Critics Decry Surveillance of Canadian Journalist as Part of 'Horrifying' Culture Shift
"The new powers that the police have to survey Canadians are absolutely horrifying, they're basically limitless, there's very little oversight"
Canadian free speech advocates slammed recent revelations that Montreal police tracked a journalist's cell phone calls, text messages, and locations in an attempt to identify one of his sources, who was leaking details of an internal police investigation.
La Presse columnist Patrick Lagace, the target in the case, called the move "indefensible," stating in an interview on Monday that the approval of a warrant to spy on a journalist was "incredibly aggressive."
"To me, this was a great pretext to try to investigate a reporter who has done numerous stories in the past that have embarrassed the service," he said. "This is a big thing in a country like Canada. Police were permitted to spy on a journalist under very, very thin motives on a secondary part of a criminal investigation."
Supporters of press freedom in Canada said it is part of a worrying "culture shift" brought about by the so-called anti-terror bill approved by Parliament last year, which gave extraordinary new powers to law enforcement agencies, including their ability to spy on civilians.
Tom Henheffer, executive director of Canadian Journalists for Free Expression, told CBC News, "The new powers that the police have to survey Canadians are absolutely horrifying, they're basically limitless, there's very little oversight, and when that happens the system will be ripe for abuse, and this is just an example of how it's abused."
"What's even more worrying about it is the fact that this is a justice of the peace who actually authorized this," he said.
Police reportedly monitored Lagace's iPhone for several months this year in order to find out the identity of his sources, apparently as part of an investigation into a crime that occurred within the police force. The probe was called Projet Escouade, and involved charges of fabricated evidence by officers involved in street gangs and drug trafficking operations. One of the officers being investigated apparently contacted Lagace.
At least 24 surveillance warrants were issued that allowed police to track incoming and outgoing calls on Lagace's phone, as well as its location, although Police Chief Philippe Pichet denied that Lagace's GPS was being monitored.
Mark Bantey, a media lawyer, told CBC News that the revelations were "shocking."
"I was stunned because the police obviously took the very drastic measures to obtain the source of information. I think it's shocking actually. I think it's a serious attack on freedom of the press in Canada," Bantey said. "I have never seen anything like this in the 35 years I have been practicing media law. It is unprecedented. The police have issued search warrants against media outlets in the past, but nothing as far-ranging as this one."
Henheffer also noted that Lagace's case is only the latest in which a journalist was targeted by police for information, pointing to an incident in September when Quebec provincial police seized Journal de Montreal reporter Michael Nguyen's computer because they believed he had illegally obtained information for a story.
And Stephane Giroux, a spokesperson for the Quebec journalists federation, told CBC that the scandal could chill free speech and discourage sources from reaching out to reporters.
"If they can do it to Patrick Lagace, they can do it to anyone," he said.
Pichet claimed that "all regulations were followed" in the operation of spying on a journalist's phone.
FINAL DAY! This is urgent.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just hours left in our Spring Campaign, we're still falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Canadian free speech advocates slammed recent revelations that Montreal police tracked a journalist's cell phone calls, text messages, and locations in an attempt to identify one of his sources, who was leaking details of an internal police investigation.
La Presse columnist Patrick Lagace, the target in the case, called the move "indefensible," stating in an interview on Monday that the approval of a warrant to spy on a journalist was "incredibly aggressive."
"To me, this was a great pretext to try to investigate a reporter who has done numerous stories in the past that have embarrassed the service," he said. "This is a big thing in a country like Canada. Police were permitted to spy on a journalist under very, very thin motives on a secondary part of a criminal investigation."
Supporters of press freedom in Canada said it is part of a worrying "culture shift" brought about by the so-called anti-terror bill approved by Parliament last year, which gave extraordinary new powers to law enforcement agencies, including their ability to spy on civilians.
Tom Henheffer, executive director of Canadian Journalists for Free Expression, told CBC News, "The new powers that the police have to survey Canadians are absolutely horrifying, they're basically limitless, there's very little oversight, and when that happens the system will be ripe for abuse, and this is just an example of how it's abused."
"What's even more worrying about it is the fact that this is a justice of the peace who actually authorized this," he said.
