Brazil's Balbina Dam created an "artificial archipelago of 3,546 islands." (Photo: Eduardo M. Venticinque)
Jul 02, 2015
A new study by University of East Anglia researchers confirms what numerous Indigenous communities have long charged: gigantic hydroelectric dam construction projects are not environmentally friendly, as proponents claim, but in fact pose a profound threat to biodiversity and life in the Amazon.
Widespread Forest Vertebrate Extinctions Induced by a Mega Hydroelectric Dam in Lowland Amazonia was published Wednesday in the journal PLOS ONE. The paper examines the environmental impact of Brazil's Balbina Dam--which is located near the city of Manaus in the Amazonas state and is one of the largest hydroelectric dams in the world.
The construction of the dam in the 1980s transformed what used to be a lush rainforest forest landscape into an "artificial archipelago of 3,546 islands," explains a summary of the research.
Not surprisingly, when hundreds of square miles of jungle were flooded with water, the wildlife who called that forest home--including mammals, birds, and tortoises--suffered dramatic population loss, with large vertebrates completely disappearing from almost all of the artificial islands, the report concludes.
Furthermore, the summary explains, "Of the 3,546 islands created, only 25 are now likely to harbour at least four fifths of all 35 target species surveyed in the study."
"Hydroelectric dams have been thought to be an environmentally friendly source of renewable power--and in recent years they have been built to supply the burgeoning energy demands of emergent tropical countries," lead author Dr. Maira Benchimol said in a press statement. "Our research adds evidence that forest biodiversity also pays a heavy price when large dams are built."
UAE Professor Carlos Peres added: "The Brazilian government is currently planning to build hundreds of new dams in some of the world's most biodiverse tropical forest regions. But the high biodiversity costs of mega dams should be carefully weighed against any benefits of hydropower production."
Nearly 70 percent of power in Brazil is generated by hydroelectric dams.
Why Your Ongoing Support Is Essential
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare was a staff writer for Common Dreams from 2013-2016. She is currently web editor and reporter for In These Times.
A new study by University of East Anglia researchers confirms what numerous Indigenous communities have long charged: gigantic hydroelectric dam construction projects are not environmentally friendly, as proponents claim, but in fact pose a profound threat to biodiversity and life in the Amazon.
Widespread Forest Vertebrate Extinctions Induced by a Mega Hydroelectric Dam in Lowland Amazonia was published Wednesday in the journal PLOS ONE. The paper examines the environmental impact of Brazil's Balbina Dam--which is located near the city of Manaus in the Amazonas state and is one of the largest hydroelectric dams in the world.
The construction of the dam in the 1980s transformed what used to be a lush rainforest forest landscape into an "artificial archipelago of 3,546 islands," explains a summary of the research.
Not surprisingly, when hundreds of square miles of jungle were flooded with water, the wildlife who called that forest home--including mammals, birds, and tortoises--suffered dramatic population loss, with large vertebrates completely disappearing from almost all of the artificial islands, the report concludes.
Furthermore, the summary explains, "Of the 3,546 islands created, only 25 are now likely to harbour at least four fifths of all 35 target species surveyed in the study."
"Hydroelectric dams have been thought to be an environmentally friendly source of renewable power--and in recent years they have been built to supply the burgeoning energy demands of emergent tropical countries," lead author Dr. Maira Benchimol said in a press statement. "Our research adds evidence that forest biodiversity also pays a heavy price when large dams are built."
UAE Professor Carlos Peres added: "The Brazilian government is currently planning to build hundreds of new dams in some of the world's most biodiverse tropical forest regions. But the high biodiversity costs of mega dams should be carefully weighed against any benefits of hydropower production."
Nearly 70 percent of power in Brazil is generated by hydroelectric dams.
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare was a staff writer for Common Dreams from 2013-2016. She is currently web editor and reporter for In These Times.
A new study by University of East Anglia researchers confirms what numerous Indigenous communities have long charged: gigantic hydroelectric dam construction projects are not environmentally friendly, as proponents claim, but in fact pose a profound threat to biodiversity and life in the Amazon.
Widespread Forest Vertebrate Extinctions Induced by a Mega Hydroelectric Dam in Lowland Amazonia was published Wednesday in the journal PLOS ONE. The paper examines the environmental impact of Brazil's Balbina Dam--which is located near the city of Manaus in the Amazonas state and is one of the largest hydroelectric dams in the world.
The construction of the dam in the 1980s transformed what used to be a lush rainforest forest landscape into an "artificial archipelago of 3,546 islands," explains a summary of the research.
Not surprisingly, when hundreds of square miles of jungle were flooded with water, the wildlife who called that forest home--including mammals, birds, and tortoises--suffered dramatic population loss, with large vertebrates completely disappearing from almost all of the artificial islands, the report concludes.
Furthermore, the summary explains, "Of the 3,546 islands created, only 25 are now likely to harbour at least four fifths of all 35 target species surveyed in the study."
"Hydroelectric dams have been thought to be an environmentally friendly source of renewable power--and in recent years they have been built to supply the burgeoning energy demands of emergent tropical countries," lead author Dr. Maira Benchimol said in a press statement. "Our research adds evidence that forest biodiversity also pays a heavy price when large dams are built."
UAE Professor Carlos Peres added: "The Brazilian government is currently planning to build hundreds of new dams in some of the world's most biodiverse tropical forest regions. But the high biodiversity costs of mega dams should be carefully weighed against any benefits of hydropower production."
Nearly 70 percent of power in Brazil is generated by hydroelectric dams.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.