SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
How Murdoch Called Obama-Fox Truce
Sep 03, 2008
Rupert Murdoch brokered a "tentative truce" between Barack Obama, the presidential candidate who has won his enthusiastic backing, and the head of Fox News, the influential rightwing network he owns that has regularly pilloried the Democratic nominee, the media mogul's biographer has revealed.
Michael Wolff, a US media commentator who enjoyed unprecedented access to the 77-year-old News Corp chairman, describes in an article for Vanity Fair how Murdoch's meeting with Roger Ailes descended into a furious dispute before resulting in a "tentative truce".
He outlines how Murdoch has enthusiastically courted Obama even though the Democratic candidate repeatedly snubbed his advances, and this despite senior News Corp executives having recruited the Kennedys to act as go-betweens.
This marked a "leap" for the mogul - whose empire stretches from the Sun, the Times and BSkyB in the UK to 20th Century Fox, the New York Post and the Wall Street Journal in the US, and Star TV in Asia - because "Murdoch has traditionally liked politicians to come to him".
Wolff relates that Obama finally relented early in the summer and the pair met with Ailes at the Waldorf-Astoria hotel in New York.
According to Wolff's account, the meeting began cordially, with Obama asking Murdoch about his relationship with his father and his path from a single Adelaide newspaper to global media magnate. In turn, the mogul imparted his view that, having known possibly as many heads of state as anyone living today and met every US president since Harry Truman, nobody had much time to make an impression - "leadership was about what you did in the first six months".
But as Murdoch switched places with Ailes, Obama "lit into" the Fox News man. "He said that he didn't want to waste his time talking to Ailes if Fox was just going to continue to abuse him and his wife, that Fox had relentlessly portrayed him as suspicious, foreign, fearsome - just short of a terrorist," wrote Wolff, who was not present at the meeting but said yesterday his detailed account was correct "to the very best of my knowledge".
"Ailes, unruffled, said it might not have been this way if Obama had more willingly come on the air instead of so often giving Fox the back of his hand. A tentative truce, which may or may not have vast historical significance, was at that moment agreed upon."
"Murdoch is strongly, if not firmly, in the Obama camp. How that plays out on Fox is another question," Wolff said yesterday. "He actually has relatively little ability to affect what's on Fox, assuming he doesn't want to fire Roger Ailes, which I don't think he does. But I do think he would prefer him to be a little less unreconstructed."
The opinion-led US news network became intrinsically linked with the Bush administration and its key pundits have enthusiastically backed John McCain.
In the article, to be published on Friday, Wolff says Murdoch, partly due to the influence of his third wife Wendi, is "becoming a liberal - sort of".
"Fox has been his alter ego. For a long time he was in love with the Fox chief, Roger Ailes, because he was even more Murdoch than Murdoch. And yet now the embarrassment can't be missed - he mumbles even more than usual when called on to justify it; he barely pretends to hide the way he feels about [Fox pundit] Bill O'Reilly. And while it is not possible that he would give Fox up - because the money is the money; success trumps all - in the larger sense of who he is, he seems to want to hedge his bets."
The article, based on almost weekly interviews with Murdoch over a nine-month period, also paints a revealing portrait of Murdoch's love of mischievous gossip, his closeness to his children, his visceral passion for newspapers and his unsated ambition to add to his empire.
Wolff, a Vanity Fair contributing editor who wrote a book about his experience of the dotcom bust before reinventing himself as a media pundit, also believes Murdoch is serious in his ambition to buy the New York Times, the liberal totem that has cast him as "bogeyman and vulgarian".
But when Wolff asks Murdoch in their final interview what he can do to prevent what happened to the Bancrofts, the old Wall Street Journal dynasty, from happening to his family, he throws his hands up in the air and says: "Oh, simple, I can't. All I can do is delay it."
Related: Obama to Appear On O'Reilly Factor.
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. If you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Rupert Murdoch brokered a "tentative truce" between Barack Obama, the presidential candidate who has won his enthusiastic backing, and the head of Fox News, the influential rightwing network he owns that has regularly pilloried the Democratic nominee, the media mogul's biographer has revealed.
Michael Wolff, a US media commentator who enjoyed unprecedented access to the 77-year-old News Corp chairman, describes in an article for Vanity Fair how Murdoch's meeting with Roger Ailes descended into a furious dispute before resulting in a "tentative truce".
He outlines how Murdoch has enthusiastically courted Obama even though the Democratic candidate repeatedly snubbed his advances, and this despite senior News Corp executives having recruited the Kennedys to act as go-betweens.
This marked a "leap" for the mogul - whose empire stretches from the Sun, the Times and BSkyB in the UK to 20th Century Fox, the New York Post and the Wall Street Journal in the US, and Star TV in Asia - because "Murdoch has traditionally liked politicians to come to him".
Wolff relates that Obama finally relented early in the summer and the pair met with Ailes at the Waldorf-Astoria hotel in New York.
According to Wolff's account, the meeting began cordially, with Obama asking Murdoch about his relationship with his father and his path from a single Adelaide newspaper to global media magnate. In turn, the mogul imparted his view that, having known possibly as many heads of state as anyone living today and met every US president since Harry Truman, nobody had much time to make an impression - "leadership was about what you did in the first six months".
But as Murdoch switched places with Ailes, Obama "lit into" the Fox News man. "He said that he didn't want to waste his time talking to Ailes if Fox was just going to continue to abuse him and his wife, that Fox had relentlessly portrayed him as suspicious, foreign, fearsome - just short of a terrorist," wrote Wolff, who was not present at the meeting but said yesterday his detailed account was correct "to the very best of my knowledge".
