SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
As DOJ Cracks Down on FIFA, Are Powerful Multinationals Being Shielded from Public Exposure?
Although not named in federal indictment, Nike is believed to be one of the companies implicated in the bribery and racketeering scandal
May 28, 2015
As the U.S. Department of Justice, in concert with European officials, launches a much-publicized crackdown on FIFA corruption, bribery, and racketeering, the powerful multinational corporation Nike--widely believed to be implicated in the scandal--has been largely shielded from the same public outing.
The discrepancy adds to suspicions that, despite the "tough-on-white-collar-crime" rhetoric of the DOJ, the agency is in fact far more willing to aggressively go after the Zurich-headquartered soccer enterprise and smaller companies than powerful multinationals and financial institutions.
The DOJ announced on Wednesday that it is levying charges against 9 FIFA officials and 5 corporate executives, and Swiss authorities raided FIFA's headquarters and arrested officials pending their extradition to the United States.
Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch emphasized the DOJ's "get tough" attitude in statements Wednesday: "Today's action makes clear that this Department of Justice intends to end any such corrupt practices, to root out misconduct, and to bring wrongdoers to justice - and we look forward to continuing to work with other countries in this effort."
Although it is not clear why, the DOJ appears not to be subjecting some of the corporations involved in the scandal to the same level of public exposure as the FIFA officials.
The indictment directly references a "a major U.S. sportswear company" allegedly involved in bribery related to the Brazilian national soccer team. However, this "major U.S. sportswear company" was left unnamed.
As Washington Post writer Drew Harwell spells out, "Although investigators will not name the company, the indictment says the sportswear firm signed a 10-year, $160 million sponsorship deal with the Brazilian team in 1996, closely matching Nike's clothes, shoes and equipment deal with the team that year."
The New York Times also pointed to Nike as the likely culprit, running the headline Wednesday: "Nike Says It's Cooperating With Authorities in FIFA Probe."
However, no high-profile raids of Nike's Oregon headquarters, or arrests of their high-ranking officials, have been reported since Wednesday's announcement. Furthermore, Nike is not named anywhere in the DOJ's indictment announcement.
As Common Dreams noted Wednesday, many are already raising questions about why the DOJ has failed to target bankers, politicians, and one-percenters in the United States.
This does not, however, mean that FIFA's hands are clean. The soccer enterprise, along with the companies and governments it does business with, faces a host of charges, including involvement in worker abuse, modern-day slavery, prison labor, mass displacement of poor and Indigenous peoples, and severe environmental irresponsibility.
In a statement released Thursday, Minky Worden, director of global initiatives for Human Rights Watch, denounced the "crises--including human rights abuses and corruption--that are undermining the foundations of football's management."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare is the editor of Workday Magazine and a contributing editor for In These Times. She is a former Staff Writer at Common Dreams. She comes from a background in independent journalism for publications including The Intercept, The Nation, and Tom Dispatch.
As the U.S. Department of Justice, in concert with European officials, launches a much-publicized crackdown on FIFA corruption, bribery, and racketeering, the powerful multinational corporation Nike--widely believed to be implicated in the scandal--has been largely shielded from the same public outing.
The discrepancy adds to suspicions that, despite the "tough-on-white-collar-crime" rhetoric of the DOJ, the agency is in fact far more willing to aggressively go after the Zurich-headquartered soccer enterprise and smaller companies than powerful multinationals and financial institutions.
The DOJ announced on Wednesday that it is levying charges against 9 FIFA officials and 5 corporate executives, and Swiss authorities raided FIFA's headquarters and arrested officials pending their extradition to the United States.
Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch emphasized the DOJ's "get tough" attitude in statements Wednesday: "Today's action makes clear that this Department of Justice intends to end any such corrupt practices, to root out misconduct, and to bring wrongdoers to justice - and we look forward to continuing to work with other countries in this effort."
Although it is not clear why, the DOJ appears not to be subjecting some of the corporations involved in the scandal to the same level of public exposure as the FIFA officials.
