," the
report said. Only a handful of the companies provided an adequate
account of the potential costs, it found - despite growing demands from
financial regulators to disclose the risks of climate change.
The
study by the Corporate Library analysis firm was based on information
provided by the firms to the US regulatory authority, the Securities
and Exchange Commission, in the first three months of 2008.
The
lack of disclosure was most striking in the insurance industry, the
report found. Despite evidence of the increasing severity of tropical
storms - and the huge spike in claims following Hurricane Katrina in
2005 - 18 of the 27 firms made no mention of climate change or related
risk in their financial disclosure forms.
Twenty-four of
the 27 companies failed to mention any actions taken to address global
warming -- even though the report said they were now opportunities for
insurance policies that factor in climate change.
Oil and
gas companies did not even provide the bare minimum of information on
climate risk, the study found. All but one of the 23 firms surveyed
received only a "poor" or "limited" grade in disclosing climate risks.
Seventeen of the companies gave no information on their emissions or
their positions on climate change. The report singled out Exxon Mobile,
Apache and Anadarko for weak disclosure.
Electricity firms
did only slightly better. Even so, only three of the 26 firms surveyed
gave an adequate assessment of the risks posed by climate change. Two
provided information about their attempts to address climate change.
The world's major corporations are failing to provide a full account to investors of the risks and potential costs of climate change, a new report said today.
The
report, from the Ceres network of green organisations and investors and
the Environment Defence Fund, found companies offered only minimal
information to their shareholders last year on how global warming might
affect their bottom line..
It arrives at a time when there is growing support among US corporations for a push by Congress to pass the first US law to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Fifty-nine
of the 100 leading global firms surveyed made no mention of greenhouse
gas emissions at all. Twenty eight did not discuss potential risks from
rising sea levels or other aspects of climate change. Fifty-two
provided no information on what steps they are taking to adapt to
climate change.
"These findings are strong evidence that
investors are not getting the infromation they need ... even from
industries facing clear, immediate risks from climate change," the
report said. Only a handful of the companies provided an adequate
account of the potential costs, it found - despite growing demands from
financial regulators to disclose the risks of climate change.
The
study by the Corporate Library analysis firm was based on information
provided by the firms to the US regulatory authority, the Securities
and Exchange Commission, in the first three months of 2008.
The
lack of disclosure was most striking in the insurance industry, the
report found. Despite evidence of the increasing severity of tropical
storms - and the huge spike in claims following Hurricane Katrina in
2005 - 18 of the 27 firms made no mention of climate change or related
risk in their financial disclosure forms.
Twenty-four of
the 27 companies failed to mention any actions taken to address global
warming -- even though the report said they were now opportunities for
insurance policies that factor in climate change.
Oil and
gas companies did not even provide the bare minimum of information on
climate risk, the study found. All but one of the 23 firms surveyed
received only a "poor" or "limited" grade in disclosing climate risks.
Seventeen of the companies gave no information on their emissions or
their positions on climate change. The report singled out Exxon Mobile,
Apache and Anadarko for weak disclosure.
Electricity firms
did only slightly better. Even so, only three of the 26 firms surveyed
gave an adequate assessment of the risks posed by climate change. Two
provided information about their attempts to address climate change.