SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Goodall Urges Nobel Prize for Sparing Lab Animals
May 28, 2008
The primatologist Dr Jane Goodall will today propose that a Nobel prize be set up for advancing medical knowledge without experimentation on animals. The scientist, who pioneered research on chimpanzees in the wild, says moving away from animal research is a "goal towards which all civilised nations should be moving".
She will speak at an event organised by animal rights groups and MEPs to put pressure on the European commission to review directive 86/609, which governs animal research across the EU.
"As we move into the 21st century we need a new mind-set," she said. "We should admit that the infliction of suffering on beings who are capable of feeling is ethically problematic and that the amazing human brain should set to work to find new ways of testing and experimenting that will not involve the use of live, sentient beings.
"The scientific establishment should actively encourage such research. More funding should be made available for it. And rewards - such as a Nobel prize - should be given for it."
She will also advocate a centre of excellence to develop alternatives to animal research. About 12m animals were used in experiments in 2005. The vast majority were mice and rats.
Goodall's suggestion of a Nobel prize looks unlikely to succeed. Only one has been added - the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economics in 1968 - since the scientific accolades were first awarded in 1901. About 15 years ago the former US vice-president Al Gore approached the Nobel Foundation to suggest an award for contributions to environmentalism. Michael Sohlman, president of the foundation, said the organisation politely turned him down. Adding a prize for alternatives to animal testing was "out of the question", Sohlman said.
Scientists argue that research using animals has contributed to advances in many fields including antibiotics, anaesthetics, vaccines, insulin for diabetes, open heart surgery, kidney dialysis and transplants. They say that animal research is highly regulated in the UK, with both the lab where research is carried out and the specific project needing a licence from the Home Office. They also point out that the high cost of animal testing is a strong incentive for researchers to use alternatives where possible.
But Green MEP Caroline Lucas said alternatives were not being developed fast enough. "What we want to see in there very clearly is a strategy that will move us away from animal experiments and include more up to date, effective alternatives," she said, "What we need is far more resources put into developing them and getting them on to the market."
(c) 2008 The Guardian
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The primatologist Dr Jane Goodall will today propose that a Nobel prize be set up for advancing medical knowledge without experimentation on animals. The scientist, who pioneered research on chimpanzees in the wild, says moving away from animal research is a "goal towards which all civilised nations should be moving".
She will speak at an event organised by animal rights groups and MEPs to put pressure on the European commission to review directive 86/609, which governs animal research across the EU.
"As we move into the 21st century we need a new mind-set," she said. "We should admit that the infliction of suffering on beings who are capable of feeling is ethically problematic and that the amazing human brain should set to work to find new ways of testing and experimenting that will not involve the use of live, sentient beings.
"The scientific establishment should actively encourage such research. More funding should be made available for it. And rewards - such as a Nobel prize - should be given for it."
She will also advocate a centre of excellence to develop alternatives to animal research. About 12m animals were used in experiments in 2005. The vast majority were mice and rats.
Goodall's suggestion of a Nobel prize looks unlikely to succeed. Only one has been added - the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economics in 1968 - since the scientific accolades were first awarded in 1901. About 15 years ago the former US vice-president Al Gore approached the Nobel Foundation to suggest an award for contributions to environmentalism. Michael Sohlman, president of the foundation, said the organisation politely turned him down. Adding a prize for alternatives to animal testing was "out of the question", Sohlman said.
Scientists argue that research using animals has contributed to advances in many fields including antibiotics, anaesthetics, vaccines, insulin for diabetes, open heart surgery, kidney dialysis and transplants. They say that animal research is highly regulated in the UK, with both the lab where research is carried out and the specific project needing a licence from the Home Office. They also point out that the high cost of animal testing is a strong incentive for researchers to use alternatives where possible.
But Green MEP Caroline Lucas said alternatives were not being developed fast enough. "What we want to see in there very clearly is a strategy that will move us away from animal experiments and include more up to date, effective alternatives," she said, "What we need is far more resources put into developing them and getting them on to the market."
(c) 2008 The Guardian
The primatologist Dr Jane Goodall will today propose that a Nobel prize be set up for advancing medical knowledge without experimentation on animals. The scientist, who pioneered research on chimpanzees in the wild, says moving away from animal research is a "goal towards which all civilised nations should be moving".
She will speak at an event organised by animal rights groups and MEPs to put pressure on the European commission to review directive 86/609, which governs animal research across the EU.
"As we move into the 21st century we need a new mind-set," she said. "We should admit that the infliction of suffering on beings who are capable of feeling is ethically problematic and that the amazing human brain should set to work to find new ways of testing and experimenting that will not involve the use of live, sentient beings.
"The scientific establishment should actively encourage such research. More funding should be made available for it. And rewards - such as a Nobel prize - should be given for it."
She will also advocate a centre of excellence to develop alternatives to animal research. About 12m animals were used in experiments in 2005. The vast majority were mice and rats.
Goodall's suggestion of a Nobel prize looks unlikely to succeed. Only one has been added - the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economics in 1968 - since the scientific accolades were first awarded in 1901. About 15 years ago the former US vice-president Al Gore approached the Nobel Foundation to suggest an award for contributions to environmentalism. Michael Sohlman, president of the foundation, said the organisation politely turned him down. Adding a prize for alternatives to animal testing was "out of the question", Sohlman said.
Scientists argue that research using animals has contributed to advances in many fields including antibiotics, anaesthetics, vaccines, insulin for diabetes, open heart surgery, kidney dialysis and transplants. They say that animal research is highly regulated in the UK, with both the lab where research is carried out and the specific project needing a licence from the Home Office. They also point out that the high cost of animal testing is a strong incentive for researchers to use alternatives where possible.
But Green MEP Caroline Lucas said alternatives were not being developed fast enough. "What we want to see in there very clearly is a strategy that will move us away from animal experiments and include more up to date, effective alternatives," she said, "What we need is far more resources put into developing them and getting them on to the market."
(c) 2008 The Guardian
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.