Police reportedly monitored Lagace's iPhone for several months this year in order to find out the identity of his sources, apparently as part of an investigation into a crime that occurred within the police force. The probe was called Projet Escouade, and involved charges of fabricated evidence by officers involved in street gangs and drug trafficking operations. One of the officers being investigated apparently contacted Lagace.
At least 24 surveillance warrants were issued that allowed police to track incoming and outgoing calls on Lagace's phone, as well as its location, although Police Chief Philippe Pichet denied that Lagace's GPS was being monitored.
Mark Bantey, a media lawyer, told CBC News that the revelations were "shocking."
"I was stunned because the police obviously took the very drastic measures to obtain the source of information. I think it's shocking actually. I think it's a serious attack on freedom of the press in Canada," Bantey said. "I have never seen anything like this in the 35 years I have been practicing media law. It is unprecedented. The police have issued search warrants against media outlets in the past, but nothing as far-ranging as this one."
Henheffer also noted that Lagace's case is only the latest in which a journalist was targeted by police for information, pointing to an incident in September when Quebec provincial police seized Journal de Montreal reporter Michael Nguyen's computer because they believed he had illegally obtained information for a story.
And Stephane Giroux, a spokesperson for the Quebec journalists federation, told CBC that the scandal could chill free speech and discourage sources from reaching out to reporters.
"If they can do it to Patrick Lagace, they can do it to anyone," he said.
Pichet claimed that "all regulations were followed" in the operation of spying on a journalist's phone.
Canadian free speech advocates slammed recent revelations that Montreal police tracked a journalist's cell phone calls, text messages, and locations in an attempt to identify one of his sources, who was leaking details of an internal police investigation.
La Presse columnist Patrick Lagace, the target in the case, called the move "indefensible," stating in an interview on Monday that the approval of a warrant to spy on a journalist was "incredibly aggressive."
"To me, this was a great pretext to try to investigate a reporter who has done numerous stories in the past that have embarrassed the service," he said. "This is a big thing in a country like Canada. Police were permitted to spy on a journalist under very, very thin motives on a secondary part of a criminal investigation."
Supporters of press freedom in Canada said it is part of a worrying "culture shift" brought about by the so-called anti-terror bill approved by Parliament last year, which gave extraordinary new powers to law enforcement agencies, including their ability to spy on civilians.
Tom Henheffer, executive director of Canadian Journalists for Free Expression, told CBC News, "The new powers that the police have to survey Canadians are absolutely horrifying, they're basically limitless, there's very little oversight, and when that happens the system will be ripe for abuse, and this is just an example of how it's abused."
"What's even more worrying about it is the fact that this is a justice of the peace who actually authorized this," he said.
Police reportedly monitored Lagace's iPhone for several months this year in order to find out the identity of his sources, apparently as part of an investigation into a crime that occurred within the police force. The probe was called Projet Escouade, and involved charges of fabricated evidence by officers involved in street gangs and drug trafficking operations. One of the officers being investigated apparently contacted Lagace.
At least 24 surveillance warrants were issued that allowed police to track incoming and outgoing calls on Lagace's phone, as well as its location, although Police Chief Philippe Pichet denied that Lagace's GPS was being monitored.
Mark Bantey, a media lawyer, told CBC News that the revelations were "shocking."
"I was stunned because the police obviously took the very drastic measures to obtain the source of information. I think it's shocking actually. I think it's a serious attack on freedom of the press in Canada," Bantey said. "I have never seen anything like this in the 35 years I have been practicing media law. It is unprecedented. The police have issued search warrants against media outlets in the past, but nothing as far-ranging as this one."
Henheffer also noted that Lagace's case is only the latest in which a journalist was targeted by police for information, pointing to an incident in September when Quebec provincial police seized Journal de Montreal reporter Michael Nguyen's computer because they believed he had illegally obtained information for a story.
And Stephane Giroux, a spokesperson for the Quebec journalists federation, told CBC that the scandal could chill free speech and discourage sources from reaching out to reporters.
"If they can do it to Patrick Lagace, they can do it to anyone," he said.
Pichet claimed that "all regulations were followed" in the operation of spying on a journalist's phone.