

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
In 1985, Neil Postman's book
Amusing Ourselves To Death was published. His thesis, in brief,
is that television and the media culture have replaced thoughtfulness
with entertainment. We are being converted from a critically minded
inquisitive population enjoying informed discourse to a nation of
passive
retards.
In 1985, Neil Postman's book
Amusing Ourselves To Death was published. His thesis, in brief,
is that television and the media culture have replaced thoughtfulness
with entertainment. We are being converted from a critically minded
inquisitive population enjoying informed discourse to a nation of
passive
retards.
Yesterday, May 26, 2010, the
Yahoo! news headline was "BP plans a 'Top Kill.'" Prior
to going to my home page I had been reading Henry Miller's The
Air-Conditioned Nightmare (first published in 1945). Passages
such as this:
"This world which is
in the making fills me with dread. I have seen it germinate; I can read it like a blue-print. It is not a world I want to live
in. It is a world suited for monomaniacs [BP, my insert] obsessed
with the idea of progress -- but a false progress, a progress which
stinks. It is a world cluttered with useless objects which men
and women, in order to be exploited and degraded, are taught to regard
as useful."
I go from a passage like the
above to the headline. "Kill?" "Top Kill?" Is BP
hunting terrorists now, I wonder. Battered with too many Jason
Bourne movies, living in the surround sound of Jack Bauer on
television's
"24 Hours," I am titillated to explore what is the nature of this
"Top Kill." I click on the link. No, it's not Osama
Bin Laden. It's an oil leak. BP's very own oil leak.
The weapon of choice is mud. "The company will shoot high-pressure
mud into the well, hoping the pressure of mud coming in will eventually
overcome the pressure of oil shooting out."
I am struck by the language.
What BP is intent upon "killing" is the very "lifeblood" of
our civilization. Oil's roots, hydrogen and carbon, are the
basis of all earthly life. Carbon fuels currently empower our
civilization. Using terminology of execution to describe a strategy
for containing a 'livelihood leak' is peculiar indeed. What concerns
is the language, the ecology of the language. Are we not able
to catch the semantic overtones of "shooting mud?" Mud slinging?
Mud in the face? Mud being slung in the face of the BP executives?
Language usage describing this
contamination event is very revealing. Is a language contamination
also operative? Is language being endangered? As "the
limitations in our language is the limitations in our world,"
(Wittgenstein),
we have a lot to be wary of. A lot to protect. When we speak
of 'killing' that which sustains us are we not revealing something
very perverse about ourselves? To be sustained by that which hazards
our health and our air, to that which has the capacity to devastate
wetlands and wildlife, to that which when corrupted (leaks) corrupts,
-- is this not corruptible?
Alternatively, one could have
used expressions such as "get control of" the leak, "contain,"
"redirect," "repair," "regulate," "salvage," "stop,"
"reverse," ... but "Kill?" And a "Top Kill" at that.
"Kill" is also used to
express annihilating time. "It killed time." "It killed
the weekend." What bizarre commentary this is. A nation
obsessed with longevity hell bent on "killing time?" Wow,
we really beat the shit out of "Time."
I want to suggest a Language
Leak. Here's Henry Miller:
"Tell
me what it is that man can build, to protect himself, which other men
cannot destroy? What are we trying to defend? Only what
is old, useless, dead, indefensible. Every defense is a provocation
to assault. Why not surrender? Why not give -- give all?"
(from The Air-Conditioned Nightmare)
We won't surrender because
we're in peak conditioning. We're in the Oil-Conditioned Nightmare
-- enslaved to our cars, our blackberries, our cell phones, our kindles,
our powerbooks & computers, our itunes and apps, our televisions
& treadmills. We're a nation of Reactivity rather than
Investigation
and Reflection. A nation assaulting our environment. As
the wetlands are being overcome with suffocating ooze, so our mental
capacities are being smothered, shut down, diminished. Our interior
landscape is vanishing. We're experiencing a perpetual leak,
a prolonged erosion of our life sources, our domain of external and
internal habitat. We buy and sell, we kill and defend, we update
and install, we click and click ... our horizons are shrinking -- it
is the Time of Shrivellization.
Let this Leakage be a wake-up call, a last ditch alert -- if it's
not too late already -- to look to new methods to nurture and fuel,
to provide, to sustain ourselves. Let us seek out the subtle and
the tenebrous, the non-palpable and invisible, the slight and the
insignificant.