"Ailes, unruffled, said it might not have been this way if Obama had more willingly come on the air instead of so often giving Fox the back of his hand. A tentative truce, which may or may not have vast historical significance, was at that moment agreed upon."
"Murdoch is strongly, if not firmly, in the Obama camp. How that plays out on Fox is another question," Wolff said yesterday. "He actually has relatively little ability to affect what's on Fox, assuming he doesn't want to fire Roger Ailes, which I don't think he does. But I do think he would prefer him to be a little less unreconstructed."
The opinion-led US news network became intrinsically linked with the Bush administration and its key pundits have enthusiastically backed John McCain.
In the article, to be published on Friday, Wolff says Murdoch, partly due to the influence of his third wife Wendi, is "becoming a liberal - sort of".
"Fox has been his alter ego. For a long time he was in love with the Fox chief, Roger Ailes, because he was even more Murdoch than Murdoch. And yet now the embarrassment can't be missed - he mumbles even more than usual when called on to justify it; he barely pretends to hide the way he feels about [Fox pundit] Bill O'Reilly. And while it is not possible that he would give Fox up - because the money is the money; success trumps all - in the larger sense of who he is, he seems to want to hedge his bets."
The article, based on almost weekly interviews with Murdoch over a nine-month period, also paints a revealing portrait of Murdoch's love of mischievous gossip, his closeness to his children, his visceral passion for newspapers and his unsated ambition to add to his empire.
Wolff, a Vanity Fair contributing editor who wrote a book about his experience of the dotcom bust before reinventing himself as a media pundit, also believes Murdoch is serious in his ambition to buy the New York Times, the liberal totem that has cast him as "bogeyman and vulgarian".
But when Wolff asks Murdoch in their final interview what he can do to prevent what happened to the Bancrofts, the old Wall Street Journal dynasty, from happening to his family, he throws his hands up in the air and says: "Oh, simple, I can't. All I can do is delay it."
Related: Obama to Appear On O'Reilly Factor.
Rupert Murdoch brokered a "tentative truce" between Barack Obama, the presidential candidate who has won his enthusiastic backing, and the head of Fox News, the influential rightwing network he owns that has regularly pilloried the Democratic nominee, the media mogul's biographer has revealed.
Michael Wolff, a US media commentator who enjoyed unprecedented access to the 77-year-old News Corp chairman, describes in an article for Vanity Fair how Murdoch's meeting with Roger Ailes descended into a furious dispute before resulting in a "tentative truce".
He outlines how Murdoch has enthusiastically courted Obama even though the Democratic candidate repeatedly snubbed his advances, and this despite senior News Corp executives having recruited the Kennedys to act as go-betweens.
This marked a "leap" for the mogul - whose empire stretches from the Sun, the Times and BSkyB in the UK to 20th Century Fox, the New York Post and the Wall Street Journal in the US, and Star TV in Asia - because "Murdoch has traditionally liked politicians to come to him".
Wolff relates that Obama finally relented early in the summer and the pair met with Ailes at the Waldorf-Astoria hotel in New York.
According to Wolff's account, the meeting began cordially, with Obama asking Murdoch about his relationship with his father and his path from a single Adelaide newspaper to global media magnate. In turn, the mogul imparted his view that, having known possibly as many heads of state as anyone living today and met every US president since Harry Truman, nobody had much time to make an impression - "leadership was about what you did in the first six months".
But as Murdoch switched places with Ailes, Obama "lit into" the Fox News man. "He said that he didn't want to waste his time talking to Ailes if Fox was just going to continue to abuse him and his wife, that Fox had relentlessly portrayed him as suspicious, foreign, fearsome - just short of a terrorist," wrote Wolff, who was not present at the meeting but said yesterday his detailed account was correct "to the very best of my knowledge".
"Ailes, unruffled, said it might not have been this way if Obama had more willingly come on the air instead of so often giving Fox the back of his hand. A tentative truce, which may or may not have vast historical significance, was at that moment agreed upon."
"Murdoch is strongly, if not firmly, in the Obama camp. How that plays out on Fox is another question," Wolff said yesterday. "He actually has relatively little ability to affect what's on Fox, assuming he doesn't want to fire Roger Ailes, which I don't think he does. But I do think he would prefer him to be a little less unreconstructed."
The opinion-led US news network became intrinsically linked with the Bush administration and its key pundits have enthusiastically backed John McCain.
In the article, to be published on Friday, Wolff says Murdoch, partly due to the influence of his third wife Wendi, is "becoming a liberal - sort of".
"Fox has been his alter ego. For a long time he was in love with the Fox chief, Roger Ailes, because he was even more Murdoch than Murdoch. And yet now the embarrassment can't be missed - he mumbles even more than usual when called on to justify it; he barely pretends to hide the way he feels about [Fox pundit] Bill O'Reilly. And while it is not possible that he would give Fox up - because the money is the money; success trumps all - in the larger sense of who he is, he seems to want to hedge his bets."
The article, based on almost weekly interviews with Murdoch over a nine-month period, also paints a revealing portrait of Murdoch's love of mischievous gossip, his closeness to his children, his visceral passion for newspapers and his unsated ambition to add to his empire.
Wolff, a Vanity Fair contributing editor who wrote a book about his experience of the dotcom bust before reinventing himself as a media pundit, also believes Murdoch is serious in his ambition to buy the New York Times, the liberal totem that has cast him as "bogeyman and vulgarian".
But when Wolff asks Murdoch in their final interview what he can do to prevent what happened to the Bancrofts, the old Wall Street Journal dynasty, from happening to his family, he throws his hands up in the air and says: "Oh, simple, I can't. All I can do is delay it."
Related: Obama to Appear On O'Reilly Factor.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.
To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.
News & Opinion
Trending
Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit
Privacy Policy