The indictment directly references a "a major U.S. sportswear company" allegedly involved in bribery related to the Brazilian national soccer team. However, this "major U.S. sportswear company" was left unnamed.
As Washington Post writer Drew Harwell spells out, "Although investigators will not name the company, the indictment says the sportswear firm signed a 10-year, $160 million sponsorship deal with the Brazilian team in 1996, closely matching Nike's clothes, shoes and equipment deal with the team that year."
The New York Times also pointed to Nike as the likely culprit, running the headline Wednesday: "Nike Says It's Cooperating With Authorities in FIFA Probe."
However, no high-profile raids of Nike's Oregon headquarters, or arrests of their high-ranking officials, have been reported since Wednesday's announcement. Furthermore, Nike is not named anywhere in the DOJ's indictment announcement.
As Common Dreams noted Wednesday, many are already raising questions about why the DOJ has failed to target bankers, politicians, and one-percenters in the United States.
This does not, however, mean that FIFA's hands are clean. The soccer enterprise, along with the companies and governments it does business with, faces a host of charges, including involvement in worker abuse, modern-day slavery, prison labor, mass displacement of poor and Indigenous peoples, and severe environmental irresponsibility.
In a statement released Thursday, Minky Worden, director of global initiatives for Human Rights Watch, denounced the "crises--including human rights abuses and corruption--that are undermining the foundations of football's management."
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare is the editor of Workday Magazine and a contributing editor for In These Times. She is a former Staff Writer at Common Dreams. She comes from a background in independent journalism for publications including The Intercept, The Nation, and Tom Dispatch.
As the U.S. Department of Justice, in concert with European officials, launches a much-publicized crackdown on FIFA corruption, bribery, and racketeering, the powerful multinational corporation Nike--widely believed to be implicated in the scandal--has been largely shielded from the same public outing.
The discrepancy adds to suspicions that, despite the "tough-on-white-collar-crime" rhetoric of the DOJ, the agency is in fact far more willing to aggressively go after the Zurich-headquartered soccer enterprise and smaller companies than powerful multinationals and financial institutions.
The DOJ announced on Wednesday that it is levying charges against 9 FIFA officials and 5 corporate executives, and Swiss authorities raided FIFA's headquarters and arrested officials pending their extradition to the United States.
Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch emphasized the DOJ's "get tough" attitude in statements Wednesday: "Today's action makes clear that this Department of Justice intends to end any such corrupt practices, to root out misconduct, and to bring wrongdoers to justice - and we look forward to continuing to work with other countries in this effort."
Although it is not clear why, the DOJ appears not to be subjecting some of the corporations involved in the scandal to the same level of public exposure as the FIFA officials.
The indictment directly references a "a major U.S. sportswear company" allegedly involved in bribery related to the Brazilian national soccer team. However, this "major U.S. sportswear company" was left unnamed.
As Washington Post writer Drew Harwell spells out, "Although investigators will not name the company, the indictment says the sportswear firm signed a 10-year, $160 million sponsorship deal with the Brazilian team in 1996, closely matching Nike's clothes, shoes and equipment deal with the team that year."
The New York Times also pointed to Nike as the likely culprit, running the headline Wednesday: "Nike Says It's Cooperating With Authorities in FIFA Probe."
However, no high-profile raids of Nike's Oregon headquarters, or arrests of their high-ranking officials, have been reported since Wednesday's announcement. Furthermore, Nike is not named anywhere in the DOJ's indictment announcement.
As Common Dreams noted Wednesday, many are already raising questions about why the DOJ has failed to target bankers, politicians, and one-percenters in the United States.
This does not, however, mean that FIFA's hands are clean. The soccer enterprise, along with the companies and governments it does business with, faces a host of charges, including involvement in worker abuse, modern-day slavery, prison labor, mass displacement of poor and Indigenous peoples, and severe environmental irresponsibility.
In a statement released Thursday, Minky Worden, director of global initiatives for Human Rights Watch, denounced the "crises--including human rights abuses and corruption--that are undermining the foundations of football's management."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.