Let us seek to use language more richly, with more consideration, with
more tenderness, with more understanding, with more -- embrace.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
In 1985, Neil Postman's book
Amusing Ourselves To Death was published. His thesis, in brief,
is that television and the media culture have replaced thoughtfulness
with entertainment. We are being converted from a critically minded
inquisitive population enjoying informed discourse to a nation of
passive
retards.
Yesterday, May 26, 2010, the
Yahoo! news headline was "BP plans a 'Top Kill.'" Prior
to going to my home page I had been reading Henry Miller's The
Air-Conditioned Nightmare (first published in 1945). Passages
such as this:
"This world which is
in the making fills me with dread. I have seen it germinate; I can read it like a blue-print. It is not a world I want to live
in. It is a world suited for monomaniacs [BP, my insert] obsessed
with the idea of progress -- but a false progress, a progress which
stinks. It is a world cluttered with useless objects which men
and women, in order to be exploited and degraded, are taught to regard
as useful."
I go from a passage like the
above to the headline. "Kill?" "Top Kill?" Is BP
hunting terrorists now, I wonder. Battered with too many Jason
Bourne movies, living in the surround sound of Jack Bauer on
television's
"24 Hours," I am titillated to explore what is the nature of this
"Top Kill." I click on the link. No, it's not Osama
Bin Laden. It's an oil leak. BP's very own oil leak.
The weapon of choice is mud. "The company will shoot high-pressure
mud into the well, hoping the pressure of mud coming in will eventually
overcome the pressure of oil shooting out."
I am struck by the language.
What BP is intent upon "killing" is the very "lifeblood" of
our civilization. Oil's roots, hydrogen and carbon, are the
basis of all earthly life. Carbon fuels currently empower our
civilization. Using terminology of execution to describe a strategy
for containing a 'livelihood leak' is peculiar indeed. What concerns
is the language, the ecology of the language. Are we not able
to catch the semantic overtones of "shooting mud?" Mud slinging?
Mud in the face? Mud being slung in the face of the BP executives?
Language usage describing this
contamination event is very revealing. Is a language contamination
also operative? Is language being endangered? As "the
limitations in our language is the limitations in our world,"
(Wittgenstein),
we have a lot to be wary of. A lot to protect. When we speak
of 'killing' that which sustains us are we not revealing something
very perverse about ourselves? To be sustained by that which hazards
our health and our air, to that which has the capacity to devastate
wetlands and wildlife, to that which when corrupted (leaks) corrupts,
-- is this not corruptible?
Alternatively, one could have
used expressions such as "get control of" the leak, "contain,"
"redirect," "repair," "regulate," "salvage," "stop,"
"reverse," ... but "Kill?" And a "Top Kill" at that.
"Kill" is also used to
express annihilating time. "It killed time." "It killed
the weekend." What bizarre commentary this is. A nation
obsessed with longevity hell bent on "killing time?" Wow,
we really beat the shit out of "Time."
I want to suggest a Language
Leak. Here's Henry Miller:
"Tell
me what it is that man can build, to protect himself, which other men
cannot destroy? What are we trying to defend? Only what
is old, useless, dead, indefensible. Every defense is a provocation
to assault. Why not surrender? Why not give -- give all?"
(from The Air-Conditioned Nightmare)
We won't surrender because
we're in peak conditioning. We're in the Oil-Conditioned Nightmare
-- enslaved to our cars, our blackberries, our cell phones, our kindles,
our powerbooks & computers, our itunes and apps, our televisions
& treadmills. We're a nation of Reactivity rather than
Investigation
and Reflection. A nation assaulting our environment. As
the wetlands are being overcome with suffocating ooze, so our mental
capacities are being smothered, shut down, diminished. Our interior
landscape is vanishing. We're experiencing a perpetual leak,
a prolonged erosion of our life sources, our domain of external and
internal habitat. We buy and sell, we kill and defend, we update
and install, we click and click ... our horizons are shrinking -- it
is the Time of Shrivellization.
Let this Leakage be a wake-up call, a last ditch alert -- if it's
not too late already -- to look to new methods to nurture and fuel,
to provide, to sustain ourselves. Let us seek out the subtle and
the tenebrous, the non-palpable and invisible, the slight and the
insignificant.
