"Donald Trump, having backed the losing (and objectionable) candidate in Alabama's senate race, suddenly wants to cooperate with Democrats on infrastructure spending," Cole writes. (Photo: @nickiknowsnada/Twitter)
Dec 24, 2017
Donald Trump, having backed the losing (and objectionable) candidate in Alabama's senate race, suddenly wants to cooperate with Democrats on infrastructure spending.
\u201cAt some point, and for the good of the country, I predict we will start working with the Democrats in a Bipartisan fashion. Infrastructure would be a perfect place to start. After having foolishly spent $7 trillion in the Middle East, it is time to start rebuilding our country!\u201d— Donald J. Trump (@Donald J. Trump) 1513947906
Trump continues to amaze with his self-contradictory boosterism. Here he posed as someone who minded the expense of war, and who is rolling up his shirt sleeves to collaborate with Democrats so as to pass a bill on spending on infrastructure.
So if he is so concerned about wasted money in the Mideast, here's what he could do to stop the hemorrhaging of Federal money:
Stop rushing headlong into war with Iran.
Iran is 2.5 times bigger than Iraq with regard to population, and much bigger in its geographical extent.
The Obama administration made peace with Iran. The nuclear deal or JCPOA closed off all four major plausible paths to a nuclear weapon for that country. Iran had to submit to frequent UN inspections.
The Iran deal is what keeps the US from going to war with Iran.
Ever since Trump began running for office he has been trying to find a way to sabotage that deal.
Nikki Haley, for instance. A bully and a liar, she keeps saying that Iran has broken the deal.
It has not.
She says they are working on missiles. Maybe. Missiles aren't in the deal.
And, if the deal holds, Iran has nothing of significance to put on the missiles.
Haley did a grandstanding news conference about Iran-made missiles fired by Yemen's Houthis toward Saudi Arabia.
That's bad.
She said nothing about the intensive daily Saudi bombardment of civilians in Sanaa with US planes and bombs.
That's worse.
A war with Iran would cost much more than $7 trillion, by the time you counted up the cost of bombs, and airplanes, and tanks and artillery and armored vehicles, but above all of treating all the veterans who will be wounded, it will be many trillions.
Trump says he wants Iran out of Syria from one side of his mouth, then from the other he praises Putin's role there. Hint: Putin mainly has his Air Force in Syria. Those planes would be worthless in fighting guerrillas without ground troops who can take and hold territory.
Iran oversees the supply of militiamen from Lebanon and Iraq to the Syrian regime.
So you can't say you'll let Putin have Syria and also complain about Iran's role there; they are allies.
Which is it?
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
© 2023 Juan Cole
Juan Cole
Juan Cole teaches Middle Eastern and South Asian history at the University of Michigan. His newest book, "Muhammad: Prophet of Peace Amid the Clash of Empires" was published in 2020. He is also the author of "The New Arabs: How the Millennial Generation Is Changing the Middle East" (2015) and "Napoleon's Egypt: Invading the Middle East" (2008). He has appeared widely on television, radio, and on op-ed pages as a commentator on Middle East affairs, and has a regular column at Salon.com. He has written, edited, or translated 14 books and has authored 60 journal articles.
Donald Trump, having backed the losing (and objectionable) candidate in Alabama's senate race, suddenly wants to cooperate with Democrats on infrastructure spending.
\u201cAt some point, and for the good of the country, I predict we will start working with the Democrats in a Bipartisan fashion. Infrastructure would be a perfect place to start. After having foolishly spent $7 trillion in the Middle East, it is time to start rebuilding our country!\u201d— Donald J. Trump (@Donald J. Trump) 1513947906
Trump continues to amaze with his self-contradictory boosterism. Here he posed as someone who minded the expense of war, and who is rolling up his shirt sleeves to collaborate with Democrats so as to pass a bill on spending on infrastructure.
So if he is so concerned about wasted money in the Mideast, here's what he could do to stop the hemorrhaging of Federal money:
Stop rushing headlong into war with Iran.
Iran is 2.5 times bigger than Iraq with regard to population, and much bigger in its geographical extent.
The Obama administration made peace with Iran. The nuclear deal or JCPOA closed off all four major plausible paths to a nuclear weapon for that country. Iran had to submit to frequent UN inspections.