Let us seek to use language more richly, with more consideration, with
more tenderness, with more understanding, with more -- embrace.
In 1985, Neil Postman's book
Amusing Ourselves To Death was published. His thesis, in brief,
is that television and the media culture have replaced thoughtfulness
with entertainment. We are being converted from a critically minded
inquisitive population enjoying informed discourse to a nation of
passive
retards.
Yesterday, May 26, 2010, the
Yahoo! news headline was "BP plans a 'Top Kill.'" Prior
to going to my home page I had been reading Henry Miller's The
Air-Conditioned Nightmare (first published in 1945). Passages
such as this:
"This world which is
in the making fills me with dread. I have seen it germinate; I can read it like a blue-print. It is not a world I want to live
in. It is a world suited for monomaniacs [BP, my insert] obsessed
with the idea of progress -- but a false progress, a progress which
stinks. It is a world cluttered with useless objects which men
and women, in order to be exploited and degraded, are taught to regard
as useful."
I go from a passage like the
above to the headline. "Kill?" "Top Kill?" Is BP
hunting terrorists now, I wonder. Battered with too many Jason
Bourne movies, living in the surround sound of Jack Bauer on
television's
"24 Hours," I am titillated to explore what is the nature of this
"Top Kill." I click on the link. No, it's not Osama
Bin Laden. It's an oil leak. BP's very own oil leak.
The weapon of choice is mud. "The company will shoot high-pressure
mud into the well, hoping the pressure of mud coming in will eventually
overcome the pressure of oil shooting out."
I am struck by the language.
What BP is intent upon "killing" is the very "lifeblood" of
our civilization. Oil's roots, hydrogen and carbon, are the
basis of all earthly life. Carbon fuels currently empower our
civilization. Using terminology of execution to describe a strategy
for containing a 'livelihood leak' is peculiar indeed. What concerns
is the language, the ecology of the language. Are we not able
to catch the semantic overtones of "shooting mud?" Mud slinging?
Mud in the face? Mud being slung in the face of the BP executives?
Language usage describing this
contamination event is very revealing. Is a language contamination
also operative? Is language being endangered? As "the
limitations in our language is the limitations in our world,"
(Wittgenstein),
we have a lot to be wary of. A lot to protect. When we speak
of 'killing' that which sustains us are we not revealing something
very perverse about ourselves? To be sustained by that which hazards
our health and our air, to that which has the capacity to devastate
wetlands and wildlife, to that which when corrupted (leaks) corrupts,
-- is this not corruptible?
Alternatively, one could have
used expressions such as "get control of" the leak, "contain,"
"redirect," "repair," "regulate," "salvage," "stop,"
"reverse," ... but "Kill?" And a "Top Kill" at that.
"Kill" is also used to
express annihilating time. "It killed time." "It killed
the weekend." What bizarre commentary this is. A nation
obsessed with longevity hell bent on "killing time?" Wow,
we really beat the shit out of "Time."
I want to suggest a Language
Leak. Here's Henry Miller:
"Tell
me what it is that man can build, to protect himself, which other men
cannot destroy? What are we trying to defend? Only what
is old, useless, dead, indefensible. Every defense is a provocation
to assault. Why not surrender? Why not give -- give all?"
(from The Air-Conditioned Nightmare)
We won't surrender because
we're in peak conditioning. We're in the Oil-Conditioned Nightmare
-- enslaved to our cars, our blackberries, our cell phones, our kindles,
our powerbooks & computers, our itunes and apps, our televisions
& treadmills. We're a nation of Reactivity rather than
Investigation
and Reflection. A nation assaulting our environment. As
the wetlands are being overcome with suffocating ooze, so our mental
capacities are being smothered, shut down, diminished. Our interior
landscape is vanishing. We're experiencing a perpetual leak,
a prolonged erosion of our life sources, our domain of external and
internal habitat. We buy and sell, we kill and defend, we update
and install, we click and click ... our horizons are shrinking -- it
is the Time of Shrivellization.
Let this Leakage be a wake-up call, a last ditch alert -- if it's
not too late already -- to look to new methods to nurture and fuel,
to provide, to sustain ourselves. Let us seek out the subtle and
the tenebrous, the non-palpable and invisible, the slight and the
insignificant.
Let us seek to use language more richly, with more consideration, with
more tenderness, with more understanding, with more -- embrace.