The Iran deal is what keeps the US from going to war with Iran.
Ever since Trump began running for office he has been trying to find a way to sabotage that deal.
Nikki Haley, for instance. A bully and a liar, she keeps saying that Iran has broken the deal.
It has not.
She says they are working on missiles. Maybe. Missiles aren't in the deal.
And, if the deal holds, Iran has nothing of significance to put on the missiles.
Haley did a grandstanding news conference about Iran-made missiles fired by Yemen's Houthis toward Saudi Arabia.
That's bad.
She said nothing about the intensive daily Saudi bombardment of civilians in Sanaa with US planes and bombs.
That's worse.
A war with Iran would cost much more than $7 trillion, by the time you counted up the cost of bombs, and airplanes, and tanks and artillery and armored vehicles, but above all of treating all the veterans who will be wounded, it will be many trillions.
Trump says he wants Iran out of Syria from one side of his mouth, then from the other he praises Putin's role there. Hint: Putin mainly has his Air Force in Syria. Those planes would be worthless in fighting guerrillas without ground troops who can take and hold territory.
Iran oversees the supply of militiamen from Lebanon and Iraq to the Syrian regime.
So you can't say you'll let Putin have Syria and also complain about Iran's role there; they are allies.
Which is it?
Juan Cole
Juan Cole teaches Middle Eastern and South Asian history at the University of Michigan. His newest book, "Muhammad: Prophet of Peace Amid the Clash of Empires" was published in 2020. He is also the author of "The New Arabs: How the Millennial Generation Is Changing the Middle East" (2015) and "Napoleon's Egypt: Invading the Middle East" (2008). He has appeared widely on television, radio, and on op-ed pages as a commentator on Middle East affairs, and has a regular column at Salon.com. He has written, edited, or translated 14 books and has authored 60 journal articles.
Donald Trump, having backed the losing (and objectionable) candidate in Alabama's senate race, suddenly wants to cooperate with Democrats on infrastructure spending.
\u201cAt some point, and for the good of the country, I predict we will start working with the Democrats in a Bipartisan fashion. Infrastructure would be a perfect place to start. After having foolishly spent $7 trillion in the Middle East, it is time to start rebuilding our country!\u201d— Donald J. Trump (@Donald J. Trump) 1513947906
Trump continues to amaze with his self-contradictory boosterism. Here he posed as someone who minded the expense of war, and who is rolling up his shirt sleeves to collaborate with Democrats so as to pass a bill on spending on infrastructure.
So if he is so concerned about wasted money in the Mideast, here's what he could do to stop the hemorrhaging of Federal money:
Stop rushing headlong into war with Iran.
Iran is 2.5 times bigger than Iraq with regard to population, and much bigger in its geographical extent.
The Obama administration made peace with Iran. The nuclear deal or JCPOA closed off all four major plausible paths to a nuclear weapon for that country. Iran had to submit to frequent UN inspections.
The Iran deal is what keeps the US from going to war with Iran.
Ever since Trump began running for office he has been trying to find a way to sabotage that deal.
Nikki Haley, for instance. A bully and a liar, she keeps saying that Iran has broken the deal.
It has not.
She says they are working on missiles. Maybe. Missiles aren't in the deal.
And, if the deal holds, Iran has nothing of significance to put on the missiles.
Haley did a grandstanding news conference about Iran-made missiles fired by Yemen's Houthis toward Saudi Arabia.
That's bad.
She said nothing about the intensive daily Saudi bombardment of civilians in Sanaa with US planes and bombs.
That's worse.
A war with Iran would cost much more than $7 trillion, by the time you counted up the cost of bombs, and airplanes, and tanks and artillery and armored vehicles, but above all of treating all the veterans who will be wounded, it will be many trillions.
Trump says he wants Iran out of Syria from one side of his mouth, then from the other he praises Putin's role there. Hint: Putin mainly has his Air Force in Syria. Those planes would be worthless in fighting guerrillas without ground troops who can take and hold territory.
Iran oversees the supply of militiamen from Lebanon and Iraq to the Syrian regime.
So you can't say you'll let Putin have Syria and also complain about Iran's role there; they are allies.
Which is it?
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.